arusher

69.6K posts

arusher

arusher

@arusher

เข้าร่วม Temmuz 2008
254 กำลังติดตาม410 ผู้ติดตาม
arusher รีทวีตแล้ว
shoe
shoe@shoe0nhead·
@LibertyLockPod UNPLUG THE TVS IN YOUR PARENTS HOUSE RIGHT NOW
English
87
329
7.6K
82.1K
arusher รีทวีตแล้ว
Clint Russell
Clint Russell@LibertyLockPod·
This is what Trump told us to watch tonight. Micro Levin explaining that we need boots on the ground to go grab uranium in Iran. The president. Told us to watch Mark Levin. To prepare us for boots on the ground in the Middle East. AGAIN. We live in hell.
Chris Menahan 🇺🇸@infolibnews

Mark Levin makes the case for putting troops on the ground in Iran: "Why would we need troops on the ground? …We've got to get the uranium… [Iran] can make dirty bombs… You need to get to the uranium." (Trump urged his followers to watch this show hours ago on Truth Social.)

English
464
1.6K
11.5K
365.1K
arusher รีทวีตแล้ว
TheRealThelmaJohnson
TheRealThelmaJohnson@TheRealThelmaJ1·
Turning Point USA is trying to take over our utilities in Arizona. Here they are ballot harvesting for the Salt River Project election. Ballot Harvesting is illegal in Arizona but because this is a private election they can do it.
kenny jacobs🌻@kennyjacobs

I have questions.

English
39
305
694
22.4K
arusher รีทวีตแล้ว
Tyler Rogoway
Tyler Rogoway@Aviation_Intel·
This guy doesn't think Iran is smart enough to prioritize targeting an AWACS. Very high value, low density asset and very easy to spot. Also a key asset that enables defense against their one-way attack munitions, in particular. It would be the top target on that installation.
Shahryar Pasandideh@shahpas

🇮🇷🇸🇦🇺🇸 I'll buy the argument that Iran's targeting of AN/TPY-2 radars early in the war was part of a concerted campaign intended to neutralize high-end BMD sensors, but I think it is a stretch to characterize the reported damage to a USAF E-3 AEW&C aircraft as Iran undertaking something to the effect of an "asymmetric counter-air campaign." It was likely a target of opportunity, with IRGC planners being perfectly content if a KC-135, or even a "mere" chartered 737 or 767 that delivered military personnel and/or equipment, was damaged, if not destroyed, instead of an E-3. Granted, I can see how and why someone taking an unmistakably American perspective/POV might view this incident as evidence of a concerted Iranian "counter-air campaign," but I think this is the result of mirror imaging and hindsight. These strikes are not new. There have been reported Iranian strikes against al-Kharj/Prince Sultan airbase in Saudi Arabia for some time now. Why were the "usual suspects" not talking about a concerted Iranian "counter-air campaign" before reports/satellite imagery emerged of damage to aircraft on the sprawling apron at this Saudi airbase near Riyadh (and after we had reports of attacks against al-Kharj/Prince Sultan)?

English
40
59
910
73.1K
arusher รีทวีตแล้ว
arusher รีทวีตแล้ว
JV13
JV13@JV13tt·
@TheIntelFrog Preview of a Chinese satellite imagery
JV13 tweet media
English
1
6
53
8K
arusher รีทวีตแล้ว
TheIntelFrog
TheIntelFrog@TheIntelFrog·
Photos have surfaced showing extensive damage to US Air Force E-3 Sentry #AE11EA 81-0005 following the drone and missile attack at Prince Sultan Air Base yesterday that also damaged several KC-135s.
TheIntelFrog tweet mediaTheIntelFrog tweet mediaTheIntelFrog tweet media
Chris Gordon@ByChrisGordon

A pivotal U.S. Air Force E-3 Sentry AWACS command and control plane was among the aircraft damaged Iranian missile and drone attack on Prince Sultan Air Base yesterday. Here’s why it matters: airandspaceforces.com/key-e-3-awacs-… Featuring thoughts from @ka_grieco and @MitchellStudies w/ @StephenLosey

