Eric Weinstein

24.8K posts

Eric Weinstein banner
Eric Weinstein

Eric Weinstein

@ericweinstein

Mostly Mathematics, Markets, Physics, Finance, Risk, Immigration, Policy, Music, Economics, Society, Kayfabe, Technology and Tropical Fruit.

Los Angeles เข้าร่วม Nisan 2009
989 กำลังติดตาม1.1M ผู้ติดตาม
ทวีตที่ปักหมุด
Eric Weinstein
Eric Weinstein@ericweinstein·
What really happened on @PiersUncensored? You’d *never* believe it if I told you. Here:
English
1.9K
1.7K
14.2K
2.6M
Eric Weinstein
Eric Weinstein@ericweinstein·
You can’t stop this train this way. All the cheerleading for private development of AI…and we still wind up here. This AI, as I have said before, is a malfunctioning bleeding-edge military-grade research project sold direct to consumer for reasons that remain somewhat unclear.
David Sacks@DavidSacks

I’ve had a number of conversations with folks inside and outside government about the current situation with Anthropic, and here is what I believe to be true: — As we know, Anthropic publicly released its Mythos class models earlier this week under the commercial name Fable. — Fable is Mythos with guardrails. But if those guardrails fail, then you’ve exposed Mythos and its advanced cyber capabilities to people who shouldn’t have them. (Keep in mind that Anthropic itself widely promoted the idea that Mythos was a cyberweapon and needed to be regulated as such. They asked for government regulation of Mythos and championed the guardrails on Fable. If there is a vulnerability — big or small — it is Anthropic’s responsibility to patch.) — A highly credible trusted partner of both Anthropic and the USG who was testing Fable came forward with a jailbreak of those guardrails. The Admin asked Dario to fix the jailbreak or de-deploy the model. Dario refused. — In their blog post, Anthropic defended its decision by saying the jailbreak isn’t serious. That is not what the trusted partner and the USG believe; nor is that kind of minimizing language consistent with Anthropic’s brand as the AI safety company. It’s difficult to fathom how they could claim a jailbreak allowing operability of a cyber weapon could be defined as not “serious.” — In the past, Anthropic has always said that safety must be top priority and taken super seriously. In this case, Anthropic prioritized the continued offering of the consumer model over safety. — In reaction, the Admin issued the export control. The Admin did this reluctantly. It’s been very surprised that Anthropic hasn’t wanted to cooperate with a reasonable safety request (ie fixing the jailbreak issue). Anthropic’s reaction is very much at odds with their branding and ethos as a safe AI research community. — The Admin’s hope now is that Anthropic remediates the safety issue, the export control is lifted, and Fable goes back into general release. The Admin wants all of this to happen as soon as possible. It is frankly bewildered that Anthropic hasn’t wanted to comply with safety requests that it previously said were its highest priority. — Those trying to misdirect and tie this action to the prior DoW/Anthropic issues are wrong. The Admin values Anthropic’s technical capabilities and feels that this issue, while serious, should be easily resolved. The ball is in Anthropic’s court.

English
85
44
585
96.5K
Eric Weinstein
Eric Weinstein@ericweinstein·
This isn’t a sex scandal. This is a kid scandal.
English
16
3
169
12.4K
Eric Weinstein
Eric Weinstein@ericweinstein·
We have to stop making excuses for our political elite involved in this coverup.
English
33
44
768
21.2K
Eric Weinstein
Eric Weinstein@ericweinstein·
For those of you asking about the random heartwarming reel: yes I meant it. I feel like no family with little kids can defend itself from state-sponsored predation with elite coverup. Not one dad can get justice for his children. Not one single dad. No matter how capable.
English
16
31
590
20.4K
Eric Weinstein
Eric Weinstein@ericweinstein·
Let’s talk about Epstein. Whatever the cost. There is nothing preventing disclosure. Well, except “Sources and Methods.” Let’s get this over with. Now. instagram.com/reel/DXkvFFHjv…
English
44
60
797
40.1K
Eric Weinstein รีทวีตแล้ว
santi
santi@santisiri·
gracias por la enorme cantidad de mensajes y comentarios que estoy recibiendo sobre la entrevista con @ericweinstein. fue una conversación realmente apasionante de hacer: más de 90 minutos donde no dejamos tema sin tocar, desde peter thiel, milei e inteligencia artificial hasta inflación, física, trabajo, dignidad y el futuro de nuestra especie. la generosidad intelectual de eric fue asombrosa y le estoy profundamente agradecido por el tiempo, la apertura y la honestidad. si esta charla ayuda aunque sea un poco a que más argentinos 🇦🇷 entiendan mejor de qué va todo esto y los debates que vienen, entonces valió completamente la pena. acá 👇 está completa para que la disfruten durante el fin de semana o en algún largo viaje. entrevistas como esta ocurren pocas veces en la vida y creo que su escucha atenta vale mucho la pena. afortunadamente así lo reflejan muchos de los comentarios hechos con buena fe. youtu.be/4V6jl0OEcqc?si…
YouTube video
YouTube
Español
34
42
346
65.1K
Eric Weinstein
Eric Weinstein@ericweinstein·
@Briankeating The problem is our most famous QG colleagues Brian and their egregious behavior towards competitors.
English
1
0
18
1.4K
Eric Weinstein
Eric Weinstein@ericweinstein·
@Briankeating I don’t know about Russia for the 8 years between 1992 and 1984. But the problem is toxic anti-collegiality of TOGiT and the misunderstanding of Ken Wilson.
English
6
0
46
2.3K
Prof. Brian Keating
Prof. Brian Keating@Briankeating·
@ericweinstein Sounds like a Great Leap Forward! But seriously, if string theory is so pernicious, why did physics in the USSR _also_ stagnate? They were/are just as smart as western physicists, but never ‘stringified ‘to begin with.
English
8
0
36
2.9K
Eric Weinstein
Eric Weinstein@ericweinstein·
Specifically: I’d first look at what promising approaches to post-Einsteinian science were we induced to abandon by Quantum Gravity/StringTheorists. I’d spend the first 1/2 million dollars simply destringifying the last 42 lost years. Then I would look at all the major ideas without ANY refereeing input from string theory/m-theory: Chern Simons Asymptotic safety GU Einstein Cartan McDowell Mansouri Spin connections Strings Gravitational Amplitudes Etc. Then based on that assessment, I would allocate grants to push for the spacetime successor. But the first allocation is to destringification. We need to stop being brainwashed by 5 people and their misinterpretation of Ken Wilson. We need to realize that the real physics that we would need to travel the cosmos got nerfed. By string theory. The first task is undoing the murderous anti-scientific lie and culture of TOGIT as spread by Witten, Susskind, Greene, Kaku, Gross and company. Just undoing that and making it viable to do theoretical physics without their fingers around our throats would bring us far closer to post Einsteinian engineering. Gravitational physics has become a lie under quantum gravity.
Prof. Brian Keating@Briankeating

