Wiyarni Pambudi

Singkatnya: distribusi susu formula lanjutan & susu pertumbuhan untuk bayi <2 tahun tidak diperlukan, berisiko, dan bertentangan dengan pedoman global. BGN plis kaji ulang kebijakan seperti ini demi kesehatan anak Indonesia.

Jika tujuan program adalah menurunkan stunting, maka pendekatan ini justru bisa kontraproduktif. Menyusui dan MPASI berkualitas tetap intervensi paling efektif dan efisien.

Sekadar berbagi opini tentang materi sosialisasi BGN soal distribusi formula lanjutan & susu pertumbuhan untuk bayi <2 tahun dalam program MBG 2026. Program ini berencana membagikan follow-up formula dan growing-up milk untuk bayi–anak <2 tahun: bit.ly/SusuMBG2026

Pedoman global yang direkomendasi WHO-UNICEF, AAP, dll, sudah sangat jelas: bayi 0–6 bulan: ASI eksklusif, 6–24 bulan: ASI + MPASI. Tidak ada rekomendasi distribusi massal formula untuk bayi sehat.

Kenapa ini problematik? Masalahnya: produk ini bukan kebutuhan dasar gizi, tapi produk komersial, bertentangan dengan prinsip IYCF (pemberian makan bayi-baduta) dan melanggar pedoman global terkait BMS Code (kode untuk mengatur promosi pengganti ASI).

Applies to all health professionals. And my most sincere recognition to GP coleagues, who are enslaved with exhausting schedules and the lowest salaries in the job market.

@lutfithe13th Dan dibiarkan, semua menganggap normal bertahun tahun. Gerakan menolak kalah dgn gerakan pendiaman.

@AIandTechh87 Guide

I built a FREE 3-Day “Claude Cowork for Beginners” course. In just 3 days, you’ll set up an AI teammate on your computer that: • knows your writing style • connects to your tools • produces finished work you can send instantly Inside the course: Day 1: Set up Cowork + run your first real task (15 mins) Day 2: Powerful workflows — build landing pages & run competitor analysis with one prompt Day 3: Skills, plugins & connectors so Cowork works the way you do •Copy-paste prompts so you can follow along easily. Comment “Guide” Follow @AIandTechh87 I’ll send it to you. 🚀

@effendii_ CLAUDE

Btww, lu mau ga contoh template CLAUDE.md lengkap yang gw pakee? Kalau mau, komen "CLAUDE" di bawah yaak! Wajib follow, like, dan retweet biar bisaa gw DM yaa Semogaa bermanfaat gaiss!

GAISSS, KALAU LU PAKE CLAUDE CODE, LU WAJIBB BANGET PASTIIN SETUP CLAUDE.MD YANG BENERR!! Jadii buat yang belum tau, CLAUDE.MD itu tu bukan file rules biasaa yaa. Ini beneran otak yang ngatur gimana sih perilaku Agent di Claude Code lu. Gw banyaak banget nemu yang CLAUDE.md-nya itu ngasalll banget. Pendek, terus yaa seadanya aja. Teruss udah begitu, malah heran kenapa hasil Claude-nya masih sering nguawur wkwkwk. Gw juga dulu gitu awalnya. Terus gw cobaa ngulik2 lah yaa, gimana nii caranya setup yang bener. Dann abis itu, beneran doong, langsung JAGO si Claude nya wkwkwk. Minim marah-marah lah yaa gw jadinya. Sinii gw bahas caraa bikin CLAUDE.md yang beneran mantapp yaa 👇🏻

Nyata

@lutfithe13th @1212MAonTWT Panduan di siaga.kemdiktisaintek.go.id prodi spesialis minimal diampu 3 konsulen + 2 spesialis setara KKNI 9 (S3) dg persyaratan lain-lain

@1212MAonTWT Dok, sebetulnya syarat membuka prodi PPDS baik di univ maupun hospital based ini apa sih? Bisa lihat di mana? Masa ada RSUD dgn 3 spesialis yg 1 udah purna boleh buka PPDS hospital based..

