consom888

37.6K posts

consom888 banner
consom888

consom888

@consom888

Fortune Favors the Brave

เข้าร่วม Ağustos 2022
1.8K กำลังติดตาม2.3K ผู้ติดตาม
ทวีตที่ปักหมุด
consom888
consom888@consom888·
Esteemed @NickMitsakos on The Genius Act: US Treasury's $15T debt solution using private stablecoins backed by Treasuries. Attracts global buyers, but risks rapid outflows, shadow banking, and challenges for traditional finance. A complex, transformative global money shift. 🧵👇
consom888 tweet mediaconsom888 tweet media
English
7
4
45
22K
Cantonese Cat 🐱🐈
Cantonese Cat 🐱🐈@cantonmeow·
I'm unequivocally passionate about the market. I'm also very expressive, sometimes extremely random, but usually with a point. In 2027, if the world and the market hasn't ended... You're going to hear a lot more from me and on an even more regular basis.
English
11
3
83
4.7K
consom888 รีทวีตแล้ว
Luca
Luca@CrypticTrades_·
Is this a dead-cat bounce or a durable reversal? That’s the question everyone has been asking lately. Price pushes up → sentiment flips bullish Price pulls back → sentiment flips bearish Emotions are moving faster than the market itself. And I think that’s the point. The emotional volatility is the signal What I’m watching right now is not just the price. I’m watching behavior. aggressive longs on green candles panic selling on red candles constant narrative shifts to justify each move This is not stable positioning. This is reactive positioning. And when the market behaves like this, it usually means one thing: → liquidity is being engineered Market makers don’t move the price randomly. They move it where liquidity exists. Right now, liquidity exists on both sides. So the price is being pushed in both directions to: trigger stops force entries create counterparties Why they need the counterparty now I don’t think this is just short-term noise. I think this is positioning for a much larger move. Because if you zoom out, the macro backdrop hasn’t change, it’s actually becoming more extreme. - war-driven inflation pressures - energy acting as a transmission mechanism - weakening consumption - increasing probability of policy intervention This is not a clean environment. This is a transition phase. And in transition phases, large players don’t chase price. They accumulate into uncertainty. But to accumulate size, they need someone to sell to them. That’s the retail side reacting emotionally to volatility. Dead-cat bounce vs durable reversal I think this is the wrong question. Because both can happen within the same structure. Short-term: → this can still be a dead-cat bounce → more downside, more volatility, more liquidity grabs Mid-term: → this can still transition into a durable reversal Why? Because reversals are not events. They are processes. And processes are messy. They involve: fake breakouts failed breakdowns emotional exhaustion The market doesn’t turn when people expect it. It turns when positioning is wrong enough. The macro layer everyone is ignoring Most people are looking at charts in isolation. But the bigger driver is macro. And this is where I think the market is mispricing reality. The current geopolitical situation has already done damage. Even if things de-escalate: energy prices have reset higher supply chains have been disrupted cost structures have changed That doesn’t reverse overnight. It feeds into inflation. At the same time: households are already stretched consumption is slowing growth is weakening That’s your stagflation setup. And in that environment, central banks lose control. The Fed reaction function This is the part I think the market is slowly starting to price in. If growth continues to weaken while inflation stays elevated: → keeping policy tight risks a deeper economic contraction → easing policy risks fueling inflation further But historically, central banks don’t tolerate collapse. They choose liquidity. So the most likely path over time becomes: rate cuts liquidity injections eventual QE Not because they want to, but because they have to. Why this matters for the current price action If that macro path plays out, then what we’re seeing right now is not random. It’s positioning ahead of that shift. And that’s why: downside gets aggressively bought upside gets faded to create more liquidity It’s not clean accumulation. It’s engineered accumulation. The Roaring 20’s transition This ties directly into the thesis I’ve been building. If we move into: aggressive monetary easing persistent inflation technological productivity (AI) Then you get: → a liquidity-driven expansion → strong performance in risk assets → widening wealth inequality That’s your modern version of the Roaring 20’s. But before expansion becomes obvious, the market needs positioning. That’s the phase we’re in, and this is a thesis I've elaborated into my prior article, which you can read here: x.com/CrypticTrades_… What I’m doing I’m not trying to call the exact bottom. I’m focusing on the structure. maintaining exposure to high-conviction assets keeping cash to deploy on volatility hedging when key levels break avoiding emotional reactions to short-term moves Because I don’t think this environment rewards precision. It rewards positioning and risk management. The takeaway If you’re asking whether this is a dead-cat bounce or a reversal, you’re already playing the short-term game. And I think that’s where most people get trapped. The bigger question is: → are you positioned for the regime shift that’s coming? The market is not uncertain. It’s transitioning. And transitions are where most people get shaken out.
English
3
5
36
6.5K
Cantonese Cat 🐱🐈
Cantonese Cat 🐱🐈@cantonmeow·
You want views, followers, and influence right now? You follow the herd and be bearish. There are more bears out there than bulls. And they want to hear what they want to hear.
Cantonese Cat 🐱🐈 tweet media
English
11
1
59
5.3K
Jonathan Goldowsky
Jonathan Goldowsky@jonathan_mg27·
There’s been a lot of recent discussion around ERCOT’s March 17 PGRR 145 comments. The new 830 MW $GLXY project has a requested energization date in 2028, which based on a plain reading of ERCOTs March 17 PGRR 145 comments puts it into section 9.2.1.1(1)(e) with respect to eligibility as base load not subject to restudy in batch zero. That specific section only requires (1) valid completed studies and (2) an attestation from the utility that an IA has been signed. As a reminder, we announced our interconnection study completion on January 15, 2026 and we already executed a service agreement with our utility. PGRR 145 is draft and could change from here, but nothing in it indicates a deferral.
English
16
23
141
6.9K
Cantonese Cat 🐱🐈
Cantonese Cat 🐱🐈@cantonmeow·
They laugh at those who drown Smirk at what has gone down Wanting us all to frown Calling others a clown But “clown” is just a sound It’s a meaningless noun We learn to stick around Achieve our own renown
English
8
0
58
6.3K
Cantonese Cat 🐱🐈
Cantonese Cat 🐱🐈@cantonmeow·
If I picture you naked It’s because I like you And you’re my intrusive thoughts Good night, Carrot Top
English
11
2
37
6.9K
consom888 รีทวีตแล้ว
consom888
consom888@consom888·
Anthropic drops $400M on a 9-person stealth AI biotech team.
If AI compresses years of R&D into months, the TAM behind it expands fast. @rei_labs sits on the infra layer powering that shift with novel cognitive architecture, exiting stealth this quarter.
$REI-volution 👾 ✊🏿
Milk Road AI@MilkRoadAI

