Ashurī

9.4K posts

Ashurī

Ashurī

@derimanist

it's okay

เข้าร่วม Temmuz 2020
268 กำลังติดตาม341 ผู้ติดตาม
Ashurī รีทวีตแล้ว
Indo
Indo@bhagwa_mattick·
Some rare photos of Ngo Van Xuyet, the exiled Vietnamese Council Communist. 1. During a protest in 1998. 2. Beside his father's grave. 3. His sailor's identification card. 4. Self-portrait.
Indo tweet mediaIndo tweet mediaIndo tweet mediaIndo tweet media
English
0
5
19
243
Ashurī รีทวีตแล้ว
Donald J. Trump
Donald J. Trump@realDonaldTrump·
What a rotten deal we made with Iran. We get nothing (except laughter at our stupidity). They get everything, including delay and big cash!
English
1.4K
13.1K
33.9K
0
Ashurī รีทวีตแล้ว
lovebornee
lovebornee@lovebornee·
feel lot of arguments about the proletariat and the bourgeoisie qua coherent entities would do well to see that class is a relation of struggle: whoever toils under its sign lives a life cut and divided in and against itself. Gunn explains it well. libcom.org/article/notes-…
English
1
2
15
803
Ashurī รีทวีตแล้ว
Pegasus
Pegasus@StoryPegasus·
1/ By agreeing with the guy you implied that people who think SNLT is also demand-related haven't read Marx. So you can't really play the "you're being dogmatic" card. It's just a playful comeback 🥸 2/ It's not just a fight between Heinrich & Moseley. 3/ It *is* resolved.
Theryn@TherynDArnold

"marxists don't read marx" proceeds to treat one side of the unresolved Heinrich/Moseley fight over value-determination as the obviously correct reading that the rest of us are too illiterate to have arrived at.

English
1
1
16
3.6K
Ashurī รีทวีตแล้ว
Pegasus
Pegasus@StoryPegasus·
"Marxists don"t read Marx." *Proceeds to make the classic mistake about SNLT that Marxists who haven't read Marx make*
Pegasus tweet media
English
3
6
43
8.5K
Ashurī
Ashurī@derimanist·
@BolshevikCake @Sofishevik Your reading contradicts the text; 30 years later Marx makes an almost alike statement. That the state is abolished from the nascent of communism furthermore corresponds to Engels's description of the withering of the state as proportional to the abolition of commodity production
Ashurī tweet mediaAshurī tweet media
English
0
0
0
56
aarasteth🇵🇱🚩#IStandWithCuba
@derimanist @Sofishevik he wrote about a transistory phase ( dotp, the first degree of socialism ) between capitalism and communism. Both Marx and Engels agreed that state will eventualy wither away, but never said it should be abolished
English
2
0
2
77
☠Sofia☭♫⃠
☠Sofia☭♫⃠@Sofishevik·
"socialist state" states can't be socialist
Orbi 💜@OrbiOther

@Sofishevik If you think it wasn't socialism because in your mind there's a checklist of ideal characteristics a socialist state or territory must fulfill, then you're not familiar with the marxist method of interpreting history. There is no *should have* in history.

English
28
11
105
25K
Ashurī รีทวีตแล้ว
Omarovo4000
Omarovo4000@Omarovo4000·
hej kocko, nejsi ty princezna ze mlejna? protoze furt neco meles
Čeština
3
56
798
34.1K
Ashurī รีทวีตแล้ว
Wanderer
Wanderer@wood_eater_·
Maybe socialists would be better at fighting fascism if they stopped throwing that "anti-social" buzzword around and arguing ad nauseam that disability is a "flaw" that ought to be eliminated from the gene pool for the betterment of the human species
English
0
8
22
586
Ashurī รีทวีตแล้ว
Dialectical Zach-Zack Loeffler
Dialectical Zach-Zack Loeffler@thezachloeffler·
Everyone (paraphrased well by Alex Ross): Horkheimer and Adorno avoided the term “Marxism” and gave up on enlightenment reason. Horkheimer and Adorno: “the rescue of enlightenment is our concern,” and by “enlightenment,” we principally mean “the radical impulses of Marxism.”
English
2
14
144
8.4K
Ashurī รีทวีตแล้ว
Indo
Indo@bhagwa_mattick·
Crying bruh. Bordigists really think that their schema of party is unique and not technocratic just bcoz the workers will willingly give up their tasks to the Party. “We allow masses' initiatives but only within the limits of the party and there would be no separate initiative.”
English
6
11
87
7.6K
Ema
Ema@SmasherIsEma·
Do you guys think there are cis men who get on HRT for things like its benefits to the skin and hair growth and then just get a mastectomy later if they dont want tits I know there are gay men who get vaginoplasties so
English
12
0
53
1.5K
Ashurī
Ashurī@derimanist·
i keep going off and on estrogen cuz i neither want developed breasts nor twink death 😭
Kibii@Pibbibellyflop

English
0
0
1
114
Ashurī
Ashurī@derimanist·
@Inclamiente @EKuhberg Crusoe přímo předpokládá společnost, jinak by neexistoval resp. nenarodil se :)
Čeština
1
0
1
43
Inclamiente
Inclamiente@Inclamiente·
@derimanist @EKuhberg Ano je. Nicméně pokud si odmyslíme existenci spoelcnosit a uvažují jednoho člověka jako je Robinson Crusoe například, tak ten též drží soukromé výrobní prostředky. Tudíž k tomu spoelcnosit jako taková není potřeba. Stačí jeden člověk (to jsme spolu jiz řešili)
Čeština
2
0
0
43
Inclamiente
Inclamiente@Inclamiente·
Je neuvěřitelné, že lidem jako Prokop nejde principiálně vyhovět. Prostě všechno může být zadarmo, všechno může být dotované a stejně vám řeknou, že nase socialistické školství zdarma je moc pro bohate, že chytřejší rodiče dokáží lépe vybrat školy. To se už nedá parodovat
Vojtěch Bednář@aveius

je to téměř přesně naopak.

Čeština
8
4
172
8.1K
Inclamiente
Inclamiente@Inclamiente·
@EKuhberg Ano. Socialismus je definovány jako společenská kontrola výrobních prostředků. Povinná školní docházka je sama o sobě šílená, že stát to nařizuje sedět ve státní škole. Typická socialistická politika.
Čeština
2
0
0
148
Ashurī รีทวีตแล้ว
Regime Enjoyer ⚒️🍺
Regime Enjoyer ⚒️🍺@3mericanj0hnson·
"Communism lost the working class when it became the preserve of marginal bohemians: LGBTQ, abolitionists, mentally ill, etc"
michael michaels@michael180966

@Spiralhetre It wasn't Victorian prudery; it was general social morality. Communism lost the working class when it became the preserve of marginal bohemians: LGBTQ, abolitionists, mentally ill, etc

English
2
4
48
2.6K