Khaleel

@muslimorthodoxy @teoness101 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@teoness101 No paycheck! Orthodox Muslim snatches careers and paychecks. Give me your lunch money cross licker

How I feel when I intellectually dominate a Christian apologist, post him embarrasing himself, and copyright strike him & take away his pay check. 😂😭😭

@KR3Wmatic Ask her to prove you are her father with 100% certainty, leaving absolutely no possibility of error.

My atheist daughter asked me to prove God's existence. What do I tell her? She is 19.

@AtheistTakes It's honestly sad to live life like this. To be so arrogant on something you can't even disprove and form a whole identity around it.

r/atheism is still mad about the astronauts

@raphaelgoated @muslimorthodoxy @paleochristcon

@muslimorthodoxy @paleochristcon You’re some highsxhool loser that sold their soul to the devil to debate and you preach salvation through Islam? Lmao what a hypocrite you are perhaps one of the stupidest mother fuckers out there

Shot you a DM just like you suggested Ball’s in your court. @paleochristcon

@AngelloGua65392 @doofgeek4011 Okay....who. is. the. subject?

@Tawhidview @doofgeek4011 I didn’t use those semantics. I never qualified the subject in any way.

The one divine Person truly dies in his assumed human nature, so it is correct to say “God died” (by communication of idioms), though not in the divine nature itself. The meme errs by separating the subject of death from the Person who suffers it. newadvent.org/summa/4.htm

@AngelloGua65392 @doofgeek4011 Are 'Jesus qua divinity' and 'Jesus qua humanity' coreferential to the same subject?

@Tawhidview @doofgeek4011 Jesus is-qua-divinity immortal, Jesus is-qua-humanity mortal.

@luke_leisher_ I will never understand how your identity can be all about being angry about something you don't believe in

It’s 2026 and Reddit atheists are still the most miserable people on the planet.

@PAHoyeck I learned the same thing this year. I mean I guess for some academic books you can read it for reference by going to particular chapters but I wouldn't claim I read the book. I can't imagine getting any book without reading it cover to cover honestly.

Apparently this is a hot take, but you haven't actually read a book unless you've read it cover to cover. Skimming select chapters, reading an AI summary of the book, or watching a YouTube video about it do not give you anywhere near the same grasp on the material as reading it.

@fghbdsxc @doofgeek4011 just answer my question dude omg...

@Tawhidview @doofgeek4011 Stop being a sophist and read my reply retard

@hendersalderon @KhalilAndani @Sean_McDowell @Acts17David So intellectual...

@Tawhidview @KhalilAndani @Sean_McDowell @Acts17David If Muslims are going to around intentionally lying to unknowing people to convert them to your death cult, Christians have every right to debunk your obvious false religion in response.

Don't miss this convo with @Acts17David about the "Islamic Dilemma," which has been called Islam's unanswerable problem (Tuesday 12 noon PST): youtube.com/watch?v=yVpxQl…

@AngelloGua65392 @doofgeek4011 Lay out your "two statements" clearly

@Tawhidview @doofgeek4011 Alright, so derive the contradiction from my two statements. Btw, the scope is not to change the meaning of the predicates.

@fghbdsxc @doofgeek4011 and is death predicated to the subject or the nature...

@Tawhidview @doofgeek4011 How is it redefining death 😭😭 if you believe in a immaterial immortal soul this is literally what death is

@KhalilAndani @Sean_McDowell @Acts17David It's sad because instead of trying to solve the LPT they are spending all of their time on another religion

@Sean_McDowell @Acts17David I’ve already answered it and even some Christian professors and academics have said it’s a poor argument

@AngelloGua65392 @doofgeek4011 even if your qua isn't reduplicative, you're STILL predicating mortality and immoratlity of the SAME subject. qualification alone doesn't remove the opposition between mortal and immortal.

@Tawhidview @doofgeek4011 No, it doesn’t. Not every qua strategy is reduplicative, mine certainly wasn’t.

@AngelloGua65392 @doofgeek4011 but the subject...is still the son. you're still predicating mortality and immortality of the same person. adding "qua" works only if the aspects are separable in a way that avoids opposite predicates applying to the same subject.

@Tawhidview @doofgeek4011 Right, but the point is if we’re saying this: The Son is-qua-divinity immortal and the Son is qua-humanity mortal, there is no explicit contradiction given they are not the negation of one another.

@AngelloGua65392 @doofgeek4011 qualifying the copula doesn't remove the tension. mortality and immortality are still predicated of the same person. you're still affirming that the same subject both dies and cannot die...

@Tawhidview @doofgeek4011 Well, I mean, it does if you’re going to focus the qualification on the coupla.

@AngelloGua65392 @doofgeek4011 precision doesn't remove contradiction if the same subject still has opposite predicates

@Tawhidview @doofgeek4011 And the illocution of those statements will be more precisified, such that any charge of a contradiction is removed.

@fghbdsxc @doofgeek4011 redefining death doesn't solve the contradiction, it just moves it into a different definition

@Tawhidview @doofgeek4011 misunderstanding what death even is in the first place, you can’t “die” unless you have the properties to experience death (Soul and Body) which Jesus took on in the incarnation, the incarnate hypostasis did in fact die becaue death is separation of body and soul (James 2:26)

Christianity is the most obvious false religion in the world. It is not up for serious debate