Codsworth

1.5K posts

Codsworth banner
Codsworth

Codsworth

@TheBookOfFester

So cooked always all the time completely

เข้าร่วม Ocak 2022
78 กำลังติดตาม9 ผู้ติดตาม
Codsworth
Codsworth@TheBookOfFester·
@imalady18 @thespikyclub @thefemiurge The ruling does not state that a woman has the power to compel a service provider to alter their policy surrounding trans women. It is simply not conclusive that proactive discrimination is required by the service provider. Future case law will determine that. Thats common law.
English
0
0
0
7
i'm-a-lady ✝️
i'm-a-lady ✝️@imalady18·
@TheBookOfFester @thespikyclub @thefemiurge Again, Single sex facilities must be provided in workplaces under the health and safety act If a woman complains the law states a TW must be removed. Even if this done discreetly TW are not to be left with no facilities but they are to use men’s or other facilities if available
English
1
0
0
15
Codsworth
Codsworth@TheBookOfFester·
@imalady18 @thespikyclub @thefemiurge Yes, if the facility decides to enforce that standard they are legally permitted. Whether or not they are required to do so is to be determined by future case law. As it stands, there is no precedent to compel them.
English
0
0
0
7
Codsworth
Codsworth@TheBookOfFester·
@imalady18 @thespikyclub @thefemiurge Yes there is, that's why it says "may" not "must." It is possible, perhaps even likely, that legal precedent for the SC's decision will ultimately result in a proactive requirement for the segregation of TW from public facilities, but as it stands the case law does not exist.
English
1
0
0
7
Codsworth
Codsworth@TheBookOfFester·
@imalady18 @thespikyclub @thefemiurge No, my argument is that the law does not require the segregation of trans women from women's restrooms under this precedent. There is no law on the books in the UK that says "trans women are to be bared entry to women's spaces." That is a grevious misunderstanding of the ruling.
English
1
0
0
15
Codsworth
Codsworth@TheBookOfFester·
@imalady18 @thespikyclub @thefemiurge That doesn't contradict anything that I've said at all. In fact it is totally in line with my stated position. What do you think that my argument is?
English
1
0
0
9
i'm-a-lady ✝️
i'm-a-lady ✝️@imalady18·
@TheBookOfFester @thespikyclub @thefemiurge Too bad your argument against what I am saying is not as water-tight as you thought. The Supreme Court decision was clear. An EHRC ruling was pushed by the TRA movement to oppose the SC. They wanted it to say that it violated the EA act. It didn’t…… Try to keep up.
English
1
0
0
6
Codsworth
Codsworth@TheBookOfFester·
@imalady18 @thespikyclub @thefemiurge I understand thats your intuition, but there is not a precedent set for that by this supreme court ruling. If that is the case, it is to be determined by further case law.
English
1
0
0
11
Codsworth
Codsworth@TheBookOfFester·
@imalady18 @thespikyclub @thefemiurge Big dawg, your ai slop says that that is a possible (not conclusive) ramification of this interpretation. You should read the things you post before posting them. Moreover, the EHRC is not a ruling legislative or legal body with any power to enforce it's interpretations of law.
English
1
0
0
9
Codsworth
Codsworth@TheBookOfFester·
@imalady18 @thespikyclub @thefemiurge Simply not what the ruling says. Women do not have any innate legal authority to demand a precedent by applied in this fashion. It is the discretion of the transit provider and their guidelines, which, again, are not required by law to segregate trans women to be compliant.
English
2
0
0
21
Codsworth
Codsworth@TheBookOfFester·
@imalady18 @thespikyclub @thefemiurge In that this person would have no legal recourse had they been directed to use an alternative facility yes, absolutely. However the person in question was not directed to do so, and the facility in question is not required to segregate them.
English
1
0
0
14
Codsworth
Codsworth@TheBookOfFester·
@imalady18 @thespikyclub @thefemiurge Yes, single sex spaces that are NOT legally *compelled* by this ruling to prevent trans women from access. They are simply *able* to do so.
English
1
0
