Ayush Goyal

3.1K posts

Ayush Goyal banner
Ayush Goyal

Ayush Goyal

@goyalayus

@iitroorkee | 20 | reinforcement learning | ex - https://t.co/0QVBIHhQeD

เข้าร่วม Şubat 2023
432 กำลังติดตาม197 ผู้ติดตาม
ทวีตที่ปักหมุด
Ayush Goyal
Ayush Goyal@goyalayus·
If you are someone who is into post-training models over unsloth, we just made your life 10x easier.
English
4
11
85
6.7K
Ayush Goyal
Ayush Goyal@goyalayus·
@henrytdowling currently its reinforcement learning, down the line its going to be either RL sample efficiency or interpretability
English
0
0
0
10
Ayush Goyal
Ayush Goyal@goyalayus·
I am going to become one of the greatest researchers, pair up with a great systems programmer and a great designer and take humanity to the next level
English
11
1
61
2.9K
Ayush Goyal
Ayush Goyal@goyalayus·
the algorithm is too much slop
English
0
0
1
159
Jotaro
Jotaro@geometricZed·
@goyalayus If u go for linear algebra, try Linear Algebra Done Right by Sheldon Axler
English
2
0
1
14
Ayush Goyal
Ayush Goyal@goyalayus·
I am stuck on this, I have tried. tried a lot. every llm. none can make me understand it. i'll have to use some brain, i hate it. I just have to read it. no immidiate use. no beauty.
Ayush Goyal tweet media
English
1
0
0
127
Jotaro
Jotaro@geometricZed·
@goyalayus Man wtf , u won't believe me but that's the exact book i am following 💀💀Co incidence?? Damnnn
English
1
0
1
14
Ayush Goyal
Ayush Goyal@goyalayus·
So, computer science is a game whose rules are created by humans, and then all the algorithms and all the optimizations just respect those rules. Mathematics is a game where the rules have been created by the universe, and we don't know the rules. So, we figure out algorithms and test if they match the previous algorithms. So, whenever you find an algorithm in math, it becomes a rule, and the next algorithm has to respect the previous rule, the previous algorithm. So, I think models will become really great at optimizing or discovering every algorithm for rules when all the rules are known. But when the rules are unknown, like in mathematics, models may or may not saturate it. But rules which have been made by humans, models will saturate them. For example, systems programming. But the thing is, the rules of physics are not made by models, so the rules of hardware are kind of not made by models. And then, so when the rules of hardware change—no, so because the rules of hardware are not known by models or humans, the algorithms can be discovered iteratively, and that makes the roots of software update. So, I think that's the reason models will not be able to saturate computer programming, also.
English
0
0
2
293
Ayush Goyal รีทวีตแล้ว
Yash Dugriyal
Yash Dugriyal@0xVoyd·
some weeks back I made a thing github.com/0xV0YD/Mnemosy… because I kept losing the thread between agent chats it stores the conversations along the way, organizes them into useful memory, and uses retrieval algorithms to remember decisions we made earlier when a similar topic comes up again. not limited to Codex either: plug it into multiple IDEs/editors through MCP and the memory layer can travel with the work. local-first, searchable, source-cited memory for coding agents. u can try it out
Yash Dugriyal tweet media
English
1
2
14
470
Ayush Goyal
Ayush Goyal@goyalayus·
I am kinda happy I took the JEE; I think it really helped me think. they could have, though, removed chemistry from it and focused on going deep in a few chapters in phy and maths, and just covering other chapters like complex numbers in shallow depth
English
0
0
3
207
Yash Dugriyal
Yash Dugriyal@0xVoyd·
so the difference is that DP already knows what moves it can make then it figures out corret possible ways while RL also have to fiugure out the possible moves along with the path as the possible moves will be the ones which would lead to the correct goal
English
1
0
4
420
Kush
Kush@notthatkush·
people in 2026: 1) without reading pass the problem to claude/gpt 2) don't think at all 3) solution's ready it is crazy how often i see this during interviews and when meeting people who seem really smart. it is honestly bonkers how many people have genuinely forgotten how to think
gabe@gabekahen_

@mathemetica

English
2
0
5
215
Ayush Goyal
Ayush Goyal@goyalayus·
Can somebody launch a DeepSeek 4 Flash-level model? Not V Flash, V4 Pro-level model, for ultra, ultra cheap? Like, if I use even a billion tokens, it would cost me a dollar or something. That would be great.
English
0
0
0
88
Ayush Goyal
Ayush Goyal@goyalayus·
I was reading some stuff from... There's this guy who is an expert on async RL, and I was reading some stuff from him on RL algorithms, and I just realized that, fuck, I don't know any crop stats. I just forgot everything I knew. So, very ashamed of myself. I want to be a researcher, but then I don't know the basics. So I went in and thought that this would be the last time I would be studying mathematics. But this time, I would be studying it for life. By life, I mean I will not forget the things that I am studying for life.
English
1
0
1
9
Jotaro
Jotaro@geometricZed·
@goyalayus Kya hua bhai itna frustrated kyu hai Maths ko leke ? 😭😭
हिन्दी
1
0
1
22
Ayush Goyal
Ayush Goyal@goyalayus·
I feel sad for the people who took crash course in mathmatics
English
1
0
0
87
Ayush Goyal
Ayush Goyal@goyalayus·
If you are studying mathematics purely from Gemini, I would not recommend it. Pick up a good book. For example, if you are... Yeah, so pick up a good book and then study from that. Use Gemini for considering your signs. Also, Gemini Flash sometimes hallucinates. It will give you proofs that are not useful. So use thinking mode sometimes when you need it. It's useful to regularly think.
English
1
0
1
13
Jotaro
Jotaro@geometricZed·
@goyalayus Us , I've been studying Maths with the assistance of Gemini flash extended nd it just feels way superior to GPT (have used gpt top for same purpose them switched to be in nd I'm glad I did)
English
1
0
1
22
Ayush Goyal
Ayush Goyal@goyalayus·
I constantly find Gemini 3.5 flash a great teacher, somehow it gets me.
English
1
0
2
93
Ayush Goyal
Ayush Goyal@goyalayus·
@youdesignn40682 how sure are you at historical humans were only based on survival majorly and not on love
English
1
0
0
16
@Subhidesignns
@Subhidesignns@youdesignn40682·
@goyalayus They are something thats constant .. but if we talk about Historical human .. they were based on survival , love was idea of elite
English
1
0
0
15
Ayush Goyal
Ayush Goyal@goyalayus·
I wonder, someone born in 18th CE, what meaning do they have to their life? They can't fly in airplanes. They can't live in air conditioning. They can't have many friends because if they move out of the city, they lose them forever. Their spouses, they can't choose their spouses either. They have to work all over their life. Life is pretty miserable, you know. I wonder why they would not be depressed. But then I think about myself, and some other Ayush who is from two years in the future would be looking down on me and saying the same things about me: this motherfucker has to take a fucking flight to go somewhere. Can't they just use anywhere doors? What's the meaning to their lives? They can't know the future. How do they make decisions? Got to know the future, how do they make decisions, etc.
English
1
0
1
120
Ayush Goyal
Ayush Goyal@goyalayus·
I'll try to finish this in one go but lets see
Ayush Goyal tweet media
English
0
0
1
67