Tom Henry

Just reposting to pin back to the top. Haven't gotten the chance to really work on it. But the idea is to have this website be the place that formalizes my ideas, about the world, life, the past, the future. What's needed to actually solve the problems in the world.

@BigTech404 @___ZELIG___ @LucasGageX So we should be able to devise unity in the opposite of what I just described. Since that's just a sad bleak pitiful world. Why would we want that? How could that say be "The Good?" So we should be figuring out how to fit into that opposite world of everything being the same.

@BigTech404 @___ZELIG___ @LucasGageX Instead there's nothing to learn, because everything's the same, doing the same thing. So there's never gonna be anyone winning or losing. So what would you be learning? Nothing. You'll also see nothing new, because nothing can do anything different.

Here is a clear example within Hume's Gillotine argument, why PIE from @LucasGageX fails as just another clever attempt that fails to escape Hume:

@BigTech404 @___ZELIG___ @LucasGageX You can't tolerate everyone, if they aren't gonna tolerate you. You're then just punching yourself in the face, letting in invaders who will destroy you. Thinking they're gonna reciprocate, no they're not. That's why you shouldn't even get to that point.

@BigTech404 @___ZELIG___ @LucasGageX It's like I don't know, it just seems like common sense to me. If you don't stand for anything, you will eventually lose to people who do stand for something. So, the only way that philosophy can live, is to get EVERYONE to not stand for anything. Like, this is just communism.