Patrick Ticer

@randomovski @vixmcintyre @KatelynTweeter Yes and I sincerely appreciate your participation. Scientist also tend to concur that an embryo is a new, separate organism. But with that said, I am leaving the conversation. I wish you a pleasant day, both @randomovski and @vixmcintyre

@vixmcintyre @UnhingedMuppets @KatelynTweeter Yes it is human because it has separate genome which is not mother's nor father's but separate human genome @vixmcintyre @UnhingedMuppets am I right?

Pro-aborties be like: self control ❌️ killing someone ✅️

@LuanaGoriss :amused: Nah. I will no more give your opinion weight than I would a person who claimed that the world was flat or that he was a reincarnated egg-plant. 🙂

The intent of Jesus and his disciples was to make converts to Judaism. There was no plan for another religion. Matthew 28:19 translated from the Aramaic: "Go, therefore, and convert all nations…” Convert to what? There was no ‘Christianity’ at that time. Convert the nations to Judaism, of course. And this is what the Judean disciples did. Over the next 300+ years, there were so many converts to Judaism that in the 4th century CE., Constantine and later Byzantine emperors issued laws and the death penalty for Gentiles who converted to Judaism. Let that sink in.

@ThePiperPie They don't think that they do. They simply lack self awareness...like many cultists.

If Atheism isn't a religion, why do they proselytize?

@vixmcintyre @randomovski @KatelynTweeter I am sure that you are engaging at your Molech cocktail parties. I engaged with you this long only because I found your light hearted, misanthropic narcissism morbidly fascinating. Beneath your clever banter you are a caricature. You grow tiresome. Good day, madam. 🙂

@UnhingedMuppets @randomovski @KatelynTweeter Why would we need to “dehumanise” them? Do humans get to be inside the body of other humans who don’t want them there?🤔

:still amused: I stand corrected, Mrs. McIntyre; my apologies. My suspicion about the quality of your character is also validated. I sincerely thank you. I also want to thank you for confirming my proposed theory that people like you must first dehumanize the developing human being that you are intentionally killing. Your progressive 'spirit animal' is a serial killer. Good day to you, Mrs. McIntyre. 🙂

@randomovski @UnhingedMuppets @KatelynTweeter It’s not illegal, a foetus is not a person, it’s the intentional *ending of a pregnancy* and there’s no malice aforethought soooo… it does not meet the definition in any way at all

You are an obtuse, oblivious, lost creature and a willing sock puppet of your father, Satan. I have given you multiple opportunities to just take your "victory", run back to your unborn baby killing friends and gloat about how you "showed that misogynistic, Bible believing so and so" what was what. But you simply won't go away voluntarily. Blocking you now.

@UnhingedMuppets @LiveAction You have no basis for your beliefs beyond a misogynistic control fetish

It is evil to kill a preborn baby at 24 weeks. It is evil to kill a preborn baby at 20 weeks. It is evil to kill a preborn baby at 15 weeks. It is evil to kill a preborn baby at 10 weeks. It is evil to kill a preborn baby at 5 weeks. It is evil to kill a preborn baby. Period.

Thank you for this thought provoking post Mr. Curcio. If I am understanding correctly, your position is that one must be baptized by water immersion and by the Holy Spirit in order to enter into the kingdom of God. Is that correct? Whereas my understanding of His allusion to being 'born of water' is the same as Nicodemus' - natural birth. I base that on my belief that God says what He means to say and there is no reason to move beyond the plain statement unless it is clearly not meant as literal. Romans 10:9 states that the only two requirements of salvation are public declaration of Whom Jesus is, and undeniable, unquestioning understanding that God raised Him from the dead. (I paraphrased 'believe in your heart' this way because I want make sure that it is understood that I do not mean any form of 'because that just feels right'.) I use Dismas as one proof for this salvation requirement; scripture does not tell us that he was water baptised. I understand that you believe differently, and I am not arguing with you, sir. Just trying to explain why I believe what I believe and the reason(s) for it.

