TrueCrimeFanGirl

If you missed the live yesterday and want to get a comprehensive breakdown of the law and what must be proven and who must prove it…come and get it. 😊 PART 2 - Read & Kearney SUED: Koskoff's $1.4 Billion Sandy Hook Firm Fil... youtube.com/live/Wk5XRr-lb… via @YouTube

@Will428304 @Janette45817947 The fucking shoe 🤣🤣🤣🤣

If/when they sue me, can I get discovery about the shoe?

@ThrillaRilla369 💯

Do you really believe that dogs can sense "bad people"?

@Jojob8709645169 @MafiaMasshole

@TrueCrimeFanGrl @MafiaMasshole The truth is in your face and you refuse to see it. You’re in a cult

I have to point out again, how incredibly fucked up it is that Meredith O'Neil has been blamed baselessly for "hacking" to obtain and release these clips, when it is abudantly obvious Kearney screen recorded and released them himself.

@SaltySteno Where is the victim?

Saying this about a victim is actually crazy….

@MafiaMasshole Isn’t it ironic the the first repost came from an actual sexual deviant?

Yeah well unhinged sexual deviants usually do make people nervous

@Heather_Nos @DonutsBaga Yes all these things…

@TrueCrimeFanGrl @DonutsBaga I thought that same thing. I've been to an officers funeral and there are many moments that are beautiful (and immensely tragic) but taking a picture of yourself there in a group hang is odd to me. I get taking a picture of the procession, it's unique.

@MLFPinkLady Check that out @MafiaMasshole , I WAS right. 🤣🤣🤣

@DonutsBaga I guess, but it wouldn’t cross my mind to ever have a photo op at a funeral.

@TrueCrimeFanGrl To prove they were there and get social credit.

@MafiaMasshole There is no speculation on my part, just you trying to deflect.

@TrueCrimeFanGrl So now you're just speculating. Okie dokie.

@MafiaMasshole It was either her who sent it or she sent it to the Koala and he sent it to you, either way it came from her.

@TrueCrimeFanGrl If you did, you would know she's not the one who sent it to me. So, you don't.

@MafiaMasshole Knock it off Kate, this isn’t one of Nina’s spaces, we know the truth.

@TrueCrimeFanGrl Well, she wasn't, so you clearly don't know shit. 🤣

@antonisanchezx @Lawferio @barrymiller128 @Table327 Neither do you or Nan, Sanchez.

@Lawferio @barrymiller128 @Table327 Karen had a new number. Aidan doesn't have it.

Respectfully, there are so many false claims in your diatribe, I’ve made a list: ❌**False: The “John O’Keefe died inside the house” narrative is “untethered from evidence” and “falls apart” when you look at location data, step data, temperature, or movement.** These data points were heavily contested at both trials. Defense experts and analysts showed GPS/location data can fail inside houses (especially basements or dead zones), the 36 “steps” at 12:31–12:32 a.m. could reflect a struggle or later movement, and battery-temperature drop is inconclusive depending on where the phone was carried or placed. The jury in the 2025 retrial clearly did **not** find the prosecution’s interpretation bulletproof — they acquitted Karen Read of murder, manslaughter, and leaving the scene. ❌**False: The house-guest theory was pushed as “fact” with zero evidence.** The theory was built on trial evidence: Jen McCabe’s 2:27 a.m. Google search “hos long to die in cold” (hours before the body was “found”), deleted texts, multiple witnesses’ changing stories, Brian Higgins and Brian Albert ditching phones the day before they were to be turned in, injuries on O’Keefe (arm bruises, head trauma) that two separate expert teams said were inconsistent with a 24-mph car strike, and the complete lack of O’Keefe’s DNA or blood in or on Read’s SUV taillight until after it was allegedly “planted.” That’s why a jury acquitted her. ❌**False: The people in the house are proven “innocent” and were just “targeted, harassed, and defamed.”** No one has been charged with O’Keefe’s murder, but the jury’s acquittal of Read means the Commonwealth failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that a car strike outside was what killed him. Reasonable doubt exists precisely because of the evidence pointing toward the Albert home. Reporting on sworn testimony, forensic disputes, and police-investigation failures is not defamation — it’s protected speech about a public criminal case. ❌*False: This lawsuit is just like the Alex Jones Sandy Hook cases.** Alex Jones admitted under oath that he knew Sandy Hook was real and that he lied for years to profit. He defaulted on liability in multiple cases. No one in the “house theory” camp has admitted the theory is a knowing lie. They cite trial evidence the jury ultimately found created reasonable doubt. Equating the two is false equivalence. ❌**False: Falsely accusing people of murder is what happened here.** The accusations against McCabe, the Alberts, and Higgins were based on public trial testimony, forensic reports, and digital evidence presented in open court. After two trials and a full acquittal on the murder charges, the public still has every right to question what actually happened to John O’Keefe — especially since the Commonwealth has never charged anyone else. ❌**False: This lawsuit is a “watershed moment” that will silence YouTubers/Lawtubers for “turning tragedy into content.”** The suit is narrowly against Karen Read and Aidan Kearney, not every commentator. Criticizing witnesses or prosecutors based on trial evidence is core First Amendment activity. The Alex Jones strategy worked because he admitted fabrications; that doesn’t apply here. You pretend the prosecution’s theory is undisputed scientific fact when a Massachusetts jury already rejected it (twice). That’s why the house-guest theory persists — not because of “fan fiction,” but because the Commonwealth’s own evidence and witnesses created massive reasonable doubt.

@factsdontlie10 Kinda missed having her and her bad legal analysis around 🤣🤣🤣 it’s always good for a laugh

The YouTube / TikTok wanna-be lawyer is at it again. And continues to be wrong! Also her daughter was knocking on the door during filming to which she ignored her and said she was working…… cringe AF 🥴

@little_foot777 @watulookinkdat She probably turned on him because after all that time, he still wouldn’t let her suck his dick. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

I've spoken to him twice in my life so no, he definitely never let me suck his dick. Also, I remember when YOU were doing the exact same thing as I am. So it's interesting to me that you flipped. Predictable, but not surprising. You know as well as I do that he doesn't deserve the shit storm that has come his way. You are working solely on emotion Jen. You've become no different than a McAlbert or an AFKR troll that you, yourself, seemingly hated for what, 2 years of your life? Did he say something to piss you off? Because there's no way you went from a position even more so a "turtlerider" than I have ever been, to whatever you are now, over MO. There's no way. And in regards to your comment, you're the one that was close to him and hung out with him and then turned on him for God knows what reason. I'd say, of the 2 of us, you girlie, had the means, time, chance, an motivation. So tell me Jen, did he let YOU suck his dick?😂😂I simply feel like he's being accused of crimes he didn't do.

I'm just gonna remind all the people with TBDS, this shit is gonna make him more popular than EVER. His face is gonna be EVERYWHERE!! So those of you that hate him, better get ready, because it's about to be Hurricane Aidan!! And yall are gonna be so mad, and it's gonna be fucking hilarious!! I just thought I'd bring that up.🤣🤣 #FreeTurtleboy #TurtleboyAllUpInThisBitch #HurricaneAidan #TBDS

@mensfa99 @TweetyChick71 Did she really unblock me and come back to make another comment?! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@TweetyChick71 @TrueCrimeFanGrl I think you missed the point . Nobody should make fun of anyone’s appearance . I never made fun of you . Just said it’s bizarre someone with such a pizzaz for style shouldn’t judge others .

Who wants to tell her?! 🤣🤣🤣🤣

@jessmachadoshow Congratulations 💕🐰💕🐰

This was a fun benchmark to reach. Post by post, thread by thread. THANK YOU!