0
27
i'm-a-lady ✝️
i'm-a-lady ✝️@imalady18·
@TheBookOfFester @thespikyclub @thefemiurge No sweetie. A private facility/company etc may choose. What is unambiguously true is that public entities - that includes station hubs, which are also workplaces under the health and safety act, must provide single sex spaces… or individual units.
English
2
0
0
33
Codsworth
Codsworth@TheBookOfFester·
@imalady18 @thespikyclub @thefemiurge Correct; sex segregated toilets must be provided. However, a service provider is NOT required to prohibit trans women's access to those toilets. They simply are legally allowed to do so.
English
1
0
0
22
Codsworth
Codsworth@TheBookOfFester·
@imalady18 @thespikyclub @thefemiurge Miss girl, no one is saying that trans women in the UK have a legal right to those spaces under this ruling. That is unambiguously true. What you are misunderstanding, is that this means that a service provider is permitted to discriminate, not that it is required to.
English
1
0
0
24
Codsworth
Codsworth@TheBookOfFester·
@imalady18 @thespikyclub @thefemiurge Again, it says they CAN. Not that they MUST. It is plainly written in the ruling, and in the ai generated summaries you posted without reading them first. If something is compelled by legal precedent, it is unambiguously stated in the ruling.
English
1
0
0
7
i'm-a-lady ✝️
i'm-a-lady ✝️@imalady18·
@TheBookOfFester @thespikyclub @thefemiurge Sorry babe. They didn’t react because they didn’t understand the law. If it’s a single sex facility in a public space that is subject to the law, it’s clear…female space means bio female only. As noted previously, at station hubs, TW can be directed to male or unisex facilities
English
1
0
0
28
Codsworth
Codsworth@TheBookOfFester·
@imalady18 @thespikyclub @thefemiurge It says that there *must* be sex segregated restrooms, and it says that it is permitted under EA 2010 to exclude trans women from those spaces. It does not say that said exclusion is required by law.
English
1
0
0
28
i'm-a-lady ✝️
i'm-a-lady ✝️@imalady18·
@TheBookOfFester @thespikyclub @thefemiurge No sweetie. They must. Not ALL specific facilities “must” be, but there must be some. So if there are only two bathrooms on a platform, it’s expected that one will be female (SC definition) only If multiple bathroom areas, and some want to be labelled unisex, go ahead
English
2
0
0
15
Codsworth
Codsworth@TheBookOfFester·
@imalady18 @thespikyclub @thefemiurge Lmao reddit. That said, you are simply not reading the things you post here, you're just operating from a base assumption. This clearly says that employers *can* restrict access, not that they *must* restrict access. This is how common law functions, its for future precedent.
English
1
0
0
18
i'm-a-lady ✝️
i'm-a-lady ✝️@imalady18·
@TheBookOfFester @thespikyclub @thefemiurge Nope. Health and safety means they must supply single sex spaces for women as stations are also workplaces. And those spaces exclude TW who are classified as men under the newer SC 2025 ruling. Sorry if women legally being allowed to have single sex bathrooms upsets you.
i'm-a-lady ✝️ tweet mediai'm-a-lady ✝️ tweet media
English
1
0
0
33
Codsworth
Codsworth@TheBookOfFester·
@imalady18 @thespikyclub @thefemiurge Again, these screenshots explicitly say that this is a standard that *may* apply. It does not say that they are legally *compelled* to do so. The ruling sets the precedent that exclusion of transgender women from women-only spaces is permitted under EA 2010, not that its required
English
1
0
0
25
Codsworth รีทวีตแล้ว
WiseGoobert32
WiseGoobert32@WiseGoobert32·
@failmoder What if instead of boymoding it was called “marmotmoding”, and it’s where you would go out in public while looking like an awesome Himalayan marmot. I think that would be much cooler because I love marmots. They are my favorite animal.
GIF
English
1
17
174
4.2K
Codsworth รีทวีตแล้ว
RednBlackSalamander
RednBlackSalamander@9mmballpoint·
Yes it certainly does suck to have your every move watched and scrutinized by hostile strangers doesn't it Palantir Technologies Inc.
RednBlackSalamander tweet media
Palantir@PalantirTech