The worst exegesis I've ever heard in my life is the baptist understanding of John 3:5. Many argue that the water refers to the natural birth and the spirit the second birth. This means that according to them Jesus is saying, "To be born again, you first must be born." But proper exegesis shows that the water in verse 5 is the same water in verse 23 and is in connection to baptism. But baptists can't admit this for they're forced to concede their entire paradigm. Compare the water in verse 5 with verse 23 in connection to baptism, John 3:5, "Jesus answered, “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born of water and the Spirit he cannot enter into the kingdom of God." John 3:22-23, "John also was baptizing in Aenon near Salim, because there was much water there; and people were coming and were being baptized."

I understand your point, but I would suggest that it is situationally dependent on the tone of the conversation. Our default should be to counter an honest question or misunderstanding with love and patience. However, there are times when bluntness, mocking or even outright scorn are appropriate. Jesus mockingly and derisively called the Pharisees a 'brood of vipers'. John the Baptist called both the Pharisees and Sadducees the same. Elijah mocked the Ba'al worshippers about their little 'g' god being on the toilet. This is only my opinion and approach and if you disagree that is perfectly fine. 🙂

Christians: Even if someone’s theology on here is genuinely bad, mockery is not a fruit of the Spirit. You don’t have the right to tear down those Christ died for. It’s unbecoming for any believer and even more so for pastors and biblical counselors. Truth doesn’t need juvenile bullies to defend it.

Understanding niceties is not your strong suit. I will be blunt. I am finished discussing this with you. I told you what I believe and why I believe it. It was not a contest. I do not care if you tell yourself that you "won". Pat yourself on the back and grab a cookie. Good day. 🙂

@UnhingedMuppets @LiveAction Spare mirror or false sanctimony and ill meant prayers🤡 You have no valid argument, and cannot prove any of the claims you have made. You lose. And neither God, nor Jesus ever said a single word against abortion. Trying to make the Bible mean what you want it to is blasphemy

@missxlayy @NataniaMarshall I don't care about positions of power that other nations allow their gender confused people. It is none of my business. I only care about what happens in mine, since I have to live here. I don't know you. I will never meet you. Your opinion is irrelevant to me.

@UnhingedMuppets @NataniaMarshall your brain must be a brick bc trans ppl make up less than 2% of society in the most accepting of nations, absolutely no power to sway any elections or policy making. you just can't realize you have become a worm & the majority of cis ppl see you transphobes as nothing but bait 🎣

The men that say you can become a woman by cross dressing, putting on makeup, going through hormone therapy and other forms of treatment. Tend to forget that they have NO capability to get pregnant, give birth, and have periods. The fact that you would need to go through feminizing hormone therapy shows. Men who genuinely believe this NEED help.

@Renatta This description in no way fully encapsulates what I felt when I clicked your post: Intense overwhelming sadness for a man I have never heard of and loved ones whom I will never meet in this lifetime hurt me to the point that tears welled up.

So sad. Pray for their loved ones, especially their children who have to be experiencing unimaginable pain right now. 💔

:smiling: Your opinion is nothing compared to my God's Holiness. That said, I truly pity you. I have prayed for you. I genuinely hope that you kneel before God at the Bema Seat in humbleness and gratitude. I sincerely pray that you do not kneel before Him at the Great White throne in terror and regret. Have a nice day, Miss Business. 🙂 I appreciate your time.

@UnhingedMuppets @LiveAction Your opinions, like you, IRL, are irrelevant. You have failed to prove that abortion is “murder”. Or that women have no right to defend themselves against harm and non-consensual use. You have no valid argument

Very tongue in cheek, completely irreverent, and only meant to amuse those of you who share my dark, bemused sense of humor: Miss Thunberg is desperately clinging to any straws she can. If she cannot remain "relevant" the only other future she has is to be a failed Only Fans model.

Greta seems upset. Quick, some get her another sandwich!

Addendum to my original post: Legally, the DOJ defines 'murder' as the unlawful killing of a human being with malice. Since abortion is not illegal, I don't mind changing the term from 'murder' to either 'kill' or 'intentionally ending the life of another human being'. So, when an abortion is performed for any other reason than to save the life of the mother, an abortionist is intentionally killing another human being, or is intentionally ending the life of another human being and the mother is being a willing participant. I am perfectly content with this revision. I believe that it validates my original assertion about pro choicers' need to dehumanize the developing human being.

