The Holmes Front

You can respect what Farage achieved over Brexit without treating him as the permanent proprietor of British patriotism. Patriotism is not personal loyalty to one man. It is loyalty to the country. If people believe Reform has become too compromised, too personality-led and too full of the old Tory machine, they are entitled to build something better. Calling them morons rather proves why many have moved on.

Starmer’s argument is that social media can be useful, positive and valuable - but if children are being harmed, government must act. Fine. Now apply the same principle to borders. When foreign nationals who should not be here rape, kill or attack children, suddenly we are told it is complicated, nuanced and legally difficult. So which is it? If protecting children justifies hard action on social media, it also justifies hard action on border control, deportations and public safety.

The Prime Minister has announced a sweeping ban on social media for under-16s in a news conference at Downing Street. Follow live 👇 lbc.co.uk/article/social…

Starmer’s argument is that social media can be useful, positive and valuable - but if children are being harmed, government must act. Fine. Now apply the same principle to borders. When foreign nationals who should not be here rape, kill or attack children, suddenly we are told it is complicated, nuanced and legally difficult. So which is it? If protecting children justifies hard action on social media, it also justifies hard action on border control, deportations and public safety.

Starmer’s argument is that social media can be useful, positive and valuable - but if children are being harmed, government must act. Fine. Now apply the same principle to borders. When foreign nationals who should not be here rape, kill or attack children, suddenly we are told it is complicated, nuanced and legally difficult. So which is it? If protecting children justifies hard action on social media, it also justifies hard action on border control, deportations and public safety.

Starmer’s argument is that social media can be useful, positive and valuable - but if children are being harmed, government must act. Fine. Now apply the same principle to borders. When foreign nationals who should not be here rape, kill or attack children, suddenly we are told it is complicated, nuanced and legally difficult. So which is it? If protecting children justifies hard action on social media, it also justifies hard action on border control, deportations and public safety.

Starmer has reached the “borrowing Andy Burnham’s cardigan” stage of political survival. Always a strong sign.

@davethedrill1 @reformparty_uk @RestoreBritain New account, yes. Your argument appears to be from 2019, so I think we balance out.

@TheHolmesFront @reformparty_uk @RestoreBritain Oh look! another new account attacking Reform. Opened May 2026 ;)

Dear Reform @reformparty_uk supporters, We get it. You don’t like Restore. You think we’re traitors. You think we’re splitting the vote. You think only Reform can save Britain. Message received but we don't care. You enjoy your meltdowns. We’ll keep building. @RestoreBritain @RupertLowe10

@davethedrill1 @reformparty_uk @RestoreBritain The confidence-to-literacy ratio here is magnificent.

@TheHolmesFront @reformparty_uk @RestoreBritain It's not think. It's know. Your not the sharpest tool in the box are you.

@Anon7127 Thanks for the share. Appreciated 👍

@TheHolmesFront is on 355,needs a follow please guys 🫡🇬🇧

@AdrianSage4 @Frankie_1643 @reformparty_uk @RestoreBritain Reform’s “progress” came with Farage, legacy infrastructure and wall-to-wall media attention. Restore is building from scratch. Yet here you are, talking about it again. For something moving like treacle, it does seem to have got under your feet.

@TheHolmesFront @Frankie_1643 @reformparty_uk @RestoreBritain I'd say your progress in 5 months us somewhat lacklustre.. look at Reform 5 months after NF returned to politics.. now that what you call progress.. Restore are more like treacle out of a jar

There it is. Do not debate Restore’s policies. Do not ask why people are abandoning the old parties. Just shout “Nazi”, smear young activists, and imply Makerfield voters are too stupid to think for themselves. Desperate politics from a failed political class.

No, we do not hate Reform voters. We respect anyone who wants to reverse decades of national decline. The disagreement is not about whether Britain needs restoring. It is about how that is achieved, who can be trusted to do it, and whether the old political machinery can ever deliver real change. That is a disagreement. Not hatred.

Let’s be honest, Restore hate Reformers. Lowe despises us, he hates what we want and what we want to achieve. He spends all his time attacking us. His followers spam your timelines hurling out insults. It’s a very odd way to convince fellow right wing voters?

@zarahussain999 What will you be when you read @RestoreBritain policies? Enjoy!

Nigel Farage wants to evict foreign nationals and their families from council properties, then deport them if they don’t find alternative accommodation. We’re disgusted. Fortunately, it doesn’t affect me because I was granted British citizenship, but it will impact thousands with ILR status. I advised those eligible to get British citizenship ASAP in case Reform wins the general election in 2029.

Reform is definitely not Tory 2.0. It just happens to include: Lee Anderson Suella Braverman Robert Jenrick Nadhim Zahawi Danny Kruger Andrew Rosindell Nadine Dorries Ben Bradley Chris Green Lia Nici Jonathan Gullis Sarah Atherton Maria Caulfield Adam Holloway Jake Berry David Jones Anne Marie Morris Ross Thomson Alan Amos Marco Longhi Aidan Burley Andrea Jenkyns Lucy Allan All former Conservatives. At some point “Tory 2.0” stops being an insult and becomes the attendance register.

