Bloc𐤊DAG 🐋 2010

🔴 LIVE 24/7 right now! $kas #kaspa 👇 Watch here youtube.com/live/9cU5-n4ad…

@hashdag @Grayscale @realvijayk Kimochi gozaimasen

@Grayscale @realvijayk arigato gozaimasu! if Kaspa army showed up here, think how they'll show up when you provide a KAS digital asset.. by mid june Kaspa OP_CAT++ Bitcoin. worth the attention _/\_

who should we be following in crypto right now? we'll follow the most mentioned accounts ⬇️

@LeadersJunction Yes, that’s right and in the end, you died young, Bruce.

Why you should never speak negatively about yourself

@theamelia__ Super OK

@kunoo only $kas

ETH is dead BTC is too slow SOL is filled with scammers XRP is for old people What’s the solution?

@HuobiGlobal @kaspaunchained @Kaspa_KEF

HTX公告将上线 $KAS (Kaspa) @kaspaunchained @Kaspa_KEF 📌 Kaspa 是一种去中心化的和完全可扩展的 Layer-1，基于 GHOSTDAG 协议。 ✅ 充币业务已开启 ⏰ 币币交易12月24日 17:00 (UTC+8) ⏰ 提币业务12月25日 17:00 (UTC+8)

@thekaspaonion Me too

I must come clean to y'all.... I have sold 100% of my kaspa Not because of price But because Kaspa has a roadmap I want my money to be In a protocol with no road map.... And no ability to pivot, especially with quantum computing concerns later down the line Ossification is a feature, not a bug

Crypto isn’t dying suddenly. It’s rotting slowly. Too many parasites, zero innovation. Just leverage, memes, and fake narratives recycled every cycle. This market no longer builds the future — it farms idiots as exit liquidity.

@DesheShai 🥱

@blockdagen 🤦

I'm glad to see that, following the last few days of discussion, $kas core leads decided to pivot to a more collaborative, less isolationist approach. Kaspa needs innovators working with the facilities already/nearly available. Builders prepared to be the premium clients of upcoming innovations. Expediting covenants and ZK_OPCODES to allow canonical bridging (and some other stuff) is a great decision that should benefit all sides to this discussion. The previous unreasonable hard line core leads took against building over their own chain has caused a lot of tension to accumulate between core and eco. Hopefully, this tension will start to relieve soon. (And for those upset with me for "fudding", remember that without an open, stubborn discussion, nothing would have changed. I feel that I represent a perspective that the core leads tend to miss/ignore, so I will keep volunteering it for the betterment of Kaspa. Making noise is my only means to raise important questions that everybody else seems to miss, and I'm not giving that resource away to make nice with anyone. I'm not here to make friends. I already have friends. I'm here to help Kaspa. No other reason to even keep this cursed acc. This is not the first or second time this worked, and you can't be assured that it won't be the last time either.)

@DesheShai I hope this is a truly based rollup — not a token-generating sidechain. A real based rollup doesn’t need a new token. It settles on Kaspa L1 and uses KAS.

@blockdagen Go learn what "based rollups" means

@DesheShai Thanks

@blockdagen It's amazing to me that you *clearly* haven't read a single word of the discussion you are commentating on.

@Wisdom_HQ From a + b = 80 and a − b = 80, add both equations: 2a = 160, so a = 80. Substitute back: b = 0. Therefore ab = 80 × 0 = 0. The trick is realizing both equations force b to be zero.

$btc #Bitcoin

@DesheShai @cryptok777 Long lectures about community funding don’t replace action. The price was clear: $150k. If that’s unreasonable, build something better. If not, it’s just commentary from the sidelines.

The replies here are depressing. Not the initiative by Wolfie, which is very nice of him, but the comments mocking @cryptok777 for asking for some compensation after running the website for the Kaspa community out of his own pocket for three years. This is far from being the first instance of a contributing community member ostracized for trying to earn compensation for their work. I'm sure @asaefstroem will do a fantastic job, as I've heard he has done for Sparkle/vProgs. The point here is not to undermine him or his undertaking. The point is that a project whose community disparages community funding cannot call itself a "community project". Even if developers can grow from the community, once they need resources that go beyond uplifting tweets, their only recourse is either secure funding from a very small group of individuals, work indefinitely out of their own pocket (even if their undertaking has no immediate profit horizon, e.g. a block explorer, or a book), or wither. History shows that turning to the community for funding hasn't been an option for more than a year now. Not only is the community reluctant to support, but it is actively hostile against such attempts. (Simple yet annoying example: some people "called me out" for receiving 1Mkas from the Rust fund so I "shouldn't be complaining". But the truth is that I contributed 1.5Mkas to that same fund during the crowdfunding phase. I got less back than I put in. I don't care, I didn't put in that Kas to make a direct profit, I did it to contribute to the development. But this is still somehow used against me when I mention that my decision to dedicate so much time and effort to Kaspa resulted in an overall *huge* net loss for me personally.) Kaspa has a community and Kaspa has a project. But that is not enough to call it a "community project". As long as the community doesn't help carry the project, they cannot take credit for the project. Every time you call it a "community project" you just hoard credit from people who worked hard with no meaningful support from that same community. This isn't even a criticism, just am observation. And it should be trivial for anyone following the plot. The Kaspa community offers zero support for devs who want to take risks, which means "the community" has failed it's end in the social contract called a "community project". This doesn't mean Kaspa is doomed, or that it has failed as a project. It just means it's time to grow up of this narrative and face the reality of the situation: the Kaspa community delegated the task of taking care of contributors to a narrow selection of wealthy individuals, and developed a social norm where asking the community for funding (or even appreciation) is considered distasteful and should be avoided. In that, the community relinquished any rights to claim that they are supporting the project. It is as simple as that. The good news is that this fate is not set in stone. You want Kaspa to be a community project? Put your money where your mouth is. Like I did, like cryptok did, like many others did (and got fuckall in return). There are a million things you can do. For example, set up a community funded grants program. If it is really a "community project", such a fund should be formidable enough to support a lot of currently starving ecosystem endeavors. You want to be a "social movement"? Then fucking move. You don't feel it's your responsibility? That's fine. It's your prerogative to do whatever you want with your resources, even if you made them by being an early Kaspa contributor. But then you don't get to call Kaspa a "community project".

What do you think ? $kas #kaspa

@lunarfq 👌

be honest, is this relationship okay?

“The crypto market is rotting from manipulation and hidden agendas. Exit early, or pay the price.”

All Crypto is death

@brt2412 Idc 🥳

Yonatan publicly offered to fund kas.fyi and the community tagged the owner a million times pointing this out and he still shuts it down? Thats suspicious as fuck man. What is actually going on here?

$KAS is going to death. Every time it tries to go up, it’s instantly forced down, then pushed lower and lower. No real price discovery, just constant suppression. Feels like endless distribution until retail gives up completely. #kaspa