Julian Price

@ConsPost I have written to my MP @pippaheylings as per the attached.

Revealed: No10 aide Morgan McSweeney had two MORE mobile phones which could contain messages about Mandelson's appointment as US ambassador trib.al/5ytKANT

Britain has become a circus. Pride flags, trans flags, Hezbollah flags. ISIS flags. Hamas flags. All at once.

Labour’s Chagos surrender threatens our national interest. Iran, China & Russia all back it, as does the EU. Hard-pressed British taxpayers are due to pay £35bn for this Chagos Surrender on top of the billions more Starmer now wants to handover to the EU. telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/03/2…

'It's the definition of insanity!' Spokesperson for Friends of British Overseas Territories, Robert Midgley, slams the Chagos deal as 'insanity'.

@johnredwood Your lordship writes as if it's a done deal, whereas it most certainly isn't. This dreadful deal has not been ratified and must not be ratified.

The UK has protected the marine environment of Chagos. If we give the islands away we read the EU may then plunder their waters for fish . Why does the government want to do this harm? And why give away so much fish in our home waters in the EU re set?

It is quite clear now that Starmer is China’s stooge, whether he does their bidding voluntarily or because he is hopelessly compromised it’s clear he’s jumping to Beijings tune. China buys between 80-90% of Irans oil, and while Iran isn’t the biggest supplier of oil to China, it does play an important part in China’s energy security strategy. China therefore does not want the pro-China Iranian government to fall, so it instructs its stooges around the world to protect Iranian interests. Hence Starmer’s otherwise inexplainable decision, despite overwhelming evidence from his own security services, not to outlaw Iran’s state terrorist organisation, the Islamic Republican Guard Corps (IRGC).

"surrender of an island chain Britain could quite easily have held on to indefinitely" No. Not "could". Correction: "can" or "should" - and in the present tense. The deal has not yet been ratified and never should be. @Telegraph @RossKempsell @DanielJHannan @GreatBritishPAC

Starmer is undermining British interests on the world stage telegraph.co.uk/opinion/2026/0…

@JChimirie66677 @Blayney20 This is a crisis at the heart of our nation. Pressure should come from all parties for the recall of Parliament over this affair. Using a private phone for work purposes during a period of employment normally wouldn’t be an issue, but this is of national importance.

I will speak more plainly than most Those Brits who peacock as left wing opponents of the far right are among the most disgusting people in humanity The fact that you march alongside the Islamic fundamentalist supporters of the ayatollahs - those who stabbed Salman Rushdie in the eye, who hang gays and butcher women, who fire rockets upon Israeli civilians and funded Hamas, who massacred thousands on the streets of Tehran - makes you champions of the most reactionary forces on earth The fact that our media is captured by idiots like you and thus you are never held to account does not change this You - the most pompous, the most self-aggrandising, the most preachy and hectoring - are the scum of Britain

The Messages Are Not Gone. They Are on Someone Else's Phone. There is a certain kind of political scandal that ends not with a dramatic revelation but with a mundane one. Not a smoking gun but a forgotten detail. Not a conspiracy unravelled but a basic error of logic, sitting in plain sight, waiting for someone to point at it. This is one of those moments. We have spent several weeks being told that Morgan McSweeney's messages are gone. Wiped. Unrecoverable. Lost to a street robbery in Pimlico and a remote deletion that, conveniently, destroyed the tracker along with everything else. Downing Street has leaned heavily on this narrative. The messages cannot be produced because the messages do not exist. The phone is gone. The evidence is gone. Move along. There is a problem with this story. WhatsApp is not a one-way street. When two people exchange messages, those messages exist on both devices. Wiping one phone does not reach through the internet and delete the other. McSweeney's conversations with Lord Mandelson are not only on McSweeney's phone. They are also on Mandelson's phone. His conversations with Jonathan Powell are on Powell's phone. His conversations with Matthew Doyle are on Doyle's phone. The messages Downing Street has declared unrecoverable are, in fact, sitting in the pockets and cloud backups of everyone McSweeney spoke to. Any child with a smartphone could tell you this. And it raises a question so obvious it is remarkable that it has taken this long to ask it loudly: why has nobody in Downing Street been asked to produce their devices? The answer, in Mandelson's case, may already be known to the Metropolitan Police. He was arrested in February on suspicion of misconduct in public office. When you arrest someone on those grounds, you seize their phone. That is standard procedure. It is not optional. If Mandelson's device was taken, as it almost certainly was, then the Metropolitan Police are already in possession of the other end of every conversation Downing Street has spent months telling us is lost. Read that again slowly. The government may have wiped one phone while the police were already holding the other. If that is the case, then the claim that McSweeney's messages are unrecoverable is not an unfortunate consequence of a street robbery. Maintaining that claim in full knowledge of Mandelson's arrest and the likely seizure of his device is not carelessness. It is something considerably more serious. Downing Street has refused to say whether any attempt was made to track the wiped phone. It has refused to explain why the ICO was not notified. It has refused to say whether MI5 or GCHQ were informed. It is now going to have to answer a fourth question, and this one is harder to manage than the others. If the police have Mandelson's phone, where are the messages? "The messages Downing Street has declared unrecoverable are, in fact, sitting in the pockets and cloud backups of everyone McSweeney spoke to."