@ericweinstein @elonmusk How exactly do we ‘allocate’ it? It’s not like saying yes when asked “do you want guac with your Chipotle bowl?” If you were Elon, how would you do it? Specifics please.

English
73
67
572
68K
Eric Weinstein
Eric Weinstein@ericweinstein·
@ARICKartist No. But thanks for asking. You can do your own work, but if the field predecides that the answer can only be within the Witten/Susskind poisoned narrative, it won’t matter. How many people do you hear naming the problem? Very few. Out of terror and fear. And they aren’t wrong.
English
4
1
33
974
ARICK
ARICK@ARICKartist·
@ericweinstein Just trying to understand … String Theory and M Theory last I checked was a Theory not a law. So what is the chokehold here? Can’t you just do your own research and disregard the theories?!
English
1
0
1
972
Eric Weinstein
Eric Weinstein@ericweinstein·
So it doesn’t add up in a BIG way. I trust that Grusch believes what he is saying. And many other people have said similar highly CONCRETE things. I have ZERO hard evidence of what they describe. I assign very high probability that there are unacknowledged special access programs being described. I have no particular belief that they contain 👽 or 🛸. So: what is my personal failing here? Or do you wanna walk that back. Be specific.
English
28
9
167
6.3K
Mick West
Mick West@MickWest·
@ericweinstein The human failings here are a desire to assign significant agency to events and a willingness to trust someone who is telling you stories without providing evidence. I agree it doesn't add up. That does not mean Grusch is accurate.
English
14
1
28
2.8K
Eric Weinstein
Eric Weinstein@ericweinstein·
I’ve spoken to David Grusch many times. There is nothing obviously wrong with him. At all. Stop using the ‘argument’ that everything for which you are not ready miraculously only comes from dismissible people. It’s just not working all that well anymore: Something is going on.
herald of the summer storms@blessedlyunwoke

@ericweinstein @ChrisCuomo The correct processing for David Grusch is that he is nuts. Although watching intelligent people fall for this con is enough to leave the uninfected unhinged.

English
171
221
2.5K
158.1K
Eric Weinstein
Eric Weinstein@ericweinstein·
Nope. For 2 reasons. A) don’t think that Mars and the Moon are stepping stones, anymore than swimming to Martha’s Vineyard from Cape Cod prepares you to swim nonstop to Namibia. B) A zero allocation is a huge clue. There is no obvious reason at around a trillion dollars not to have an interstellar physics group unless you really don’t want one. I don’t think he drives a ford pinto not because he can’t afford it. He doesn’t want one. Same for an interstellar physics group. I think he really doesn’t want one. Not first things first.
English
17
2
46
1.3K
Steve Skojec
Steve Skojec@SteveSkojec·
@ericweinstein @elonmusk Do you think maybe it's just a "first thing's first" approach to this issue? As in, we have chemical rocket tech now, and we don't know how far in the future something else may be, and he wants to see this happen in his lifetime?
English
3
0
13
1.4K
Eric Weinstein
Eric Weinstein@ericweinstein·
“Anywhere in the Solar System….and maybe *beyond* the Solar System at some point.” -@elonmusk If only we would allocate 0.01% of the chemical rocket budget to interstellar. There has to be a reason this is like 100% vs 0.0% rather than 99.99% to 0.01%. Congrats all the same!
Elon Musk@elonmusk

English
86
33
597
56.7K