Ijas Abdulla

A founder watched a worse competitor eat his market for two years. Worse work. Fewer reviews. Higher prices. The competitor's only advantage? They were the top 3 results on Google and the name ChatGPT spat out when anyone asked. Quality lost to visibility. It happens every single day, in every city, in every industry. The best business in town stays invisible while the loudest one online takes the calls. Being good is table stakes. Being found is the multiplier. A great business nobody can find grows by referral and luck. A great business that is findable grows on purpose. rankday closes the visibility gap in 90 days, top 3 Google plus AI citations, one price, guaranteed, so the best business actually wins. Who is the worse competitor winning on visibility in your market? You do not have to name them. Just tell me how much it stings, 1 to 10.

People ask what if rankday does not deliver. Fair. Here is exactly what happens. Week 1, we agree your target keywords and put the scope in writing. No moving goalposts. Day 90, we measure. If you are top 3 for 90% of the agreed list, done. If you are not, we keep working at no extra charge until you are. In parallel, we track AI citations weekly. The target is your business showing up in AI answers for at least 5 high intent queries in your category within 90 days. That is not "we will try." That is a written commitment with a clock and a consequence. The only thing fixed before we start is the scope, so neither side plays games with definitions. What is the one thing you would need to see in writing before you trusted an agency again? I will tell you if we already do it.

In 24 months, "where do I find a good X" will be answered by AI more often than by a list of blue links. That is not a prediction. It is already happening in your category. Google AI Overviews sit above the results. ChatGPT and Perplexity hand out direct recommendations. Buyers are getting one answer instead of ten options. When the front door becomes a single answer, being on page one is not enough. You have to be the answer. That is why AEO exists, and why rankday treats AI citations as core and not a bonus. We get you cited by ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Google AI and Gemini in the same 90 days we rank you on Google. The businesses that move now own the answer. The ones who wait inherit whatever is left. Are you building for blue links or for the answer? Tell me where your category is headed.

You think you know what your customers search for. You are usually wrong. Owners describe their service in industry language. Buyers search in panic language, problem language, and near me language. The gap between those two vocabularies is where rankings are won and lost. A clinic thinks aesthetic dermatology services. The patient types why won't my acne go away plus city. A law firm thinks commercial litigation. The client types supplier won't pay me what do I do. rankday targets the words your buyers actually type, agreed with you in week 1 and fixed in writing, then guarantees top 3 for 90% of them in 90 days or we keep working free. What is a phrase you know your customers say but that sounds nothing like how your industry describes it? Best one gets a reply.

Hiring an in house SEO person. 12 to 18k a month salary, 3 to 6 months to ramp, and you still need a developer, a designer and a content writer around them. That is well over six figures a year before anyone ranks for anything. Or, one rankday engagement. Fixed price, 4,900 or 7,900. 90 days. Rebuilt site, branding, top 3 rankings, AI citations, guaranteed or we keep working free. A whole team's output, none of the headcount. In house makes sense when search is your core product. For almost everyone else it is a very expensive way to get one part of the job done slowly. Hire a person, or buy the outcome? Tell me which way you would go and why. I will push back on the popular answer.

To the founder who knows the website is a problem but has 400 other fires. I see you. Payroll, clients, ops, and a website you keep meaning to get around to. SEO feels like one more project that needs meetings, decisions and vocabulary you do not have time to learn. So here is the version that respects your time. You do not manage anything. You do not learn schema, AEO or llms.txt. You approve the keywords and the site once, in week 1. Then you answer two short questions a week. 90 days later, new site, top 3 rankings, AI citations. Done. One price. Guaranteed. The whole product is designed around the fact that you do not have time. That is the feature. Founders, how many "I will get around to it" projects are on your list right now? Drop the number. No judgment.

Just post more content is the most overprescribed, least effective SEO advice on the internet. You do not have a content volume problem. You have a foundation problem. Pumping 40 blog posts onto a site that is slow, badly structured and invisible to AI is like adding floors to a house with no foundation. It does not rank. It does not get cited. It just sits there as proof you did SEO. The right order. Rebuild the foundation, structure for Google and for LLM citation, then earn rankings, reviews and links. Content serves the structure, not the other way around. That is the rankday sequence. 90 days. One price. Top 3 plus AI citations, guaranteed. What is the worst SEO advice you ever paid for? I will go first. "Just blog more." Your turn.