@KatelynTweeter Only they lack the courage to actually call it "murder". They dehumanize their victims just like serial killers do.

Yes, sir. As a tangent, or just musing as coffee settles in: I wonder why this is and the reasons for it. Maybe a large part of the success of chicanery versus people not seeing it for the deception it is hinges on the simple fact that some percentage of believers simply do not believe in actual "spirits"? I suggest this because of a tendency among many to allegorize what the Bible tells us in the US specifically and in the West in general: - Jesus didn't really drive out demons; He healed the mentally ill, but His audience wasn't mature enough/too primitive to understand. - An evil being called Satan is "an ideal", not a genuine malevolent being who hates humanity. In contrast peoples in other countries genuinely believe in demons, spirits, curses and everything that the Bible tells us is a reality.

@UnhingedMuppets I’m with you in some regards. I have encountered the true activity of the Holy Spirit stateside but I have also been in many places and thought- this is not the Holy Spirit.

There is no biblical case for Cessationism. There are only verses some point to and try to make a case from. It isn’t NEVER stated by the apostles or even hinted at. You want me to believe Jesus planned for the gifts of the Spirit labeled in 1 Cor. 14 to stop after the apostles died, right when the Church would need them most? No. Cessationism is a sad Western doctrine for people who do not have the courage to walk in the gifts unless everything can be explained, measured, and controlled. But you do not control the Holy Spirit. Go live in a third world country for a year and see how active the gifts still are and how desperate the church needs them to function in this very hour. Paul on the contrary encourages believers “Pursue love, yet desire earnestly spiritual gifts, but especially that you may prophesy. — 1 Corinthians 14:1 This is because Jesus taught Paul about the gifts.

To refer to me as you have infers a nonexistent familiarity; I find your assumption amusing. If you meant it as an insult, that is both amusing and informative as to your character. 🙂 Legally, the DOJ defines 'murder' as the unlawful killing of a human being with malice. Since it isn't illegal, I don't mind changing the term from 'murder' to either 'kill' or 'intentionally ending the life of another human being'. So, when an abortion is performed for any other reason than to save the life of the mother, an abortionist is intentionally killing another human being, or is intentionally ending the life of another human being and the mother is being a willing participant. If that makes you think it is less monstrous and you can sleep at night knowing that you don't support 'murder', I personally think that your moral compass is broken. That there are people with broken moral compasses is the entire reason why Jesus came to earth and chose to take our deserved punishment upon His shoulders and exchange places. I will pray that you find the Lord and that He heals your seared conscience. 🙂 Good day, Miss McIntyre.

@UnhingedMuppets @KatelynTweeter That’s because it’s not murder, Paddy. Here is the definition of murder. I’ve highlighted ways in which abortion isn’t murder. Hope that helps! Also, why would it be necessary to “dehumanise” anyone? Do you think humans get to be inside unwilling bodies?

Jew Hate is DEMONIC! youtu.be/gIF14afZAm4?si… via @YouTube

If you honestly think that is what I meant, then I explained the point I attempted to make poorly. I apologize for any confusion. I do not think that God's enemies are His brothers. The brothers and sisters in Matt 12:50 can only refer to born again believers. These believers are doing the work of the Father because of the indwelling of the Holy Spirit.

@UnhingedMuppets @JesusSaves1500 :shrug: You said God’s enemies are Christ’s brothers

Baptism is a command for:

I used to think that Catholics were just another part of Bible believing Christians, but odd. Since I started interacting with them I am mostly convinced that the HRCC is a cult. They ignore clear scripture and jump through numerous hoops to allegorize what is clearly meant literally. What they cannot pervert by that method they insist has already happened, almost always in 70 AD. What cannot be allegorized, or placed in 70 AD and has no support for anywhere in any of the 66 books common to both Catholics and Non-Denom/Protestant branches they declare is Sacred Tradition. I have no doubt that there are saved, born again Catholics out there. I further have no doubt that those people are saved only through God's Grace and His knowledge of whom really seeks him and not at all saved through anything the HRCC taught.

