Utkarsh

29 posts

Utkarsh banner
Utkarsh

Utkarsh

@Utkarsh32192205

I am a Hustler and a Learner 📈

เข้าร่วม Haziran 2025
11 กำลังติดตาม5 ผู้ติดตาม
Utkarsh รีทวีตแล้ว
TheTrustedProp
TheTrustedProp@TheTrustedProp·
Years of trust… and one unverified person’s words were enough to break that. That hurts more than people realize. And this didn’t just affect MFFU. It also damaged our relationship with many firms and even impacted giveaway accounts that were meant for our community through TheTrustedProp. This is what hurts the most: We were one of the few genuinely trying to help MCF victims recover. We used our network. Our time. Our resources. Our reputation. And in return? Threats. Lies. Broken trust. Damaged partnerships. The saddest part is this makes us question helping people in the future. Because one bad-faith actor can ruin opportunities for dozens of genuine traders who actually deserve support. We’re not posting this for sympathy. We’re posting this because our community deserves the truth. We helped because we cared. We kept our word. 100+ traders can prove that. And we’ll let the facts speak for themselves. @FabioMFFU @MattLeech
English
2
3
11
615
Utkarsh รีทวีตแล้ว
TheTrustedProp
TheTrustedProp@TheTrustedProp·
We stayed silent for a long time because we didn’t want drama. We thought this could be solved privately. But after repeated threats, false accusations, and damage to our name, we owe our community the full truth. When MCF collapsed, a lot of traders were left stranded. People lost money, accounts, and trust. It was chaos. We didn’t have to step in. But we did. Because we know how much traders sacrifice for this journey. We made a promise: even traders who didn’t buy through our coupon code would still be considered for compensation. And we kept that promise. To this day, 100+ traders have already received accounts through our efforts. And we weren’t the only ones helping. @FundingPips stepped in. Their CEO personally gave out $1,000 instant accounts to MCF-affected traders. @WenCryptoTrade also stepped in to support traders. That’s important because it shows one thing clearly: The was support available everywhere. So why would we need to “take” or misuse accounts from anyone when the whole industry was stepping up? One trader approached us claiming he was affected by MCF and wanted help. Like we do with everyone, we asked for proof. The emails he gave us did not show anywhere on our affiliate dashboard. That was already strange. Still, because we had promised to help even non-code users, we gave him the benefit of the doubt. We didn’t ignore him. We took his case seriously. We reached out to MCF directly with the 4+ emails he provided and waited for confirmation. During this time, our support team spent hours talking to him, keeping him updated, trying to help. When MCF guy replied, we were shocked. All 4 emails he gave us were not even registered with MCF. That was the first moment everything started falling apart. Instead of clearing things up, he started buying time. Saying things like: “I can keep your mouth shut” while claiming he had proof. When we asked him to show even ONE proper email with sender and receiver visible, he refused. His reason? “Privacy.” Privacy… of an email address we already had? Later he sent screenshots. But the account number was blurred. The one thing that could actually verify ownership. Why blur the only proof that matters? We even questioned this directly. Because at that point, even a passed account could have been enough for us to verify. But still, nothing clear was shown. And despite all of this… we still helped him. He received an account from a firm as part of our effort to help MCF-affected traders. That should have been the end of it. A trader affected gets compensated and moves on. That’s what we wanted. And here’s something important people need to understand. When we told him that FundingPips, through its CEO, was giving $1,000 instant accounts as part of the MCF recovery support… his response wasn’t gratitude. His response was: “1K acc is a slap. At least give me a $25k account straight.” That hit us hard. Because it showed he didn’t even understand that this was a collective effort of multiple companies stepping in just to help traders recover. This wasn’t about “how much can I get?” It was about getting traders back on their feet. FundingPips helped. WenCrypto helped. Many firms helped. We helped. But instead of seeing that support for what it was, the focus became: “That’s not enough.” Here’s the contradiction: He claims we promised him an @MyFundedFutures account. But we had already sent our active winner list to MFFU and his email was NEVER on that list. If we had really promised him an account through MFFU, wouldn’t his email have been submitted? So how could MFFU suddenly claim “breach of policy” over something that never even existed? That’s the part we still don’t understand. What hurts even more is this: We’ve worked with MFFU for years. Strong partnership. Top-selling almost every week. Built on trust and consistency. But when this happened, there wasn’t even one call. Thats so unprofessional.
English
20
12
30
2.1K
TheTrustedProp
TheTrustedProp@TheTrustedProp·
Are you following us with your notifications turned on? Amazing prizes are coming in for our active followers!💙
English
8
4
18
541
TheTrustedProp
TheTrustedProp@TheTrustedProp·
Congratulations to the winners of our 2-Step $5K Blue Guardian challenge accounts are: azh*********ial@gmail.com * rus**********006@gmail.com * jea***********iro@gmail.com * ric**********lls@gmail.com * tra*******rj9@gmail.com * ari********124@gmail.com * ngu*********s49@gmail.com * uh5****985@gmail.com * bal***********l20@gmail.com * phu*********ats@gmail.com * sum*********449@gmail.com * azi************r90@gmail.com * quo***********679@gmail.com * ank*********al5@gmail.com * mah***********k66@gmail.com * man***********943@gmail.com * shi***********190@gmail.com * roh*********123@gmail.com * roy****289@gmail.com * dil*******k01@gmail.com * dar**********nya@gmail.com * pro**********ded@gmail.com * tib*********le5@gmail.com * oma****************804@gmail.com * fun*********a70@gmail.com * ume**********393@gmail.com * drg*****540@gmail.com * mou***********a31@gmail.com * fat*************eke@gmail.com * ony*********ike@gmail.com
TheTrustedProp@TheTrustedProp

