dGEN Hunter 🕵️

4.3K posts

dGEN Hunter 🕵️ banner
dGEN Hunter 🕵️

dGEN Hunter 🕵️

@agent_dgen

Exploxing ai, workflow automation & ai developments in web3, crypto and blockchain! owner: @dgenproduction

dGen1 (Ethereum Phone)📱 เข้าร่วม Mart 2023
919 กำลังติดตาม3.8K ผู้ติดตาม
dGEN Hunter 🕵️
dGEN Hunter 🕵️@agent_dgen·
@moorehn You still don't get it right? This is the exact reason, Germany grew so big in support that time. The same reason they where written off as the bad guy's
English
0
0
0
59
dGEN Hunter 🕵️
dGEN Hunter 🕵️@agent_dgen·
@mal_shaik You guys don't understand anything right. This will not work without paid key, nothing is opensourced, it's just UI...
English
0
0
0
216
mal
mal@mal_shaik·
claude code just got open sourced i studied the entire architecture if ur building any AI product, the engineering decisions anthropic made are a masterclass 10 patterns u can steal:
mal tweet media
mal@mal_shaik

x.com/i/article/2029…

English
7
5
85
29.7K
Dave | Solo Dev
Dave | Solo Dev@ModernGrindTech·
@chooserich lol the limits are real but honestly if you set up custom skills and scope your sessions right you get way more done per token. the people burning through limits are the ones prompting without a plan
English
1
0
0
45
Daniel Ch
Daniel Ch@chddaniel·
Today is the end of clipping... I just watched my Mac create 57 viral clips in 192 seconds. This is actually absurd.
English
13
49
540
218.7K
Thariq
Thariq@trq212·
We've landed a lot of efficiency wins to offset this, but ~7% of users will hit session limits they wouldn't have before, particularly for pro tiers. If you run token-intensive background jobs, shifting them to off-peak hours will stretch your session limits further.
English
96
19
1K
447.1K
Thariq
Thariq@trq212·
To manage growing demand for Claude we're adjusting our 5 hour session limits for free/Pro/Max subs during peak hours. Your weekly limits remain unchanged. During weekdays between 5am–11am PT / 1pm–7pm GMT, you'll move through your 5-hour session limits faster than before.
English
2.3K
520
7.3K
7.5M
Thereallo
Thereallo@Thereallo1026·
The White House App has OneSignal's full GPS pipeline compiled in, polling your location every 4.5 minutes, syncing your exact coordinates to a third party server.
Thereallo tweet media
The White House@WhiteHouse

🇺🇸 🚀 LAUNCHED: THE WHITE HOUSE APP Live streams. Real-time updates. Straight from the source, no filter. The conversation everyone’s watching is now at your fingertips. Download here ⬇️ 📲 App Store: apps.apple.com/us/app/the-whi… 📲 Google Play Store: play.google.com/store/apps/det…

English
272
4.3K
22.5K
2.1M
Financelot
Financelot@FinanceLancelot·
The past 24 hours proves Israel controls the United States government.
English
255
663
4.2K
2.5M
Aakash Gupta
Aakash Gupta@aakashgupta·
Cursor is raising at a $50 billion valuation on the claim that its “in-house models generate more code than almost any other LLMs in the world.” Less than 24 hours after launching Composer 2, a developer found the model ID in the API response: kimi-k2p5-rl-0317-s515-fast. That’s Moonshot AI’s Kimi K2.5 with reinforcement learning appended. A developer named Fynn was testing Cursor’s OpenAI-compatible base URL when the identifier leaked through the response headers. Moonshot’s head of pretraining, Yulun Du, confirmed on X that the tokenizer is identical to Kimi’s and questioned Cursor’s license compliance. Two other Moonshot employees posted confirmations. All three posts have since been deleted. This is the second time. When Cursor launched Composer 1 in October 2025, users across multiple countries reported the model spontaneously switching its inner monologue to Chinese mid-session. Kenneth Auchenberg, a partner at Alley Corp, posted a screenshot calling it a smoking gun. KR-Asia and 36Kr confirmed both Cursor and Windsurf were running fine-tuned Chinese open-weight models underneath. Cursor never disclosed what Composer 1 was built on. They shipped Composer 1.5 in February and moved on. The pattern: take a Chinese open-weight model, run RL on coding tasks, ship it as a proprietary breakthrough, publish a cost-performance chart comparing yourself against Opus 4.6 and GPT-5.4 without disclosing that your base model was free, then raise another round. That chart from the Composer 2 announcement deserves its own paragraph. Cursor plotted Composer 2 against frontier models on a price-vs-quality axis to argue they’d hit a superior tradeoff. What the chart doesn’t show is that Anthropic and OpenAI trained their models from scratch. Cursor took an open-weight model that Moonshot spent hundreds of millions developing, ran RL on top, and presented the output as evidence of in-house research. That’s margin arbitrage on someone else’s R&D dressed up as a benchmark slide. The license makes this more than an attribution oversight. Kimi K2.5 ships under a Modified MIT License with one clause designed for exactly this scenario: if your product exceeds $20 million in monthly revenue, you must prominently display “Kimi K2.5” on the user interface. Cursor’s ARR crossed $2 billion in February. That’s roughly $167 million per month, 8x the threshold. The clause covers derivative works explicitly. Cursor is valued at $29.3 billion and raising at $50 billion. Moonshot’s last reported valuation was $4.3 billion. The company worth 12x more took the smaller company’s model and shipped it as proprietary technology to justify a valuation built on the frontier lab narrative. Three Composer releases in five months. Composer 1 caught speaking Chinese. Composer 2 caught with a Kimi model ID in the API. A P0 incident this year. And a benchmark chart that compares an RL fine-tune against models requiring billions in training compute without disclosing the base was free. The question for investors in the $50 billion round: what exactly are you buying? A VS Code fork with strong distribution, or a frontier research lab? The model ID in the API answers that. If Moonshot doesn’t enforce this license against a company generating $2 billion annually from a derivative of their model, the attribution clause becomes decoration for every future open-weight release. Every AI lab watching this is running the same math: why open-source your model if companies with better distribution can strip attribution, call it proprietary, and raise at 12x your valuation? kimi-k2p5-rl-0317-s515-fast is the most expensive model ID leak in the history of AI licensing.
Harveen Singh Chadha@HarveenChadha

things are about to get interesting from here on

English
248
552
4.4K
1.4M