English
200
994
3.8K
1.4M
arusher รีทวีตแล้ว
OSINTtechnical
OSINTtechnical@Osinttechnical·
New image reportedly showing the USAF E-3 Sentry destroyed in an Iranian attack at Prince Sultan Airbase on Friday. Matches 81-0005, an E-3C seen deployed to the base in recent weeks.
OSINTtechnical tweet media
English
532
2.9K
14.1K
3.6M
arusher รีทวีตแล้ว
Rockin' The 904 Like A Boss
Rockin' The 904 Like A Boss@Florida904Boss·
@MikeLevin I don't think our founders would have wanted a SINGLE person in Congress being able to kill legislation. All the rules allowing such things should be removed.
English
7
26
548
17.6K
arusher รีทวีตแล้ว
Mike Levin
Mike Levin@MikeLevin·
I’ve been in Congress through divided governments, bitter fights, and historic crises. I’ve never seen anything like the last 24 hours. Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson killed Republican Senate Majority Leader John Thune’s bipartisan deal to fund the TSA, Coast Guard, and FEMA.  It was a deal that had the support of Senate Republicans and Democrats alike, 100-0! Why? Because Johnson places his own political survival and fealty to Trump over all else, including long waits at airports or anything else. We could have passed it in the House easily if only Johnson had allowed the vote to proceed. But instead he blew up the whole thing. Where this goes next is anyone’s guess, but what’s very clear is that Johnson is the worst and most subservient speaker in modern American history.
English
1.6K
6K
19.9K
497.6K
arusher รีทวีตแล้ว
Ro Khanna
Ro Khanna@RoKhanna·
A new moral direction is opposing the fuel embargo that is causing blackouts & hunger in Cuba. Saying the truth about the genocide in Gaza. Not sending military weapons to kill civilians to Israel. Opposing Iran war. Americans are deeply good & want us to be for human rights.
AIPAC 🇺🇸🇮🇱@AIPAC

A moral direction like you, @RoKhanna, embracing someone who says America deserved 9/11 and compares Zionists to neo-Nazis?

English
400
1.7K
10.9K
447.8K
arusher รีทวีตแล้ว
Peter Twinklage
Peter Twinklage@PeterTwinklage·
to the closet case comms staffer who tweeted this: you will never enjoy a fulfilling career, you will never experience love, and you will never be respected by anyone other than people who are the reason bottles of Windex have warning labels
GOP@GOP

No Queens

English
65
154
3.5K
114K
arusher รีทวีตแล้ว
Christopher David
Christopher David@Tazerface16·
Worked in semiconductors for many years. Usage of helium for making computer chips is ubiquitous and required. We just blew up 30% of the world supply. No helium means no AI chips. No AI chips means no AI data centers. No data centers means no AI bubble. =Market crash.
English
657
3.4K
17.3K
610.8K
arusher รีทวีตแล้ว
Aaron Parnas
Aaron Parnas@AaronParnas·
NEW: Organizers have confirmed to me that more than 8 million people attended today’s no Kings Day protest—one of the largest ever.
English
1.9K
1.2K
7.6K
347.4K
arusher รีทวีตแล้ว
bonky
bonky@shesbonky·
Tomi doesn't seem to understamd that the badass women who protested the Vietnam war at age 17 are now protesting another useless war at age 68 These same women marched so Tomi can wear pants to her job at FuxNews and put her paycheck into her own bank account
bonky tweet media
English
951
4.3K
19.7K
241.6K
arusher รีทวีตแล้ว
derek guy
derek guy@dieworkwear·
it's hard for me to identify masculine virtues that i don't think are just general virtues, such as courage, integrity, and temperance. manosphere virtues seem to revolve around physical strength, money, and sex. these are rooted in narcissism, which is not a virtue
Rory Sutherland@rorysutherland

All manosphere influencers seem to think they have worked out masculinity from first principles, free of social norms. But if you transplanted them to the last century, people would have assumed they were bizarrely vain. You didn't see DI Burnside on The Bill going to a gym unless it was to arrest the proprietor.

English
77
467
5.4K
219.6K