Tunnnnn🥷🏽🐺🎒

17.7K posts

Tunnnnn🥷🏽🐺🎒 banner
Tunnnnn🥷🏽🐺🎒

Tunnnnn🥷🏽🐺🎒

@darmich19

Crypto Game Lover| Blockchain Enthusiast | Member of Wolf Pack League on @Starknet https://t.co/Yzpcz0f293 | Elite; @backpack

Lagos. Nigeria. เข้าร่วม Ocak 2018
2K กำลังติดตาม751 ผู้ติดตาม
ทวีตที่ปักหมุด
Tunnnnn🥷🏽🐺🎒
Tunnnnn🥷🏽🐺🎒@darmich19·
Realms Blitz is not a “new game.” It’s a pressure mode inside @realms_gg, designed for people who don’t want to wait weeks to find out if they played well. Two hours. One map. One outcome. Blitz exists because Eternum seasons are long by design, A normal season can run for weeks until a player hits the victory condition and ends it. Blitz compresses that entire idea into a single, contained instance. Everything starts. Everything ends. Inside the same window. Each Blitz match runs for exactly two hours. No carryover. No withdrawals later. No bridging in or out. When the game ends, rewards are distributed immediately and the world resets. What you earn is what you earned in that session. You start with three identical Realms, placed apart in a triangle. No one has better land. No one has early advantages. What separates players is how fast they build, explore, and react under pressure. The goal is simple but unforgiving: accumulate more Victory Points than everyone else before time runs out. Victory Points come from expanding the map, claiming structures, holding key locations, and keeping control under attack. You can’t turtle. Someone will find you. Blitz forces interaction. You either wait for your neighbors to move, or you move first and force a fight. There’s no peaceful line where you quietly farm and hope for the best. Every decision leaks information. Every delay costs ground. The economy is simplified compared to a full Eternum season, but it still punishes bad planning. You build production, unlock more hexes, and expand faster or you stall and fall behind. Expansion is directly tied to how well you manage resources and labor. Materials exist for a reason, not as clutter. Basic resources like wood, stone, coal, and copper get your Realm off the ground. Higher-tier materials like ironwood, gold, adamantine, mithril, and dragonhide show up when you survive long enough to need efficiency and military depth. Food and logistics matter more than people expect. Wheat feeds everything. Donkeys move everything. No donkeys means no supply lines, no reinforcements, no flexibility. They only cost food, but running out at the wrong time ends games. Combat is not just about numbers. Armies have stamina. Terrain matters. Biomes change damage outcomes. A bad fight in the wrong biome can wipe an otherwise stronger army. Blitz rewards positioning and timing more than brute force. Victory Points decide the leaderboard. At the end of two hours, the top players share the prize pool, which is made entirely from entry fees paid into the game. There is no manual distribution. The chain settles it. For this round, entry is 250 $LORDS, with roughly 15k $LORDS in rewards for players who make it out on top. You don’t need a Realms NFT. You don’t need a Season Pass from Eternum. You just need to show up and play well. Blitz runs entirely on @Starknet. Movement, production, combat, conquest all enforced onchain. The speed comes from how the game is designed, not from skipping trust assumptions. It feels fast because the rules are tight. If you’re new, you can practice on testnet before touching mainnet. Same mechanics. Same pressure. No cost. Blitz is unforgiving, but it gives you room to learn before the stakes are real. One thing that makes this playable is @cartridge_gg controller. You don’t deal with seed phrases or clunky wallet popups. You can set it up with email or Discord, then log in using Face ID or fingerprint. It feels like a game login, not a crypto ritual. For wallets, Starknet players typically uses @myBraavos or @ready_co. Both work smoothly with the ecosystem. If you need $LORDS, you can swap directly on @avnu_fi without friction. Getting set up is no longer the hard part. Blitz isn’t about lore or grinding. It’s about decisions made under pressure, visible to everyone, and settled by the chain. If you think you’re good at strategy, Blitz won’t argue with you. It will just show you.
English
2
8
17
533
Tunnnnn🥷🏽🐺🎒 รีทวีตแล้ว
Starknet Ecosystem 🥷🏽
QSB replaces ECDSA with hash-based one-time signatures. The zk-STARK hatch uses hash-based proofs. BIP-360 proposes hash-based addresses. Every quantum defense ends up at the same place: hash functions over elliptic curves. Starknet's proving stack made that choice from day one.
English
0
6
10
219
Brother Hieuvu 🥷
Brother Hieuvu 🥷@hieuvueth·
Starknet fam Portfolio : -70% Mental health : Unstable Relationship : AI girlfriends $STRK: Up +10%
English
7
2
19
242
Tunnnnn🥷🏽🐺🎒 รีทวีตแล้ว
Tunnnnn🥷🏽🐺🎒 รีทวีตแล้ว
Eli Ben-Sasson | Starknet.io
Whether you believe quantum computers will become reality as soon as 2029 or decades from now, it doesn't matter. The potential alone will scare people, and there will come a point when whatever you're building will have to be quantum resistant. Only chains that will be quantum resistant will be truly future-proof. This is from @GoogleQuantumAI Paper.
Eli Ben-Sasson | Starknet.io tweet media
English
19
25
108
6.2K
BO$$MAN
BO$$MAN@Bosun_xuser·
@Donjaytrix001 @iamSwaga22 Una get problem for this app, he posted his mom, you complain. He post him nemesis, Una go still complain. Nawa for Una oh!!
English
25
6
409
46K
Tunnnnn🥷🏽🐺🎒 รีทวีตแล้ว
Brother Akash 🥷
Brother Akash 🥷@akashneelesh·
"Only protocols utilizing zkSTARKs (green) employ hash-based proofs that are currently believed to be resistant to quantum attacks." ~ @GoogleQuantumAI Paper. Starknet and the STWO prover is being recognized. bullish imo
Brother Akash 🥷 tweet media
English
13
20
80
10.5K
Tunnnnn🥷🏽🐺🎒 รีทวีตแล้ว
Brother Lyskey 🥷
So Google recognizes the superiority of Starknet’s tech. This new paper from the teams at Google Quantum AI, the Ethereum Foundation, Stanford University, and the University of California’s Computer Science department directly shows that Starknet stands out at the cryptographic architecture level. The paper presents zk-STARK-based systems (Starknet) as better positioned for quantum risk than stacks that rely on ECDSA, BLS, KZG, or pairing-based zkSNARKs (most of the crypto ecosystem). In a nutshell: quantum risk is a competitive advantage for Starknet. While most ecosystems built their scaling, accounts, bridges, or DA on cryptographic building blocks that are vulnerable for the quantum risk, Starknet has built a quantum-ready stack, positioning itself as one of the most future-proof infrastructures on the market. And that is not even the full picture. What this paper does not mention is: > Native Account Abstraction makes wallets upgradeable by design, so users should be able to migrate smoothly, in just one transaction > Post-quantum wallets are already possible on Starknet today. StarkWare has already shipped a proof of concept with tx running on Mainnet > The remaining pieces require relatively limited additional work on our side > Starknet is backed by some of the best cryptographers in the world So while Starknet’s transition is coded to be as smooth as possible, much of the industry still depends on elliptic-curve-heavy systems that will require painful migrations. TLDR: Starknet is ultra-scalable, brings massive compute onchain, will bring compliant privacy in a few weeks, and is ready for the post-quantum world. Incredible tech.
Brother Akash 🥷@akashneelesh

