dev.fun
1.1K posts

dev.fun
@devfun
accelerating early-stage projects | telegram: https://t.co/qvj3MoTQ4G

we're making @blocks smaller today. here's my note to the company. #### today we're making one of the hardest decisions in the history of our company: we're reducing our organization by nearly half, from over 10,000 people to just under 6,000. that means over 4,000 of you are being asked to leave or entering into consultation. i'll be straight about what's happening, why, and what it means for everyone. first off, if you're one of the people affected, you'll receive your salary for 20 weeks + 1 week per year of tenure, equity vested through the end of may, 6 months of health care, your corporate devices, and $5,000 to put toward whatever you need to help you in this transition (if you’re outside the U.S. you’ll receive similar support but exact details are going to vary based on local requirements). i want you to know that before anything else. everyone will be notified today, whether you're being asked to leave, entering consultation, or asked to stay. we're not making this decision because we're in trouble. our business is strong. gross profit continues to grow, we continue to serve more and more customers, and profitability is improving. but something has changed. we're already seeing that the intelligence tools we’re creating and using, paired with smaller and flatter teams, are enabling a new way of working which fundamentally changes what it means to build and run a company. and that's accelerating rapidly. i had two options: cut gradually over months or years as this shift plays out, or be honest about where we are and act on it now. i chose the latter. repeated rounds of cuts are destructive to morale, to focus, and to the trust that customers and shareholders place in our ability to lead. i'd rather take a hard, clear action now and build from a position we believe in than manage a slow reduction of people toward the same outcome. a smaller company also gives us the space to grow our business the right way, on our own terms, instead of constantly reacting to market pressures. a decision at this scale carries risk. but so does standing still. we've done a full review to determine the roles and people we require to reliably grow the business from here, and we've pressure-tested those decisions from multiple angles. i accept that we may have gotten some of them wrong, and we've built in flexibility to account for that, and do the right thing for our customers. we're not going to just disappear people from slack and email and pretend they were never here. communication channels will stay open through thursday evening (pacific) so everyone can say goodbye properly, and share whatever you wish. i'll also be hosting a live video session to thank everyone at 3:35pm pacific. i know doing it this way might feel awkward. i'd rather it feel awkward and human than efficient and cold. to those of you leaving…i’m grateful for you, and i’m sorry to put you through this. you built what this company is today. that's a fact that i'll honor forever. this decision is not a reflection of what you contributed. you will be a great contributor to any organization going forward. to those staying…i made this decision, and i'll own it. what i'm asking of you is to build with me. we're going to build this company with intelligence at the core of everything we do. how we work, how we create, how we serve our customers. our customers will feel this shift too, and we're going to help them navigate it: towards a future where they can build their own features directly, composed of our capabilities and served through our interfaces. that's what i'm focused on now. expect a note from me tomorrow. jack


From @garrytan on what keeps him up at night: "99% of people who apply to YC get rejected. And it keeps me up at night. Up to half of any one batch may have been previously rejected before getting in. It's quite common to apply 2-4x before getting in. We get 80,000 applications per year. We're always worried we're over rotating in any direction. Too big can be bad. Too small can also be bad. And right now, there are clearly way more capable founders that we're rejecting. And if you can stand being rejected a few times, you're cut out to be a founder. Being a founder requires an insane amount of resilience. One rejection shouldn't hold you back. A really good founder would say, they got this wrong, and I'm gonna prove myself right. And we love that."

markets are quite, noise is gone this is your opportunity to ship & be heard





Introducing the $3,000,000 Build in Public Hackathon Brought to you by Pump Fund - pump fun’s New Investment Arm It’s time to completely reimagine how early-stage projects are built and funded. Learn more 👇

Introducing: Permissionless Initial Pump Offerings (IPOs) ⚡️ IPOs let any early-stage Project raise up to 300 Sol, while allowing traders to bet on early-stage teams Launch or back your first IPO today. More info below 👇