@TheHolmesFront Apart from Scott Benton and Andrew Brigden and all the other ex Tories in Restore?

Only Rupert Lowe can save Labour.

What happened to Reform’s famous live membership counter? Remember the counter? Nigel Farage loved it. Reform supporters loved it. It was splashed across the website as proof of unstoppable momentum. It became a political weapon. Farage used it to boast that Reform had overtaken the Conservatives. Kemi Badenoch called the numbers fake. Farage hit back. The row became part of Reform’s “we are replacing the Tories” story. The message was simple: Look at the number. Watch it rise. Join the movement. This is history happening live. But where is it now? Reform’s website still claims 270k+ members, but the precise live counter appears to have vanished. The exact, always-moving number has been replaced by a safer rounded claim. That matters. Because archived snapshots tell a more awkward story. By late December and January, the counter was not roaring upwards. It was hovering around the same level. It moved up. It moved down. It stalled. Some archive captures show: 270,926 on 16 December 271,188 on 20 December 271,113 on 23 December 270,917 on 29 December 270,924 on 5 January 270,748 on 8 January 270,729 on 10 January 270,729 on 13 January 271,610 on 19 January That is not the clean story Reform spent months selling. That is a membership figure bumping around the same band. And once a live counter stops behaving like a victory parade, it stops being useful propaganda and starts becoming evidence. This is the problem with turning a membership number into a public performance. When it rises, you look unstoppable. When it stalls, everyone can see it. When it drops, even slightly, the story changes. Suddenly the question is not “How fast is Reform growing?” It becomes: Who is leaving? Who is not renewing? Who joined during the hype and drifted away? How many are active? How many are legacy annual subscribers? How many joined for insurgency and found Tory 2.0 waiting at the door? That last question matters. Reform’s brand was built on being the revolt against the old Conservative machine. But the more former Tory MPs, ministers and establishment figures it absorbs, the harder that story becomes to sustain. Some joined Reform because they were sick of the Conservatives. They wanted something new. Not a turquoise refuge centre for the same political class that gave Britain record migration, high taxes, broken housing, weak borders and public services in permanent crisis. So when Reform recruits more of the people associated with that failure, it should not be shocking if some grassroots members ask whether they have been sold a rebrand rather than a revolution. Then came Restore. Restore now claims more than 130,000 members. Not all of those will be ex-Reform, of course. Nobody serious should pretend they are. But it is equally silly to pretend there has been no political movement at all. Restore is clearly attracting people who think Reform has become too cautious, too compromised, too personality-led and too comfortable with the old Tory world. That is what makes the missing live counter interesting. If Reform is still genuinely surging, why not keep the exact live number front and centre? Why move from a precise public counter to the much safer “270k+”? Why retire the theatre when the theatre was so useful? Perhaps the answer is innocent. Perhaps it was just a website redesign. Perhaps the number is still perfectly healthy. Fine. Then publish the exact current paid-up figure. Publish the monthly joins and lapses. Publish how many cancelled. Publish how many failed to renew. Publish how many are active members rather than legacy annual subscribers waiting for renewal. And explain why the live counter, once treated as proof of unstoppable momentum, quietly gave way to the safer and vaguer “270k+”. Reform were happy for the country to stare at the counter when it made them look unstoppable. They cannot object if people keep looking now. Useful when it rose. Awkward when it stopped.

Camilla Tominey interviews Makerfield local on the doorstep about his voting intentions. Another for Restore. Seems he is switched on.💥💥

Vote splitting under first-past-the-post is real. The question is why Reform assumes every anti-Labour vote belongs to Reform by default. That is the part never explained. If voters broadly wanted the same thing, Reform would not be spending half its time attacking Restore supporters for refusing to obey. Some of us do not see recycled Tory machinery, vague delivery plans and Farage personality politics as the same direction of change. A vote for Restore is not a vote for Labour. It is a refusal to be herded into Tory 2.0 because Reform thinks it has inherited national discontent.

@SuellaBraverman But she is still a Tory.

Thank you.

@MagriTiger @Harmony1654551 @reformparty_uk @RestoreBritain Still a lovely person 😊

@TheHolmesFront @Harmony1654551 @reformparty_uk @RestoreBritain Cunt

@MagriTiger @Harmony1654551 @reformparty_uk @RestoreBritain Lovely person 💕

To be clear , I literally don't want any of you cunts in Reform When half your supporters realise Lowe isn't the far right Nazi they think he is ,although he tells them everyday ,in between millions must go ,you can all fuck off back to BNP ,Britain First etc & enjoy your time on X whining like little bitches as before