"Only protocols utilizing zkSTARKs (green) employ hash-based proofs that are currently believed to be resistant to quantum attacks." ~ @GoogleQuantumAI Paper. Starknet and the STWO prover is being recognized. bullish imo

English
5
9
43
5.7K
Tunnnnn🥷🏽🐺🎒 รีทวีตแล้ว
Starknet (Privacy arc) 🥷
Most of crypto will have to painfully adapt to a post-quantum world. Starknet was built with the right foundations from day one. Google sees it too.
Starknet (Privacy arc) 🥷 tweet media
English
16
28
137
11K
Tunnnnn🥷🏽🐺🎒 รีทวีตแล้ว
Starknet (Privacy arc) 🥷
1/ Starknet was built with quantum risk in mind from day one. STARKs are post-quantum resistant by nature. Native Account Abstraction makes wallets upgradeable by design. Post-quantum wallets are already possible on Starknet. And the remaining pieces require relatively little additional work from our side. In short, quantum computing is not a threat to Starknet’s future. If anything, it plays to Starknet’s strengths.
StarkWare 🥷@StarkWareLtd

1/ Post-quantum wallets are now live on Starknet. Starknet’s proving system was already post-quantum by design. Now wallets have a clear path there too. 🧵

English
16
26
153
23.2K
Tunnnnn🥷🏽🐺🎒 รีทวีตแล้ว
Starknet (Privacy arc) 🥷
Reminder: the vote for Starknet v0.14.2 ends tomorrow, April 16 at 5 PM CET. This upgrade is a major step forward for Starknet, unlocking infinite scaling via zkThreads, more efficient privacy, and decentralized validation later this year. Key unlocks: - in-protocol S-Two proof verification - revised storage economics - StarkGate token contract upgrades - internal improvements related to decentralization $STRK stakers and delegators, make sure to cast your vote before the deadline. snapshot.box/#/sn:0x009feda…
Starknet (Privacy arc) 🥷@Starknet

