Nehemiah Jesse

@EnosQi1 If u have trouble kukumbuka teams zinachomanga,, strategies gani apply to which league Unaweza try this tool I've built,it will help you track and improve overtime SlipKitchen.vercel.app

WhatsApp Business Agent for SMEs. WhatsApp + M-Pesa + Google Sheets. Responds to your customers 24/7 even when you are a sleep. No more scattered data. Makes sales, collects customer info, completes payment + stores data and sends receipts. See it in action.

And guys this is why crypto fails 😂😂😂

Here's YC's official advice about being truthful and precise about what is pilot, bookings, revenue and recurring revenue. Founders, particularly first time founders, need to sear this into their brains. Don't mistake one tier for another. Be precise, and always be truthful.

A mathematician who shared an office with Claude Shannon at Bell Labs gave one lecture in 1986 that explains why some people win Nobel Prizes and other equally smart people spend their whole lives doing forgettable work. His name was Richard Hamming. He won the Turing Award. He invented error-correcting codes that made modern computing possible. And he spent 30 years at Bell Labs sitting in a cafeteria at lunch watching which scientists became legendary and which ones faded into nothing. In March 1986, he walked into a Bellcore auditorium in front of 200 researchers and told them exactly what he had seen. Here's the framework that has been quoted by every serious scientist for the last 40 years. His opening line landed like a punch. He said most scientists he worked with at Bell Labs were just as smart as the Nobel Prize winners. Just as hardworking. Just as credentialed. And yet at the end of a 40-year career, one group had changed entire fields and the other group was forgotten by the time they retired. He wanted to know what the difference actually was. And he said it wasn't luck. It wasn't IQ. It was a specific set of habits that almost nobody is willing to follow. The first habit was the one that hurts the most to hear. He said most scientists deliberately avoid the most important problem in their field because the odds of failure are too high. They pick a safe adjacent problem, solve it cleanly, publish it, and move on. And because they never swing at the hard problem, they never hit it. He said if you do not work on an important problem, it is unlikely you will do important work. That is not a motivational line. That is a logical one. The second habit was about doors. Literal doors. He noticed that the scientists at Bell Labs who kept their office doors closed got more done in the short term because they had no interruptions. But the scientists who kept their doors open got more done over a career. The open-door scientists were interrupted constantly. They also absorbed every new idea passing through the hallway. Ten years in, they were working on problems the closed-door scientists did not even know existed. The third habit was inversion. When Bell Labs refused to give him the team of programmers he wanted, Hamming sat with the rejection for weeks. Then he flipped the question. Instead of asking for programmers to write the programs, he asked why machines could not write the programs themselves. That single inversion pushed him into the frontier of computer science. He said the pattern repeats everywhere. What looks like a defect, if you flip it correctly, becomes the exact thing that pushes you ahead of everyone else. The fourth habit was the one that hit me the hardest. He said knowledge and productivity compound like interest. Someone who works 10 percent harder than you does not produce 10 percent more over a career. They produce twice as much. The gap doesn't add. It multiplies. And it compounds silently for years before anyone notices. He finished the lecture with a line I have never been able to shake. He said Pasteur's famous quote is right. Luck favors the prepared mind. But he meant it literally. You don't hope for luck. You engineer the conditions where luck can land on you. Open doors. Important problems. Inverted questions. Compounded hours. Those are not traits. Those are choices you make every single day. The transcript has been sitting on the University of Virginia's computer science website for almost 30 years. The video is free on YouTube. Stripe Press reprinted the full lectures as a book in 2020 and Bret Victor wrote the foreword. Hamming died in 1998. He gave his final lecture a few weeks before. He was 82. The lecture that explains why some careers become legendary and others disappear is still free. Most people who could benefit from it will never open it.

Lol. According to the Bible, the "word of God" is either the messages from God independent of the medium or Jesus. Scripture as text is never once referred to as the "word of God" in the Bible & nothing called "the Bible" existed when the texts of the Bible were being written.

I Saw this. And created this

A great example of reading the Bible in context vs cherry picking And this is why I LOVE Alex o Connor😅💯❤️

Religion Is a Dark age superstition and should be considered for what it is.

Ricky gervais 🗣️ The way he explains atheism is just down right beautiful

An epic "Ride Through The MCU” tribute. 🔥 (via @GuggaLeunnam)

Villain shit from Palantir people 15. The postwar neutering of Germany and Japan must be undone. The defanging of Germany was an overcorrection for which Europe is now paying a heavy price.

The limits of soft power, of soaring rhetoric alone, have been exposed. The ability of free and democratic societies to prevail requires something more than moral appeal. It requires hard power, and hard power in this century will be built on software Villain shit from Palantir

Building a data-driven recruitment engine for football is about spatial intelligence. I’ve been developing a tactical system that uses Go and Three.js to turn raw match data into 3D tactical insights. github.com/nutcas3/tactic… #SportsTech #Golang #DataScience #FootballAnalytics

Kenyan engineer Joseph Nguthiru turns water hyacinth into biodegradable plastic, reducing mosquito breeding grounds, cutting plastic waste, and creating green jobs for the community.

AI couldn't edit this

I'm Bryan, and this is some of my art.

A lab at Michigan put people in a brain scanner, burned their arms with a hot probe, and then showed them photos of their ex. The scans came back almost identical, an 88% match. That was 40 people who'd all been through breakups they didn't want, and it proved what anyone who's been left already knows in their body: the pain is physical. Your brain runs heartbreak through the same wiring it uses for a burn. The tweet says "you have to stop liking them," like there is a switch somewhere you flip and it stops. There isn't one. Helen Fisher, a biological anthropologist at Rutgers, scanned 15 people who'd recently been dumped. Two months later, every one of them was still spending over 85% of their waking hours thinking about the person who left. When Fisher showed them a photo of whoever dumped them, the part of the brain that produces dopamine (your "I want more of this" chemical) and the craving center both fired. Same circuits as cocaine. Fisher calls what happens next "frustration attraction." When your brain expects a reward and the reward gets yanked away, dopamine doesn't calm down. It spikes. Same wiring that makes a gambler throw more money at a losing hand makes a heartbroken person obsess harder. Evolution did this on purpose. Losing a mate meant your genes died with you, so the brain learned to cling harder when it should have been letting go. Fisher's argument: love is a drive, not a feeling. Same category as hunger and thirst, right next door in the brain. You can't talk yourself out of being hungry. You can white-knuckle it, but the craving doesn't leave because you told it to. After a breakup, cortisol (your body's alarm bell) floods in and can stay high for months. Serotonin, which keeps your mood stable and stops your thoughts from looping, drops. An Italian study in the late '90s found that people who were madly in love had serotonin levels that looked like people with OCD. When someone loves you back, that obsession reads as devotion. When they don't, it is a loop you can't think your way out of. Researchers at the University of Kentucky found that taking Tylenol every day for three weeks made people feel less social pain. Brain scans backed it up. The same pill that fixes a headache can take the edge off a breakup, because your brain runs both kinds of pain through the same hardware. Full recovery takes about 18 to 24 months, going by Fisher's numbers. That is how long the dopamine system needs to stop searching for someone who is gone and to build a new version of normal without them in it. You don't "decide" to get over someone the way you decide to quit a job or sell a car. You sit there and wait for a chemical withdrawal to run its course while your own brain fights you, keeps firing, keeps reaching for a fix that is not coming. And when the weight lifts one day and you go a whole afternoon without thinking about them, that is just chemistry. A very old, very blind piece of biological machinery, finally running out of fuel.