Felonius Antonius

@dearaunty @JamesHeartfield Participation trophies at school? Being spoilt rotten by wealthy parents?

@JamesHeartfield They really seem to believe they can waft their way through life with no consequences at all to actions, where has this arrogance come from?

Palestine Action activists sued: “I smashed up these guys’ business, and I can’t believe that they want me to pay for the damage!” theguardian.com/uk-news/2026/a…

@ainsley100 @ManaByte They left the buggy behind, Neil, on three lunar missions (Apollos 15, 16, and 17). The buggies, descent modules and other equipment have since been photographed in situ by lunar orbiters from the USA, China, India and Japan.

@ManaByte Show me a photo of a flat earth ? This is the photo you want to propose as evidence of a moon landing .. how did they get the buggy back ? Straw man nonsense

There is a reason people do not debate Flat Earthers or Moon landing deniers. It is not because the evidence is weak. It is because the conversation is rigged from the start. You can bring measurements, physics, engineering, independent tracking, international verification, and experiments they can do in their own backyard, and none of it matters. The moment the facts show up, they shout fake, edited, CGI, conspiracy, or “that’s just your belief.” You cannot debate someone who treats every piece of evidence as invalid by default. You cannot debate someone who demands proof and then rejects the proof the second it appears. You cannot debate someone who thinks their personal disbelief outranks measurable reality. A debate requires both sides to accept evidence. Flat Earth and Moon landing denial collapse the moment evidence enters the room, so the only move left is to deny the room exists. That is why people do not debate them. Not because the globe is fragile, but because the argument they bring is. You cannot have a real discussion with someone who decided ahead of time that nothing you show them will ever count.

@jimmythetwitt @BDSixsmith It's possible to believe that Brigid Delaney is their in-house comedian, but there are so many crazy headlines you realise that all the Guardian writers must be insane.

@TonyFelonius @BDSixsmith 🤣🤣 how is this rag still in circulation?

This has to be the most Guardiany headline to have ever Guardianed.

@HBrubanter This seems inconsistent, Herb. Why not build a dam across the Strait of Hormuz to teach the Iranians a lesson?

Britains foremost motorcycling dam enthusiast H. Brubanter calls for Strait of Hormuz to be fully reopened.

@Andercot 29.9792458 is also the IQ of a typical pyramidiot.

It's the latitude of the Pyramid of Giza 299,792,458 m/s 29.9792458° N

@luongas @Andercot Nonsense.

@Andercot In response to the other post saying it’s an arbitrary human number, yes it is, but any other type of equivalent numbers we would have used, or any intelligent race would have used, would have still have those two numbers matched up.

@Fatbaldbloke1 Rookie error.

Bet they're Choughed with that.

@IvanOoze420 @Polymarket Dogs will be happier to take them.

@Polymarket Why does the flavor matter why is that the headline

JUST IN: Beef-flavored pill that can extend the life of a dog by several years set to hit the market next year.

@dewsenblurry @Polymarket Beef flavoured, not beef.

@Polymarket *Unless your dog has allergies to BEEF because they carry the PURINE allergy, most commonly found in HUA Dalmatians or piebald pattern (spotted pink-belly skin) dogs. Please be careful - this could easily cause so many problems.

@Ihatesteaksauce @Polymarket You may have missed the point here. The dog will not become old and stay old for longer. It will stay youthful for longer.

@Polymarket You ever seen an 18 year old dog? Can barely see, shaking as they walk, just staring at you cause they forgot where they are. No thank you! Rest in Peace Fluffy, I’m not gonna do that to you

@ClimateWarrior7 There are tears of joy in my eyes right now. How did you know I live in Regency ward in Brighton?

To the naysayers: yes, I can effectively govern this region from Tuscany.

@cwhitlock1986 @RupertMyers Yes, I didn't see that at the time. I imagine he's still missing his MP salary.

@TonyFelonius @RupertMyers He's definitely farming... there are loads of others who have posted the same thing, word for word.

Andrew’s sharing slop for clicks. Don’t be Andrew. Here are the photos from Apollo 8 and Artemis II

@ArmchairAdml @serenelyjoyful Don’t forget our Prime Minister is Keir Starmer, who would be unlikely to order the Falklands to be defended.

There’s a common misconception that the UK would be unable to defend the Falklands against an Argentinian invasion. Bollocks! The argument I'm seeing is that the Royal Navy is not, shall we say, in ideal shape, and therefore Britain couldn’t mount a successful defence. However, unlike 1982, it’s highly unlikely that the situation would even escalate to the point of needing a full naval task force. Argentina’s current military capabilities are extremely limited. Their Air Force has just 40 combat aircraft — including 23 ageing A-4 Skyhawks and only 6 F-16s — supported by a mere two KC-130 tankers. Their Navy consists of three small destroyers (around 3,600 tonnes each), two reportedly inactive submarines, and a handful of patrol vessels. These numbers alone make a successful invasion highly unlikely. The Falklands lie roughly 340 miles from the Argentine mainland, and any attempt at a surprise attack would be almost impossible to achieve or conceal. The existing Typhoon detachment on the islands would be reinforced by additional Typhoons, F-35s, and tankers before they'd even left the ground. In short, the idea that Britain could not defend the Falklands is nonsense — because Argentina lacks anything close to the capability needed to invade them in the first place.

@ClimateWarrior7 I certainly wouldn't want my pods entering anything at 22 times the speed of sound.

I want to go on record as saying that entering the Earth's atmosphere at 22 times the speed of sound doesn't seem like a good idea to me.

@genuine_m_ @capedjoosader Yes, traditionally milk in first was non-U and last was U.

@capedjoosader I understood it to be a class thing. What you said but only because you couldn't afford good quality china.

The correct method is milk first. Why ? Because porcelain tea cups were very fragile and adding boiling water could cause them to crack. Placing milk first ment that the liquid was instantly cooled

@durham_trev Man's drink. Coke is for girlies.

I don’t, it’s fcuking horrible!

@Battsby @PaulReadGB And the 'jam or cream first on scones' debate is just trying to foment civil war between Devon and Cornwall.

@PaulReadGB Yep. I am also done with the tea debate!

I'm bored with the pensions argument now and won't be engaging further. It's clearly deliberately engineered to cause division.

@justice_Tyr22 'News in Brief' in Scientific American appeas to be written much more colloquially these days than back in my day.

Dolphin Pussy Jelly is the new way for women to do us in. 😳🙄🤣

@Fatbaldbloke1 Yes, and he alighted on mass immigration as the best way to achieve this.

@TonyFelonius Good Lord😦

Why does he keep saying he "Acts in the national interest"? That should be a given mate, you're feckin PM. The fact you feel you need to keep saying it is deeply suspicious 😦