Sasha Nazarov

Does anybody have AX 2012 or AX 2009? I wonder how old this bug is. #D365FO

@nocapmedia "Don't show off on a motorcycle. When you ride a motorcycle, you're already showing off" (c)

Only can blame himself

Fix build error at "using Microsoft.IdentityModel.Clients.ActiveDirectory" in D365FO update 10.0.43 sashanazarov.blogspot.com/2025/03/fix-bu…

@true_gtrst @Roniakia

Гигабаза, хоть и не нравится он мне.

🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

How to tell there are no cats in the house, without telling there are no cats in the house.

@wojzeh @TruninDenis Tier 1

@atomset @TruninDenis How did you measure this time? Is it in prod tier?

Don't try this at home: bypassing "next" in CoC (D365FO) sashanazarov.blogspot.com/2022/12/d365fo…

@FrankHuether @TruninDenis My only hope is some MS guy will read my post. It happened before.

@TruninDenis I did not report it. They will ask if this issue affects Go-Live and stuff like that, and after I will have answered all the questions, they will give it priority 3 and archive the case, and then I will be asked to provide feedback on how good they were at archiving the case.

@atomset The original issue looks not good, Microsoft invests a lot in perf optimization(like new ledger microservices), but if a simple class creation takes 2 seconds, something fundamental is broken. Have you reported this to MS support?

@PalleAgermark 5 words in the product name were not enough. 30 words would result in word wrapping -> extra line above the URL entry field -> profit

@PalleAgermark I have mixed feelings about all those limitations by default. So far “internal” and “private” keywords were pain in the butt on real customer projects. Looking forward to see “[Hookable(false), Wrappable(false)] internal private SalesTable find(…)” one day

@PalleAgermark Sure :)

@PalleAgermark OK, so now one can write a script, that will open a dialog with a field for a T-SQL statement, run the statement, then set its own status back and be ready for a new T-SQL. Sound flexible enough.

@FrankHuether @dodiggitydag Om-nom-nom, new enforcements!

Me writing unit tests with ATL

@PalleAgermark They must have realized, that SalesOrderLineV2Entity got a non-hookable postTargetProcess method in PU21

It looks like submitting a General idea is pure waste of time.

Why it is important to take a break at work twitter.com/nigelj08223325…

@FrankHuether Thanks, all in all it looks like there is no way to exclude a test with an attribute. Instead, every other test class must be decorated with some attribute, which may be used as a filter then.

Is there a way to setup test filter criteria in build pipelines, so unit test methods decorated with a certain attribute get excluded?