@NileGardiner Yes, she's clearly certifiably insane, and quite dangerous. Gawd help us unless someone can hatch a plan to bring down these starmerites.

You sound insane

@HillelNeuer @YvetteCooperMP Because Labour, the Greens, "Your Party", and the socialist rabble in the UK goverment cleary side with the China/CCP and Iran/IGRC. No other explanation adds up.

.@YvetteCooperMP Is it true your 🇬🇧 government is planning to quietly go along with the UNHRC's appointment on Tuesday of this open defender of Hamas terror? We urge you to demand a vote, and to vote No. ZEINA JALLAD: “Hamas is a political party. The biggest image: ‘Let's create always a devil. Let's create the biggest elephant in the room. If we have someone that we create as the devil, then it's easy to blame.’ “It's easy to, ‘But they did this.. But they did that...’ Hamas is a political party. They won the elections in 2007. Right?” “Europeans decided to boycott Hamas. The entire world bashed Hamas. Israel imposed a blockade on Gaza... And then, ‘Oh, they are revolting...’ Why we didn't hear about the Gazans all the past 12, 13, 15, 16, 19, 60, 70, 80 and 80 years ago?”

@danielmgmoylan @Keir_Starmer This is beyond ordinary politics now. We're in uncharted constitutional territory now. All decent parliamentarians should now unite to bring down this appalling Labour government and bring them to trail.

A political, diplomatic and ecological disaster entirely due to Sir ⁦@Keir_Starmer⁩ and his friends. EU plot to seize Chagos fishing rights after Starmer’s surrender telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/03/2…

Starmer’s #Chagos deal just gets murkier. Serious questions over conflicts of interest. Bad for the Chagossians, bad for British taxpayers, and bad for Western security. Yet it seems to benefit a select group of Labour and Mauritian figures. dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1…

"Starmer crony's 'secretive' firm pockets £1million from taxpayer after Chagos Islands sell-out" There must be a criminal investigation Personally, I want trials. dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1…

Starmer crony's 'secretive' firm pockets £1million from taxpayer after Chagos Islands sell-out trib.al/WREHL3u

This isn't the ordinary run-of-the-mill politics. It looks increasingly like treason; a CCP takeover: the spy case, the mega-embassy, Chagos, with net zero added to the mix. 🇺🇸 would be right to withhold intelligence from 🇬🇧 UK party leaders must now unite to remove Labour. @KemiBadenoch @Nigel_Farage @WilliamClouston @EdwardJDavey @RupertLowe10 @GRobinsonDUP.

Exclusive: Jonathan Powell, the National Security Advisor, has been accused of being “rewarded” for the role he and his private organisation played in the Chagos surrender deal, and a US official has warned that America is “considering withholding classified information” over Powell’s links to China. (Link below)

Chagos. How long do you think this has been cooking..? “The European Union has been accused of seeking to exploit Sir Keir Starmer’s Chagos Islands surrender by securing fishing rights in the waters of the British territory. Brussels believes the Prime Minister’s plan to transfer sovereignty “could further increase the relevance” of its existing fishing agreement with Mauritius by opening swathes of ocean around the Chagos Islands to French and Spanish vessels. A report from the European Commission, seen by The Telegraph, reveals it is watching Britain’s Chagos deal with great interest. The document, published this month, says the deal could open the door to fishing licences in a major boost to European-owned trawlers. It has raised concerns among conservationists that European trawlers will exploit fish stocks in the 640,000 sq km area surrounding the Chagos archipelago, one of the planet’s largest Marine Protected Areas (MPA), which has been under a Britain-enforced “no take zone” since 2010. The EU fleet already uses fishing licences in the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius to target Indian Ocean species such as yellowfin tuna. Indian Ocean tuna is worth more than £6bn a year. The EU has previously been accused of exploiting fishing grounds off the west African coast, including in the waters of Mauritania, Senegal, Sierra Leone & Ghana. Priti Patel, the shadow foreign secretary… “Sir Keir Starmer’s outrageous Chagos surrender runs directly against Britain’s national interest. That’s why Iran, China and Russia all support it. And now Brussels is set to benefit too. “Not only does this surrender undermine our security and defence at a time of rising global tensions, it also opens the door to EU trawlers wrecking the protected waters around the Chagos Islands. “Having already sold out British fishermen to the EU, now Labour are selling out our sovereign territory and waters too” Telegraph