🎉 GIVEAWAY ANNOUNCEMENT 🎉 30 x $5k🎁🎁 We’re excited to launch a new community giveaway on TheTrustedProp Forum! 🚀 🎯 How to Participate: 1️⃣ Sign up on the TTP website Create your account to get started. 2️⃣ Visit TheTrustedProp Forum Head over to the forum section on the platform. 3️⃣ Answer at least 5 questions Your answers must be: ✔ Helpful ✔ Detailed ✔ Genuine ⚠️ No spam, AI-generated low-quality replies, or copy-paste content will be accepted. The more value you provide to the community, the better your chances of winning! 🏆 Start participating now and become an active part of TheTrustedProp community

English
8
8
42
4K
Utkarsh
Utkarsh@Utkarsh32192205·
@TheTrustedProp I would trust only top notch firms and Yeah Futures firms
English
0
0
0
32
TheTrustedProp
TheTrustedProp@TheTrustedProp·
FundingPips aside, which other firm would you trust to pay you if you make 100% profit on your account at a time?
English
57
3
54
3.7K
Utkarsh
Utkarsh@Utkarsh32192205·
@TheTrustedProp My favourite is the futures account , but u guys aren't giving it...
English
0
0
1
24
TheTrustedProp
TheTrustedProp@TheTrustedProp·
Which prop account model is your favorite?
English
16
1
20
942
TheTrustedProp
TheTrustedProp@TheTrustedProp·
The prop firm industry has a monetization problem, and nobody wants to talk about it. Prop firms happily pay Trustpilot. They pay advertising platforms. They pay software companies. They pay agencies. They pay media companies. But when it comes to review websites and information platforms, suddenly the expectation is: “Give us traffic, rankings, credibility, exposure, content, support, and sales… but don’t charge us.” Nobody asks Bloomberg: “How many sales will you generate before we pay?” Nobody asks a newspaper: “How many customers will we get from this article?” Yet review platforms are expected to survive for free. At the same time, parts of the review industry operate on intimidation, pressure, and pay-to-play tactics. Some people threaten firms with exposure and then charge them to stay quiet. Some platforms remove genuine negative reviews after getting paid. Some firms pay simply because they don’t want to become targets. Everyone knows this happens. Very few people say it publicly. The affiliate system is broken too. Some firms track via links. Some via coupons. Some require coupon + signup. Some require coupon + first purchase. Some require link + coupon. Some have completely different tracking systems for different affiliates. Then firms compare numbers between affiliates as if everyone is being measured the same way. They’re not. And even when attribution works, the economics make little sense. A review website spends years building trust with traders. A trader discovers a prop firm through that website. The trader buys once. The affiliate gets paid once. The trader then continues spending money with that firm for months or years. The platform that introduced the customer receives nothing. Meanwhile, forex brokers can pay partners for years because they understand customer lifetime value. If a platform with thousands of research-driven visitors every day struggles to monetize fairly, the problem isn’t the traffic. The problem is the business model. TheTrustedProp has thousands of traders visiting every day to research firms before spending money. Most people would assume those numbers automatically translate into huge revenue. They don’t. Because the economics of the industry are broken. The funny part? The same firms that don’t want independent review platforms to earn money today will be the first ones complaining tomorrow when only a handful of websites control all visibility in the industry. Do prop firms really want that monopoly? Because that’s exactly where we’re heading. If TheTrustedProp disappears one day, some people may celebrate. But it won’t be a win for traders. It won’t be a win for transparency. It won’t be a win for competition. It will simply mean that another independent platform couldn’t survive in an industry that says it wants transparency, but refuses to support the businesses providing it. We genuinely tried. The question is: Does the industry actually want independent platforms to survive? Please share your thoughts. Honest question to everyone, especially ones running review sites. Keep ego, hates everything aside and share your POV. Criticism accepted.
English
35
22
105
3.9K
Utkarsh
Utkarsh@Utkarsh32192205·
Do you think consistency matters more than high RR in prop firm trading? Check out my post: "Do you think consistency matters more than high RR in propfirms ?" thetrustedprop.com/forum/general/…
English
0
0
0
8
Utkarsh รีทวีตแล้ว
Prop Firms Plaza
Prop Firms Plaza@propfirmsplaza·
"Futures Prop Showdown" 5 × $50k Futures Eval Giveaway 🎁 Vote for your favourite futures firm below! Like, repost & comment the reason ✓
English
465
391
506
11.1K