Anthropic just paid $400 million for a company that is eight months old. This is a nine person stealth startup that most people had never heard of until yesterday. The startup is called Coefficient Bio, and it was building artificial intelligence to automate the most brutal bottleneck in all of medicine, drug discovery. They are planning which molecules to test, navigating FDA regulatory hell and identifying which diseases even have viable targets. These are the stuff that costs pharmaceutical companies over two billion dollars and more than a decade per drug. A team of nine people was trying to collapse that process with AI, and Anthropic paid nine figures to absorb them entirely. That math works out to roughly $40 million per person. The venture firm that backed them, Dimension, co-founded this company from scratch eight months ago and is now reporting a 38,513% return on their investment. Anthropic is not buying market share, user data, or a viral consumer product, it is buying the intellectual firepower to own the future of drug development. Sanofi is already using Claude, Novo Nordisk is already using Claude, AbbVie and Genmab are already using Claude. The pharmaceutical industry spends hundreds of billions annually on R&D, and it fails at a 90% rate in clinical trials and whoever solves that failure rate with AI owns the most valuable vertical in the world. Anthropic just made its move to be that company. And while all of this is happening, while Anthropic is hiring scientists, acquiring biotech talent, and planting a flag inside the pharmaceutical supply chain, OpenAI spent this same week buying a tech talk show. One company is hunting the future of medicine and the other company is hunting better press coverage.

English
1
1
5
564
Jo 🖥
Jo 🖥@MrJettip·
gm gm Quick look at the @rei_labs trencher this morning. It is on fire $BURNIE up 9.8x since first rating. "Soviet sleeper agent Burnie Sanders parody memecoin gaining traction with dev-run thesis contest and KOL shoutouts."
Jo 🖥 tweet mediaJo 🖥 tweet media
English
7
3
19
437
consom888 รีทวีตแล้ว
Cantonese Cat 🐱🐈
Cantonese Cat 🐱🐈@cantonmeow·
$GLXY weekly, Gann Square We're crying together at support
Cantonese Cat 🐱🐈 tweet media
English
9
3
86
6.9K
consom888 รีทวีตแล้ว
Cantonese Cat 🐱🐈
Cantonese Cat 🐱🐈@cantonmeow·
$BABA weekly 0.618 fib back-tested on exhausting volume
Cantonese Cat 🐱🐈 tweet media
English
9
7
83
8.8K
Cantonese Cat 🐱🐈
Cantonese Cat 🐱🐈@cantonmeow·
$BBAI weekly 0.5 support being tested on exhausting sell volume
Cantonese Cat 🐱🐈 tweet media
English
6
2
24
5.9K