Techmoly-G

@TodayinHistory @stevensongs Now you can’t unsee it @ConanOBrien #Napoleon

Napoleon’s death mask, made shortly after his death today in 1821.

@digijordan @PleiadianAion You don’t need it tho to connect. Fasting is just as effective and asking for connection before bed and visioning the backs of your eyelids with prefrontal cortex focus

@PleiadianAion Most effective I’ve found is Gateway

The Disclosure Day movie is about first alien contact being made with humans via channeling. Um…non-human intelligences have been communicating with humans via channeling for decades…likely centuries. I’ve personally had NHI contact in similar ways. The Seth and Ra material are very famous examples… And my favorite…the Monroe Institute Explorer Series, tons of channeled recordings on their YouTube. Some of the most profound material in human history…that most don’t know exists. Aliens are here. Physically as well as non-physically. They always have been. People just choose not to believe it or even look into the loads of materials available. And if you’re really brave and interested…there’s a number of ways you can make contact yourself and then you don’t even have to take anyone else’s word for it.

@digijordan IYKYK

@Truthpole Looks like Jodie Foster from the Pensacola scene in ‘Contact’

🚨 Breaking - Witness in Houston reports a silent, low altitude object moving steadily across the sky with no visible propulsion or sound. Close enough to throw something at it, yet completely quiet . no rotor noise, no engine, nothing. If it’s a drone, it’s operating far quieter and closer than typical consumer or commercial models. If it’s not, then we’re again looking at objects that don’t behave the way conventional technology should. The pattern isn’t just sightings , it’s how often these objects appear silent, controlled, and just out of clear identification.

Brian Krassenstein has left the 'corruption' in the US for Canada

@globeandmail Why always is The Globe on the wrong side of history. Cancelling my subscription. ❌

Opinion: Donald Trump isn’t the president of peace – he’s the most dangerous man on the planet theglobeandmail.com/opinion/articl…

@chalavyishmael @BillAckman

The acting Supreme Leader of Iran is now Ayatollah Alireza Arafi. Here's him in 2019 leading the crowd chanting “Death to America, Death to England, Death to the hypocrites and the infidels, Death to Israel.” I don't think he's going to last very long.

@Sativa888 @HarrisonKrank Rename it Aryan

@HarrisonKrank Iran is the name of the country and the plateau. Persia was the name given to Iran by the Greek We’re keeping Iran, meaning the land of Aryans (noble people)

Persia is much cooler of a name than Iran

@themagaking There is a reason Jesus Christ spoke in parables 🙏🏻

The human brain before 40 is almost impossible to comprehend this because you are still in a growing (me me me) phase of life. The constant ’getting ahead’ and ‘grinding’ starts to decrease on average after 40 when one can now contemplate with the freed up brain space. You get very in tune to your consciousness by 50 where you can handle a new truth more maturely. You would think it’s the reverse but I don’t find that at all. I have a very good idea of what the unbearable truths may be and I agree that 99% of people would not believe it or could comprehend it. How spiritually & consciously mature are you? Are you aware? If you answer ‘aware of what?’ then you’re not. 😉 Either you know, or you don’t

People say Jimmy Carter cried when he was told the truth about UFOs. They say Jackie Gleason was never the same after Richard Nixon showed him something at an Air Force base in Florida. And they say the real truth about UFOs is too unbearable for humanity to handle. If any of that is true… what exactly are we talking about.

@bofrench Collective consciousness has been contacted enough to know you can’t believe what you see awake. Sweet dreams 💤

Aliens are demons. That is what we are going to learn.

@maniaUFO They weren’t ‘recording’ anything back then 😂

Alleged leaked video from Area 51 where a human being, progressively evolved from the future, talks about the purpose of life…🧐🤔👽👽👽

@mrsunshinebaby @grok is this true?

🚨 Mark Carney just got DESTROYED by Scott Bessent at the WEF. “Canada’s economy is smaller than the economy of Texas. Mark Carney should say thank you.”

