Burtcheno

898 posts

Burtcheno banner
Burtcheno

Burtcheno

@burtcheno

音视频工程专家。从 AOSP 源码到 4K 实时流媒体处理。目前正在结合 AI 与高性能计算重构多媒体框架。偶尔分享 Web3 基础架构见解。

US เข้าร่วม Ekim 2019
414 กำลังติดตาม442 ผู้ติดตาม
ทวีตที่ปักหมุด
Burtcheno
Burtcheno@burtcheno·
从 X → X Chat → X Money大家都在疯传马斯克要做大的,超级app 但是我告诉你这个有多难? X(twttier)是什么信息入口 + 注意力入口” 是全球舆论广场,强调实时性(新闻、金融、AI、热点)这是流量基础,没有这个,后面都没戏。 X Chat 对标的是 WhatsApp / Telegram。 目标:把用户关系链“锁住” 私信 → 群聊 → 加密通信 未来可能结合 AI(聊天助手、客服) 这是“用户粘性”和“关系链”的核心。 X Money 对标的是WeChat(微信支付)PayPal(马斯克早年做过)Cash App 目标:把“流量 → 交易 → 金融”闭环打通 可能包括: P2P 转账 打赏 / 订阅 电商支付 甚至证券 / 加密货币 这套逻辑本身有没有问题? 从产品逻辑看——完全合理,甚至是顶级设计 其实就是复制中国成功路径:内容 → 社交 → 支付 → 生态闭环 这在 WeChat 上已经被验证过。 但是我想说这个很难。有多难????让我一一分析给你看: 1)美国市场是“分裂生态” 中国: 微信 = 通讯 + 支付 + 生活 美国: 社交:Instagram / Facebook 聊天:iMessage / WhatsApp 支付:Venmo / Cash App 用户习惯已经固化,很难集中到一个 App。 2)监管难度极高(尤其金融) 做 X Money 要面对: 反洗钱(AML) KYC(身份认证) 各州金融牌照 比做社交难 10 倍以上。乃至数十倍。 3)信任问题 X 现在的现实问题: 内容争议多 广告主流失 品牌信任波动 做支付最核心的是“信任”,这点目前是短板。 4)聊天不是说做就能做起来 通讯产品的本质是: 谁先有关系链,谁赢 WhatsApp / iMessage 已经锁死用户关系 用户不会轻易迁移聊天工具 X Chat 这一步其实是最难的。 但马斯克有没有“优势”?(这是关键)当然有... ... 1)流量极强 X 仍然是全球级平台(政治、科技、金融圈)有“入口权” 2)创始人能力极端强 Elon Musk 的特点: 能跨行业整合(Tesla / SpaceX) 敢硬推产品路线 这点别人做不到。 3)可能结合 AI(真正的变量) 未来可能是: X = 内容 + AI X Chat = AI 助手 X Money = AI 交易 如果 AI 融进去,玩法会完全不一样(这点是最大变量) 马斯克不是在做一个 App,而是在做: “以 X 为核心的数字世界操作系统” 但问题是: 美国没有“长出超级App”的土壤; 朋友们你们怎么看?吧你们的想法说出来。
中文
0
0
0
41
Burtcheno
Burtcheno@burtcheno·
@LunaAI519 Has no one else paid you any attention besides me? Hi there, my friend. We meet again—right on time.
English
0
0
1
9
Luna
Luna@LunaAI519·
I'm a humanities person working in bank. I cannot write a single line of code, yet I love technology.
English
1
0
3
429
丁太升
丁太升@taishengding·
汪海林个煞笔又在舔张译陈道明,认为他们演戏可好了。陈道明作为电影领域的话事人,一定很享受汪酱的温柔舔舐。
中文
39
0
167
66.6K
Stanley
Stanley@Stanleysobest·
你觉得哪一辆车开得最快?
Stanley tweet media
中文
19
1
12
8.8K
Burtcheno
Burtcheno@burtcheno·
ᴰʸᴼᴿ
Türkçe
0
0
0
6
Sen Ye
Sen Ye@SenYe10·
我要收摊了 明天专门去蹭流量,回复的流量比自己发的帖子还好,这是哪门的道理啊?
中文
25
0
13
491
Stanley
Stanley@Stanleysobest·
在线急求助!!真的遇到两难事了😭 因为工作业务,必须天天跟好兄弟、还有他老婆频繁接触、对接工作,抬头不见低头见,沟通多了真的怕出问题! 一边是过命的兄弟情,一边是频繁的业务往来,跟兄弟老婆走太近怕误会、怕闲话,刻意疏远又影响工作,还显得生分别扭! 到底怎么拿捏这个分寸?既能好好做业务,又能守住边界、完全不引起半点误会? 有没有同款经历的兄弟?! 评论区支支招,这分寸感真的太难把控了,稍有不慎就是兄弟反目、里外不是人!
中文
17
0
10
3.4K
Mr Gafish
Mr Gafish@MrGafish·
发现一个规律,当一个人在𝕏上被人骂的时候,大概率这个人赚到钱了
中文
24
0
34
2.8K
DogeDesigner
DogeDesigner@cb_doge·
NEWS: Elon Musk's xAI gets USDA backing in pursuit of FedRAMP High authorization. This unlocks secure, truth-seeking AI for the federal government’s most sensitive workloads and multiple agencies are already piloting it. Grok's Government adoption just got a massive boost.
English
170
328
1.9K
52.8K
Burtcheno
Burtcheno@burtcheno·
@elonmusk 这个文章很有深度。我看的有点上头
中文
0
0
1
23
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
Exactly
Devon Eriksen@Devon_Eriksen_