Because we get asked a lot. The Technological Republic, in brief. 1. Silicon Valley owes a moral debt to the country that made its rise possible. The engineering elite of Silicon Valley has an affirmative obligation to participate in the defense of the nation. 2. We must rebel against the tyranny of the apps. Is the iPhone our greatest creative if not crowning achievement as a civilization? The object has changed our lives, but it may also now be limiting and constraining our sense of the possible. 3. Free email is not enough. The decadence of a culture or civilization, and indeed its ruling class, will be forgiven only if that culture is capable of delivering economic growth and security for the public. 4. The limits of soft power, of soaring rhetoric alone, have been exposed. The ability of free and democratic societies to prevail requires something more than moral appeal. It requires hard power, and hard power in this century will be built on software. 5. The question is not whether A.I. weapons will be built; it is who will build them and for what purpose. Our adversaries will not pause to indulge in theatrical debates about the merits of developing technologies with critical military and national security applications. They will proceed. 6. National service should be a universal duty. We should, as a society, seriously consider moving away from an all-volunteer force and only fight the next war if everyone shares in the risk and the cost. 7. If a U.S. Marine asks for a better rifle, we should build it; and the same goes for software. We should as a country be capable of continuing a debate about the appropriateness of military action abroad while remaining unflinching in our commitment to those we have asked to step into harm’s way. 8. Public servants need not be our priests. Any business that compensated its employees in the way that the federal government compensates public servants would struggle to survive. 9. We should show far more grace towards those who have subjected themselves to public life. The eradication of any space for forgiveness—a jettisoning of any tolerance for the complexities and contradictions of the human psyche—may leave us with a cast of characters at the helm we will grow to regret. 10. The psychologization of modern politics is leading us astray. Those who look to the political arena to nourish their soul and sense of self, who rely too heavily on their internal life finding expression in people they may never meet, will be left disappointed. 11. Our society has grown too eager to hasten, and is often gleeful at, the demise of its enemies. The vanquishing of an opponent is a moment to pause, not rejoice. 12. The atomic age is ending. One age of deterrence, the atomic age, is ending, and a new era of deterrence built on A.I. is set to begin. 13. No other country in the history of the world has advanced progressive values more than this one. The United States is far from perfect. But it is easy to forget how much more opportunity exists in this country for those who are not hereditary elites than in any other nation on the planet. 14. American power has made possible an extraordinarily long peace. Too many have forgotten or perhaps take for granted that nearly a century of some version of peace has prevailed in the world without a great power military conflict. At least three generations — billions of people and their children and now grandchildren — have never known a world war. 15. The postwar neutering of Germany and Japan must be undone. The defanging of Germany was an overcorrection for which Europe is now paying a heavy price. A similar and highly theatrical commitment to Japanese pacifism will, if maintained, also threaten to shift the balance of power in Asia. 16. We should applaud those who attempt to build where the market has failed to act. The culture almost snickers at Musk’s interest in grand narrative, as if billionaires ought to simply stay in their lane of enriching themselves . . . . Any curiosity or genuine interest in the value of what he has created is essentially dismissed, or perhaps lurks from beneath a thinly veiled scorn. 17. Silicon Valley must play a role in addressing violent crime. Many politicians across the United States have essentially shrugged when it comes to violent crime, abandoning any serious efforts to address the problem or take on any risk with their constituencies or donors in coming up with solutions and experiments in what should be a desperate bid to save lives. 18. The ruthless exposure of the private lives of public figures drives far too much talent away from government service. The public arena—and the shallow and petty assaults against those who dare to do something other than enrich themselves—has become so unforgiving that the republic is left with a significant roster of ineffectual, empty vessels whose ambition one would forgive if there were any genuine belief structure lurking within. 19. The caution in public life that we unwittingly encourage is corrosive. Those who say nothing wrong often say nothing much at all. 20. The pervasive intolerance of religious belief in certain circles must be resisted. The elite’s intolerance of religious belief is perhaps one of the most telling signs that its political project constitutes a less open intellectual movement than many within it would claim. 21. Some cultures have produced vital advances; others remain dysfunctional and regressive. All cultures are now equal. Criticism and value judgments are forbidden. Yet this new dogma glosses over the fact that certain cultures and indeed subcultures . . . have produced wonders. Others have proven middling, and worse, regressive and harmful. 22. We must resist the shallow temptation of a vacant and hollow pluralism. We, in America and more broadly the West, have for the past half century resisted defining national cultures in the name of inclusivity. But inclusion into what? Excerpts from the #1 New York Times Bestseller The Technological Republic: Hard Power, Soft Belief, and the Future of the West, by Alexander C. Karp & Nicholas W. Zamiska techrepublicbook.com

English
9
83
548
9.2K