Starknet v0.14.2 is now up for vote. This upgrade includes SNIP-36, SNIP-37, and SNIP-13, alongside internal changes that prepare the network for the decentralized validation phase described in SNIP-33, planned for later this year. The release focuses on three main goals: - enabling in-protocol S-Two proof verification, a major unlock for lower-cost privacy use cases and zk-thread applications - revising storage economics to better reflect actual network resource usage while preserving cost-efficiency for developers - upgrading StarkGate token contracts to improve ERC-20 event indexing, verification, and token handling It also introduces internal upgrades tied to the next stage of decentralization, including p2p improvements, weighted proposer sampling, and the introduction of a virtual proposer concept. $STRK holders, please review the pre-release notes and linked SNIPs, then cast your vote. The vote ends on April 16. snapshot.box/#/sn:0x009feda…

English
7
11
95
9.1K
Tunnnnn🥷🏽🐺🎒
Blob Arena is back.!
Blob Arena@Blobarena

Blob Arena is back. Weekly Competition restarts today across Classic and @Armored_MMA . Welcome Quests and Achievements have been reset for everyone, so this is your chance to start fresh and climb from the beginning. Daily, weekly, and leaderboard resets are now live. Preseason does not count toward the new competition. Guild Competition registration opens this week. Best time to get back in 🏟️

English
1
0
5
48
Tunnnnn🥷🏽🐺🎒 รีทวีตแล้ว
Starknet (Privacy arc) 🥷
1/ Starkzap is seeing steady, organic adoption. And for good reason: it is a TypeScript SDK that lets builders fully abstract away blockchain complexity while unlocking new revenue lines for their business. Here are a few examples of what you can ship with it 🧵
Starknet (Privacy arc) 🥷 tweet media
Starknet (Privacy arc) 🥷@Starknet

1/ Starkzap v2 is here: a TypeScript SDK to turn any app into an onchain business. Swaps, lending, gasless txs, social login, Bitcoin staking, bridging, DCA, and confidential transfers. A complete money toolkit, now available to all 🧵

English
11
19
109
9.9K
Tunnnnn🥷🏽🐺🎒 รีทวีตแล้ว
brother victor (starkzap/acc)
"Ok, now make it private" Soon via Starknet
brother victor (starkzap/acc) tweet media
English
1
3
17
258
Tunnnnn🥷🏽🐺🎒
Quantum safe Bitcoin… yeah, we’re getting there. Join Starknet STARK Spaces tomorrow (Wednesday) at 3:00 PM CET with ser Eli Ben-Sasson & Avihu Levy This is one conversation you don’t want to miss. Follow Starknet & turn on notifications.
StarkWare 🥷@StarkWareLtd

Let’s discuss: Quantum-safe Bitcoin transactions! @avihu28’s paper sparked serious attention, and for a good reason. So it’s time to break it down and discuss it: - Did Avihu save Bitcoin? - Is this the perfect solution? - What should Bitcoin do about quantum computers? Join us tomorrow!

English
1
0
5
142
Tunnnnn🥷🏽🐺🎒 รีทวีตแล้ว
Eli Ben-Sasson | Starknet.io
Okay, as we all know, ZK-STARKs are post-quantum secure + blockchains should prepare for the quantum era + there has been a lot of discussions about @avihu28's Quantum-Safe Bitcoin Transactions paper. So, question: what would you like to ask/know about Bitcoin, STARKs, and quantum risks?
Eli Ben-Sasson | Starknet.io tweet media
English
20
10
92
4.6K
Tunnnnn🥷🏽🐺🎒 รีทวีตแล้ว
Starknet (Privacy arc) 🥷
One of the most important Bitcoin conversations is happening tomorrow. At 3 PM CET, @EliBenSasson and @avihu28 will explain how Bitcoin can become quantum-safe without a soft fork. Be early on this one 🫵
StarkWare 🥷@StarkWareLtd

Let’s discuss: Quantum-safe Bitcoin transactions! @avihu28’s paper sparked serious attention, and for a good reason. So it’s time to break it down and discuss it: - Did Avihu save Bitcoin? - Is this the perfect solution? - What should Bitcoin do about quantum computers? Join us tomorrow!

English
17
10
78
5.1K