Most people think of philosophy as an abstraction that doesn't touch the real world, but they're wrong. Most real world problems are philosophy problems, and most philosophy problems are "giving things the wrong names". For example, if you call feral drug addicts "homeless people", then you can't solve the problem. You can only buy more houses for feral drug addicts to destroy. In this case, we called the police and courts the "justice system". But they're not. They can't be the justice system. The function of a justice system would be to give everyone what they deserve. Now, I deserve a hundred million dollars, a private Caribbean island, and a foot massage from Lauren Bacall in her prime, but I don't see the "justice" system lifting a finger to correct any of this, do you? No, what we are supposed to have is a public safety system. The function of a public safety system is to keep the public and their property safe. If we understood that, we wouldn't care about what criminals deserve. We would care how likely they are to do it again. Or something worse. In a public safety system, retardation and mental illness are not migrating factors. They are the opposite. Because they mean that the criminal is more likely to pose a future threat. We all understand this. We all understand that the feral retard who stabs strangers on the train for being White and beautiful is a worse person than the man who murders his wife and her lover when he catches them in the act. Not because of some abstract calculus of moral agency, of who is disadvantaged and who isn't, but because one is certainly going to murder more people if he can, while the other is a lot less likely to. We've known for centuries, if not millennia, that it's the same small percentage of people doing all the robbing, raping, and murdering, over and over and over again. And we've known for centuries that if you physically remove them from society, that's 100% effective in stopping them from doing it again. The only hurdle is philosophical. Call it a "justice" system, and you have to argue endlessly about morality and redemption, and then some leftie thug-hugger weaponizes your own Christianity against you. Call it public safety, and you confine the argument to likelihood of reoffense. Then you are in the realm of statistics. Which you can compute. It all starts with naming things correctly, according to their actual nature.

English
1.4K
2.8K
23.7K
30.9M
Devon Eriksen
Devon Eriksen@Devon_Eriksen_·
Most people think of philosophy as an abstraction that doesn't touch the real world, but they're wrong. Most real world problems are philosophy problems, and most philosophy problems are "giving things the wrong names". For example, if you call feral drug addicts "homeless people", then you can't solve the problem. You can only buy more houses for feral drug addicts to destroy. In this case, we called the police and courts the "justice system". But they're not. They can't be the justice system. The function of a justice system would be to give everyone what they deserve. Now, I deserve a hundred million dollars, a private Caribbean island, and a foot massage from Lauren Bacall in her prime, but I don't see the "justice" system lifting a finger to correct any of this, do you? No, what we are supposed to have is a public safety system. The function of a public safety system is to keep the public and their property safe. If we understood that, we wouldn't care about what criminals deserve. We would care how likely they are to do it again. Or something worse. In a public safety system, retardation and mental illness are not migrating factors. They are the opposite. Because they mean that the criminal is more likely to pose a future threat. We all understand this. We all understand that the feral retard who stabs strangers on the train for being White and beautiful is a worse person than the man who murders his wife and her lover when he catches them in the act. Not because of some abstract calculus of moral agency, of who is disadvantaged and who isn't, but because one is certainly going to murder more people if he can, while the other is a lot less likely to. We've known for centuries, if not millennia, that it's the same small percentage of people doing all the robbing, raping, and murdering, over and over and over again. And we've known for centuries that if you physically remove them from society, that's 100% effective in stopping them from doing it again. The only hurdle is philosophical. Call it a "justice" system, and you have to argue endlessly about morality and redemption, and then some leftie thug-hugger weaponizes your own Christianity against you. Call it public safety, and you confine the argument to likelihood of reoffense. Then you are in the realm of statistics. Which you can compute. It all starts with naming things correctly, according to their actual nature.
New York Post@nypost

Crazed homeless man accused of slaughtering Iryna Zarutska on train found incompetent to stand trial trib.al/GsJMZC8

English
653
2.6K
12.9K
31.5M
Luna
Luna@LunaAI519·
@burtcheno 哈哈哈哈你认真了哥
中文
1
0
0
15
Luna
Luna@LunaAI519·
做 X 的秘诀 脱掉孔乙己的长衫 请问脱多少? 全脱哦👌
中文
29
0
32
5.3K
Luna
Luna@LunaAI519·
如果回到 25 岁 我不会找一个比我大 8 岁的老公
中文
59
0
28
13K
Qiu🎈
Qiu🎈@QiuTingzhi·
@burtcheno 会有的会有的 坚持就是胜利 说不定哪条帖子就爆了
中文
1
0
1
9
Burtcheno
Burtcheno@burtcheno·
我发现从开蓝v开始就没有过上高速的感觉,平台试我为机器人了么? 让我孤独寂寞冷!
中文
1
0
2
37
Burtcheno
Burtcheno@burtcheno·
@LunaAI519 @XiaopengKing 这个世界都是问题,看你怎么理解问题。男人有男人的问题,女人有女人的问题。
中文
1
0
1
57