It's sad how many Catholics like this guy are Biblically illiterate. The Jewish apostle Paul - himself a Benjamite Israelite who persecuted the early believers - asks the exact question he's raising in Romans 11:1 'I ask then: Did God reject his people? By no means! I am an Israelite myself, a descendant of Abraham, from the tribe of Benjamin.' In verse 2: 'God did not reject his people, whom he foreknew.' Paul then explains the mystery: a partial hardening has come upon Israel until the full number of Gentiles has come in, and in this way all Israel will be saved (Romans 11:25–26). The covenants and gifts of God to Israel are irrevocable (Romans 11:29). Israel remains 'beloved' on account of the patriarchs (Romans 11:28). This is not my opinion - it's the inspired Word of the Jewish Messiah's chosen apostle. John 8:44 ('You are of your father the devil'): Yeshua was speaking to a specific group of Pharisees and religious leaders who had just claimed Abraham as their father while plotting to kill Him (John 8:31, 37, 40, 59). He was addressing their actions and unbelief, not every Jewish person by ethnicity. Yeshua, His disciples, the apostles, and thousands of first-century Jews did believe in Him. The same chapter begins with 'the Jews who had believed in him' (v. 31). This is not a blanket curse on the Jewish people. Matthew 21:43 ('The kingdom of God will be taken away from you and given to a people who will produce its fruit'): This is the Parable of the Wicked Tenants, told directly to 'the chief priests and the elders of the people' and 'the Pharisees' (Matthew 21:23, 45). The 'tenants' are the corrupt religious leadership who rejected the owner's son (Jesus) The vineyard is still Israel (see Isaiah 5:1–7), but stewardship of the kingdom shifts from those leaders to the faithful remnant - which has always included Jews (the apostles, the early Messianic community) plus believing Gentiles. This is not God damning the entire Jewish people or revoking His covenants with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. Matthew 5:20 (righteousness exceeding that of the scribes and Pharisees): Yeshua was teaching His Jewish disciples on a hillside in Galilee how to live as citizens of the Kingdom. He was raising the bar for everyone - including us today - not pronouncing eternal national damnation. Vatican II's Nostra Aetate (1965) explicitly rejected the idea that Jews are 'rejected or accursed by God.' It states that 'God holds the Jews most dear for the sake of their Fathers' and 'does not repent of the gifts He makes or of the calls He issues.' The Church receives its spiritual nourishment from the 'root' of that olive tree (Israel) into which Gentile believers are grafted (Romans 11:17–18). Paul warns Gentiles right there: 'Do not be arrogant toward the branches.' The pattern in Scripture is consistent: God disciplines Israel for unfaithfulness (as He has done throughout the Tanakh), but He never abandons or damns the nation He chose. The New Covenant (Jeremiah 31:31–34) is made with 'the house of Israel and the house of Judah' - and Yeshua the Messiah is the mediator of that covenant for Jew and Gentile alike. The Church is not a 'replacement' for Israel; rather they are wild olive branches grafted into Israel's root. The natural branches (Jewish people) are being grafted back in even now through faith in the Messiah. To claim 'God damns Israel' is to call God a liar about His own covenants and to ignore the very apostle who wrote half the New Testament. Yeshua wept over Jerusalem and said He would return when the Jewish people say, 'Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord' (Matthew 23:39). Paul longed for his 'kinsmen according to the flesh' to be saved (Romans 9:1–3). Antisemitism - hatred or cursing of the Jewish people - has zero place in the life of anyone who follows the Jewish Messiah.

International hypocrisy, especially when these charges are coming from within organizations such as the U.N. This is the same group of wackadoodles that gave the world UNWRA, the 'oil for food' program, and placed countries with terrible human rights practices on the committees overlooking human rights.

@owenjonesjourno Calling Israel “genocidal” while ignoring terrorists who target civilians isn’t brave, it’s reckless spin. Israel defends its people, period. The obsession says more about the critics than about Israel.

Israel has committed genocide. That is the consensus of genocide scholars, including Israeli scholars. Genocide is the crime of crimes. Stop pretending Israel is being randomly picked on. It chose to commit the worst possible crime that exists. The end!