I am onboarding 2 more customers for @hellorankday on $5K per month. Either local business or a SaaS just starting out We will build your website, I will personally do the positioning exercise for you. build backlinks, do outreach and learn a lot along the way. DMs are open

Buyers are asking ChatGPT which tool to use before they ever visit your site. And stats prove llm’s convert at a ridiculously high rate than any other media it answers with whatever it can read about you: - your product pages - your docs - the comparisons you've published so if your product is locked behind a "book a demo" button, it has nothing to pull it can't explain what it can't read so it explains your competitor instead and recommends them by name the buyer never reaches your site, and you lose a deal you didn't know you were in the brands winning right now make their whole product understandable from public pages alone we are eating our own dogfood and started ranking for llm’s two weeks back @hellorankday In 90 days or less, by the time a buyer reached the site, the only question left was how to start if people can't understand your product without talking to you, the AI already wrote you out of the answer Check out our free tools on the website. Link in bio

This is fucked up on so many levels. Since Oct 10th, $70 BILLION in crypto leveraged positions has been liquidated. Where did it go? Straight to insiders, MMs, and exchanges. Think about this: Total Altcoin MCap is sitting at $168B today. If that $70B of wiped-out capital went into these spot assets instead, alts would be significantly higher. The obsession with gambling on memecoins and high-leverage futures trading to get rich overnight has completely ruined retail investing. Please HOLD IN SPOT and stop destroying your portfolio with leverage

Cardano investors deserve answers. I've hired a crypto forensics firm to investigate the history of Cardano's founding, its original ICO proceeds, the movement of the BTC raised, and the financial history of the founding entities. I'm looking for information on: • The original ICO BTC addresses and where those funds ultimately went • The formation and ownership history of the founding entities, including Input Output (IOG/IOHK), Emurgo, and the Cardano Foundation • Salary, bonus, dividend, and other compensation paid by these entities over time • Any public or private disclosures regarding treasury management, BTC sales, ADA sales, or distributions to owners and insiders • Historical corporate records, annual reports, audits, board minutes, presentations, or other relevant documents I'm not alleging wrongdoing. In fact, the answer may be entirely reasonable. But Cardano raised what would be worth billions of dollars today, and I think the community deserves a complete accounting of what happened to those assets and how the ecosystem was funded over time. If you have documents, research, leads, archived websites, old forum posts, wallet information, or firsthand knowledge, please reach out. I'd like to build the most complete historical record possible.

@denohawari Llm

We just ranked a B2C SaaS brand inside ChatGPT. - $620K in revenue • 845% traffic growth • All in 9 months This is the biggest SEO opportunity since Google, and no one’s talking about it. Buyers are rapidly moving to AI search platforms. If you're not ranking in ChatGPT and Claude, your competitors are stealing your clicks. I documented our entire process: - How we turned 185 daily clicks into 1,750+ without touching paid ads - Step-by-step breakdown of how we structure pages for both humans and search engines - The internal linking system that quietly boosts rankings across your entire site - The “non-branded domination” strategy that captures buyers before they know you exist - The exact optimization layer that gets your brand cited inside tools like ChatGPT - How to build topical authority without spamming 100 random blog posts This is the only guide you need to unlock LLM SEO for your brand. Want the full playbook? 1. Like + follow 2. Comment “LLM” I’ll send it to you

@polsia raised $30M at a $250M valuation. And it’s a one person company + AI And now @Bencera wants to help other’s do the same. In his own way. Man pasted old school posters across SF 😅 One Founder + AI. Zero employees. Would you choose this path if you had 30 Million? Closely watching this one

If one company can report fake revenue of 15 lakh crore, imagine calculating India's entire GDP.

Drop your website link below and I will tell you the number one reason it is not ranking. I am serious. Comment your URL and I will reply with the single biggest thing holding it back, structure, content, speed, or AI readability. Free. No pitch. Most sites have one dominant problem doing 80% of the damage. Finding it is the easy part. Fixing all of them in 90 days with a guarantee is the @hellorankday part. We also built free tools you can run yourself right now. Website SEO Audit, Store SEO Audit, AEO Check, and an llms.txt generator. Comment AUDIT and I will send the set. Two ways to play this. Drop your link for a manual read, or comment AUDIT for the free tools. Either way you leave knowing more than you do now.

Who is building AI Dev tools?

Buying Bitcoin today is front running the forced diversification of a completely AI saturated equity market. With not one, not two, but three massive inclusion of 5 Trillion dollars of equity value into the index, diversification requires venturing out on the risk curve.

Here is a deal almost no agency will offer you, and the fact that they will not tells you everything. "We will agree your target keywords in writing. If you are not top 3 for 90% of them in 90 days, we keep working for free until you are." Ask any agency you are considering to sign that. Watch them squirm. They will say rankings are not guaranteed, the algorithm changes, results vary. All technically true. All also the perfect shield for never being accountable to an outcome. We offer that exact deal because we built the system to deliver it. Risk on us. Fixed price. 90 days. Top 3 plus AI citations. When a business is confident in its work, it puts the outcome in writing. When it is not, it sells you effort. Which would you rather buy, effort or outcomes? And which is your current agency actually selling?

The move back to 78-79 will happen FAST

@neerajjj6785 Leave the country

My friend got 2 offers Google 54 LPA - Pune Rubrik 65 LPA - Bangalore Which one should he choose?