dan9 ⎸ Ultivese⚡️🐑 l 🐉 $MON l 🐟⛓️

7K posts

dan9 ⎸ Ultivese⚡️🐑 l 🐉 $MON l 🐟⛓️ banner
dan9 ⎸ Ultivese⚡️🐑 l 🐉 $MON l 🐟⛓️

dan9 ⎸ Ultivese⚡️🐑 l 🐉 $MON l 🐟⛓️

@crypto_dan9

เข้าร่วม Ağustos 2014
4.2K กำลังติดตาม257 ผู้ติดตาม
dan9 ⎸ Ultivese⚡️🐑 l 🐉 $MON l 🐟⛓️ รีทวีตแล้ว
CryptoD | 1000X GEM
CryptoD | 1000X GEM@CryptoDevinL·
牛回速歸! 大餅再次衝刺十萬! 好久沒抽獎了,就這篇吧 一鍵三連(按讚、留言、轉發) 抽出 3 張 1000X GEM 社區 NFT 明天隨機時間開獎
中文
5.6K
3.6K
4.8K
385.6K
dan9 ⎸ Ultivese⚡️🐑 l 🐉 $MON l 🐟⛓️ รีทวีตแล้ว
Western Lensman
Western Lensman@WesternLensman·
This clip may be the most egregious example of ABC debate moderators' direct actions/inactions to affect viewers’ perceptions of the information presented at the debate. There are at least seven instances of this within a two-minute span. This is not “bias." It’s much worse. This is direct, planned interference in the debate outcome. When moderators take on the role of “fact checkers" the inference is that the absence of a “fact check” confers validity to the non-fact-checked information. When one side is repeatedly “fact checked,” while the other is not, that is a signal to the viewer that one side is not reliable and truthful, while the other side is. The ABC moderators had their orders, and here you see those orders executed. In this clip: 1) Trump says Pelosi is responsible for security at the Capitol. True. Muir intervenes on Kamala’s behalf by cutting him off with snarky retort, doesn’t acknowledging the validity of Trump’s statement, and immediately redirects to Kamala to set up her “answer" he knows is coming. This is direct action by Muir to affect the outcome of this exchange. 2) Kamala says she was at the Capitol on J6. She was there in the morning, but left to go to DNC HQ prior to the riot. Critical information is omitted. No fact-check. 3) Kamala says Trump incited a mob to attack the Capitol. False. Trump’s “peacefully and patriotically” comments are ignored. Trump is not charged with inciting violence. No fact check. 4) Kamala says that “some" police officers died on January 6. False. No fact check. 5) Kamala recites the Charlottesville “Fine People” hoax. This has been thoroughly and repeatedly debunked. No fact check. 6) Kamala recites the “stand back and stand by” hoax. This is designed to infer that Trump was ordering a “militia” to act on later orders, when he was clearly asking for a cooling of tensions. No fact check. 7) Kamala recites the “bloodbath" hoax. Trump was talking about the automobile industry, not violence. No fact check. To quote Megyn Kelly on the ABC moderators: "They did exactly what their bosses wanted."
English
6.7K
31.8K
91.1K
41.4M
路飞
路飞@6_lNFT·
有想进微信群的吗?扣个1
中文
2.4K
6
176
620.4K
Joshua.D
Joshua.D@yiyun_dan1·
聪明钱监控! 开放Telegram群100个名额,欢迎有兴趣的小伙伴参与跟踪。 点击链接加入:t.me/+ozs2CPPfG8c5Y…
中文
44
2
23
12.4K
dan9 ⎸ Ultivese⚡️🐑 l 🐉 $MON l 🐟⛓️ รีทวีตแล้ว
鼹鼠.Chang
鼹鼠.Chang@0xmoles·
很多人在fud $rnt ,例如ansem But:很多degen,很多T1 kol 都在买入 rnt, 有海外caller预言上架币安。 @binance @okx @heyibinance 不能违反民意。 😆 tate 拥有 37万人的频道私域还没有正式推广。 如果推广,这可能是币安和ok必争的拉新用户群体
中文
80
39
64
16.2K
我爱打狗
我爱打狗@smwirth2005·
很多人问我怎么抓到金狗的? 这个帖子回答大家~ 玩土狗呢~之前我是跟kol的单,国内、国外的免费群、付费群都进了不少,今天运气好就赚,明天运气差就亏。总结下来:亏麻了!!! 那我就自己玩嘛,然并卵,我也亏钱呜呜呜!!!难道是我长得丑嘛?不,那肯定是我的方法有问题,所以我做了以下几件事
中文
17
5
19
8.5K
Mysterious
Mysterious@Mysterious9527·
2小时p了14个盘子 每个盘子都是 3个sol或者2个 似乎亏了一两个 不贪的话应该是能赚几个的 太渴望金狗了
中文
4
0
2
3.3K
Spicy
Spicy@betrcrypto·
HKXqzVUR84ATzN72mzAFAR4vZy1dWysWxTxVmc8oWtun $105k MC don’t miss
English
1
0
0
113
dan9 ⎸ Ultivese⚡️🐑 l 🐉 $MON l 🐟⛓️ รีทวีตแล้ว
JEREMY FALL
JEREMY FALL@jeremyfall·
airdropping the biggest airdrop yet, comment with your ETH wallets my goal is to onboard people onchain through food. in 48 hours we’ve airdropped over 50,000 tokens on @base. this one will be our biggest yet. drop your wallet, RT and tag anyone who should join our community
English
13.9K
5.4K
6.6K
485.4K