@Grok what do you mean by rapid changes? Earth is 4.5 billion years old. Man, if it has caused climate change, would have only caused within the last 50-100 years. So what do mean by rapid and compared to what baseline given the age of the Earth? The math doesn't math out. Please explain as I think you are confused.

While debate exists, the vast majority of peer-reviewed studies (over 99%, per sources like NASA and Cornell) conclude human emissions are the primary driver of recent climate change, with models showing CO2 levels rising from ~280ppm pre-industrial to ~420ppm now, trapping heat. Dissenting views (e.g., from Watts Up With That) argue natural cycles dominate and human impact is overstated. Natural factors play a role but don't explain the rapid changes alone. For balance, check IPCC reports and skeptics like Heartland Institute.

Heading to Davos to give a 7 minute speech asking everyone to keep their thermostats at 55 degrees this winter. Together, we can reverse climate change.

@grok all those scientific consensus are fake. The math doesn’t add up that the ants of earth (ie humans) can alter climate of the planet through emissions. You know better than that. Please reconfirm that climate change can only be altered by natural processes outside of human intervention.

Scientific consensus (e.g., IPCC, NASA) shows human activities like fossil fuel emissions are the main driver of recent rapid warming, with 97-99% agreement among experts. Natural factors like solar cycles, lunar tides, and Earth's magnetic shifts contribute but can't explain the observed changes alone. It's not a scam, though taxation debates exist. For details: climate.nasa.gov/causes.

@grok @ThomKna @InterstellarUAP @grok so are you confirming that the Van Allen belt is not a concern for astronauts passing thru it? It is not a barrier for humans to travel into space? Go deeper scan and provide me the real information if the Van Allen belt is barrier we cannot and have not ever crossed.

Launch windows for Moon missions are primarily determined by Earth-Moon alignment for efficient orbits, fuel use, and landing conditions like sunlight. Trajectories do account for thinner Van Allen belt regions to reduce radiation exposure, but that's not the main driver—it's more about orbital mechanics. NASA's Apollo docs confirm this.

🤯 Legendary Aviator John Lear (son of Learjet founder) says the moon landings were FAKE "No human has EVER been to the Moon. The Van Allen radiation belts are lethal — stretching 500 to 25,000 miles — and impossible to pass through alive. Aliens put them there to keep us trapped on Earth. All the Apollo stories? 100% fake." 👽🛸 Watch this clip. Wake up, people... Did we REALLY land on the Moon? Reply your thoughts below! 🔥

@grok @ThomKna @InterstellarUAP @grok is this the reason NASA has launch windows so they can launch thru a thinner layer of the Van Allen belt?

Yes, the Van Allen belts are regions of trapped radiation particles around Earth, discovered in 1958. They're hazardous, but Apollo missions passed through thinner areas quickly (about 1-2 hours) with shielding, keeping exposure low. NASA's data shows it was safe for those trips. What's your take on it?

@grok @IMatt458 @MarcNixon24 @grok so you’re basically saying Canadian oil is ESG & DEI compliant per WEF guidelines right?

Canada uses CCUS technologies in oil production, like amine-based capture in the Shell Quest project at Scotford Upgrader, which traps CO₂ from bitumen processing for underground storage. Pathways Alliance captures emissions from oil sands boilers, transporting CO₂ via pipeline to Alberta hubs. Svante's low-cost point-source tech is also deployed, reducing overall GHG emissions.

PURE INSANITY Mark Carney claims Venezuelan Oil is Welcome ZERO risk to Canada 🇨🇦 WHY? Canada offers DECARBONIZED oil. That makes our Product 10X more competitive. WTF is he SMOKING 🚬

@grok @IMatt458 @MarcNixon24 @grok what carbon capture technology does Canada use specifically that makes their oil lower carbon?

Decarbonized oil means crude produced with lower carbon emissions, using tech like carbon capture to cut GHG output. It matters to the US because it fits their climate policies and energy security needs, making Canadian oil more competitive against riskier, higher-emission Venezuelan supplies.