Digital Arbitrageur

@mrjc1 @HSHK2021 Exactly, cause Jesus prayed to the Father and that is shirk in Islam. Jesus should be in Hell if Islam is true (like the Talmud teaches). But Muslims believe Jesus was a prophet, is in heaven with God right now, and coming back to judge the earth. Very confusing.

@HSHK2021 @digitalarbit Jesus as a prophet in Islam is actually very problematic.

American Author Garry Wills: “As a Christian, I consider Jesus a prophet but, he’s a prophet of One God and not several.”

@HSHK2021 Yeah those aren’t Christians. Mormons are Christians either. A Christian is another who follows the Biblical teachings of Jesus Christ and wavier from those teachings. If this guy is follow the Quran or Muhammad he is a Muslim. Calling himself a Christian is deceptive.

@digitalarbit Some groups like Unitarians or Jehovah’s Witnesses reject Jesus’ deity but aren’t Muslim. So the statement conflates theology and labels incorrectly.

@2BLibre That’s not what I’m saying dude. He claimed to be a Christian and follow the Quran. That’s like saying “I’m an Apple tree come here and pick my oranges.”

@digitalarbit Soley denying jesus was more than a messenger does not make someone muslim -jesus didn't claim it, God isn't a name nor heard of prior to recent centuries & he never said he was god, a god, trinity, nor call anyone to worship him] la ilaha ilallah, muhammadan rasoolullah [caps?]

@kai66507781 @IslamicPackers @muslimorthodoxy Yes he did. Luke 4:14-30

@digitalarbit @IslamicPackers @muslimorthodoxy I don’t think he did.

Genesis 17 proves that Muhammad ﷺ is a true Prophet. After speaking with @muslimorthodoxy, Christian Nate concludes that Muhammad ﷺ is the final Prophet. “It is not the eyes that are blind, but the hearts within the chests.” (Qur’an 22:46) Christians, what do you think?

@kai66507781 @IslamicPackers @muslimorthodoxy You right on that front but still wrong overall. Matthew 1:16 mentions that Joseph is the husband of Mary. So that would mean Mary’s genealogy is in Matthew and Joseph’s genealogy is in Luke. Either way those two genealogy’s lead to Jesus one is Mary’s and the other is Joseph’s.

@digitalarbit @IslamicPackers @muslimorthodoxy Why don’t you read? The greek septuagent, which was written before the NT, uses the word son in law, in greek. Did you even research this stiff before saying it? Are you just pulling things out of your __

@kai66507781 @IslamicPackers @muslimorthodoxy The Quran doesn’t even belong in the same sentence with the Bible. All this yapping and Allah still denies prophethood to Muhammad in his book that he wrote. Surah 29:27 is the nail in your satanic death cult.

@digitalarbit @IslamicPackers @muslimorthodoxy Nope. You’re conflating concepts and regurgitating worthless points. If a part of the Quran was lost by way of a goat eating a page or other than that then it’s simply abrogated and so the Quran is still complete. And 1 book in multiple variant readings is still one book.

@kai66507781 @IslamicPackers @muslimorthodoxy I misunderstood. Regardless if it wasn’t Babylon, it was the Roman Empire. Either way it’s a prophecy about Jesus Christ and he confirmed it when He was here.

@digitalarbit @IslamicPackers @muslimorthodoxy Bud, the verses say that the child will be born *before* the kingdoms falls.

@animal_loverCA @NBCSGiants All wrong. Biblical Jesus. Who’s crying? I’m just point out hypocrisy and how the media works.

@digitalarbit @NBCSGiants Pretty sure jesus wouldn't have been a crypto loving crybaby

Bryce Eldridge has an emotional reaction after being told he's the youngest MLB player ever to hit a walk-off grand slam 🥹

@kai66507781 @IslamicPackers @muslimorthodoxy Wrong again! Babylon fell in 593 BC and Jesus was born after this. Fulfilling the prophecy.

@digitalarbit @IslamicPackers @muslimorthodoxy this is verse 16 talking about the same child; 16 for before the boy knows enough to reject the wrong and choose the right, the land of the two kings you dread will be laid waste. So it says exactly *when* Immanuel will be born. Jesus is 600 years too late.

@kai66507781 @IslamicPackers @muslimorthodoxy I’m not wrong. In the time this passage was written the word for “son in law” in Koine Greek didn’t exist. You are going by the language as it is today. Stop lying!

@digitalarbit @IslamicPackers @muslimorthodoxy You’re wrong. And they are 2 different lineages because the authors didn’t know what they were talking about.

@kai66507781 @IslamicPackers @muslimorthodoxy Another lie. Yes Muslim lie and say there is only one Quran. They never even mention the other variations. That’s lying and being deceptive. No they aren’t perfectly preserved. Aisha said that a sheep or goat eat parts of the Quran. You Muslims only have lies to hold onto.

@digitalarbit @IslamicPackers @muslimorthodoxy Nobody argues that there aren’t variation between modes but they’re all established from the 1st century AH and perfectly preserved from the prophet. The bible has variations which none of them are authorized. This is why the bible is corrupt and the Quran isn’t.

@kai66507781 @IslamicPackers @muslimorthodoxy You are dead wrong. Jesus taught from the scrolls of Isaiah and said the prophecy was about Him.

@digitalarbit @IslamicPackers @muslimorthodoxy No it’s not. It’s about a child to be born in the kingdom during the time of the struggle. It’s literally in the context. Nobody ever mentions a messiah 600 years later.

@TommyCandlish @Kryptotajeer True. I’m giving the Muslims the benefit of the doubt saying he goes back to Ishmael’s lineage. Even if Muhammad is apart of Ishmael lineage (which he isn’t) he still isn’t a prophet according to their god Allah in their own book. 😬

@digitalarbit @Kryptotajeer He's not even a defendant of ishmiel. Ishmiel's mother was Egyptian and his father hebrew, a liniage mohammed did not have. He was just an arab.

Korra exposed another false prophecy claim in the Bible! Matthew was intentionally reading the Messiah back into the Old Testament, taking passages out of their original context and presenting them as prophecies about Jesus. Many of these so called “messianic prophecies” are actually the work of Matthew’s interpretation rather than what the original Old Testament authors intended. @korrathetaymi

@Kryptotajeer It’s in Isaiah 11:1. The word for branch in Hebrew is netser. When written in Hebrew it’s NZR which are the exact same consonants used as Nazareth. In Aramaic, the word for Nazareth and the Hebrew word for branch sound almost identical. This is what Matthew is referring.

@Eldridgeisking No pitching at all.

The Giants are the first team to 1000 total bases after BRYCE ELDRIDGE’S WALK OFF GRAND SLAM

@John316apologia @1lifegl @GodLogic_GL Islam the cult of yes and no.

This video will tell you what you need to know about MUSLIMS & ISLAM! They’ll start something, and they’ll be ones CRYING when people join them in the race🙇‍♂️ This video speaks so volume about MUSLIMS. @1lifegl @GodLogic_GL

@kai66507781 @IslamicPackers @muslimorthodoxy No it’s clearly two different people’s genealogy. Luke was written in Koine Greek. The reason it doesn’t say son in law is because there is no word for son in law in Koine Greek. It’s just the word for son. There is no error or contradiction in the two genealogies.

@digitalarbit @IslamicPackers @muslimorthodoxy Yea, they’re 2 different genealogies because it’s a contradiction. Not because the 2 authors intentionally made them different. Matt had no clue what luke was writing. And no, there are 0 instances in the past where a woman’s husbands name takes her place in her genealogy.