ICW bongkar MBG. Program Makan Bergizi Gratis yang katanya demi anak-anak, ternyata dapurnya dikelola yayasan-yayasan dengan afiliasi politik, bisnis, birokrasi, militer, sampai relawan kampanye Pilpres 2024. Angkanya bukan recehan: • 28 yayasan terafiliasi partai politik • 18 yayasan terafiliasi pebisnis/swasta • Sisanya nyambung ke birokrasi, aparat, dan tim sukses Dan juaranya? Gerindra paling banyak. Disusul PKS dan PAN. Bonus round: ada 4 anggota legislatif aktif ikut nimbrung. Lebih bonus lagi: ada nama yang pernah tersangkut kasus korupsi. Jadi pertanyaannya sederhana, tapi bikin panas: Ini program gizi anak… atau program bagi-bagi akses APBN dengan baju amal? Kalau dapur umum diisi kepentingan politik, yang kenyang siapa? Anaknya, atau jejaring kekuasaannya?

BREASTMILK She thought she was studying milk. What she uncovered was a conversation. In 2008, evolutionary anthropologist Katie Hinde was working in a primate research lab in California, analyzing breast milk from rhesus macaque mothers. She had hundreds of samples and thousands of data points. Everything looked ordinary—until one pattern refused to go away. Mothers raising sons produced milk richer in fat and protein. Mothers raising daughters produced a larger volume with different nutrient balances. It was consistent. Repeatable. And deeply uncomfortable for the scientific consensus. Colleagues suggested error. Noise. Statistical coincidence. But Katie trusted the data. And the data pointed to a radical idea. Milk is not just nutrition. It is information. For decades, biology treated breast milk as simple fuel. Calories in. Growth out. But if milk were only calories, why would it change depending on the sex of the baby? Katie kept digging. Across more than 250 mothers and over 700 sampling events, the story grew more complex. Younger, first-time mothers produced milk with fewer calories but significantly higher levels of cortisol—the stress hormone. The babies who drank it grew faster. They were also more alert, more cautious, more anxious. Milk wasn’t just building bodies. It was shaping behavior. Then came the discovery that changed everything. When a baby nurses, microscopic amounts of saliva flow back into the breast. That saliva carries biological signals about the infant’s immune system. If the baby is getting sick, the mother’s body detects it. Within hours, the milk changes. White blood cells surge. Macrophages multiply. Targeted antibodies appear. When the baby recovers, the milk returns to baseline. This was not coincidence. It was call and response. A biological dialogue refined over millions of years. Invisible—until someone thought to listen. As Katie reviewed existing research, she noticed something unsettling. There were twice as many scientific studies on erectile dysfunction as on breast milk composition. The first food every human consumes. The substance that shaped our species. Largely ignored. So she did something bold. She launched a blog with a deliberately provocative name: Mammals Suck Milk. It exploded. Over a million readers in its first year. Parents. Doctors. Scientists. People asking questions research had skipped. The discoveries kept coming. Milk changes by time of day. Foremilk differs from hindmilk. Human milk contains over 200 oligosaccharides babies can’t digest—because they exist to feed beneficial gut bacteria. Every mother’s milk is biologically unique. In 2017, Katie brought this work to a TED stage. In 2020, it reached a global audience through Netflix’s Babies. Today, at Arizona State University’s Comparative Lactation Lab, she continues reshaping how medicine understands infant development, neonatal care, formula design, and public health. The implications are staggering. Milk has been evolving for more than 200 million years—longer than dinosaurs walked the Earth. What we once dismissed as simple nourishment is one of the most sophisticated communication systems biology has ever produced. Katie Hinde didn’t just study milk. She revealed that nourishment is intelligence. A living, responsive system shaping who we become before we ever speak. All because one scientist refused to accept that half the story was “measurement error.” Sometimes the biggest revolutions begin by listening to what everyone else ignores.