@RoriMclaren@edpwatch_ Answer the question. It’s basically a drawing done by artificial intelligence. It’s not harming an actual child. Is it wrong? I’m trying to make a point. Is Ai cp wrong because it’s not hurting an actual child? Yes or no.
@jadinalaina@edpwatch_ who said anything about ai cp? ive only been talking about drawings and fiction in anime/manga you are the one saying fiction = reality funny how you move the goal post when it doesnt go your way
@pr4chan_user@edpwatch_ So being a pedo is completely fine if you don’t act out on your fantasies and instead just draw pictures of children instead? It’s still wrong and weird. And I’m sorry, I don’t know what ntr doujin is, so i can’t answer that question.
@jadinalaina@edpwatch_ that brings up another question, is a latent criminal a criminal?
ppl have fantasies that they don’t actually desire to realize, the whole point is that it’s a fantasy
let’s say a person likes ntr doujin, does that automatically translate to wanting to cuck or be cucked?
@yuritismpilled@1_Cofiz_1@Yuzuru_mp3@edpwatch_@grok I never said children can consent. When did those words come out of my mouth? You’re so sick trying to project your pedophillic ideaologies onto me. YOU are the one jerking it to character depictions of children.
@jadinalaina@1_Cofiz_1@Yuzuru_mp3@edpwatch_@grok You're fucking slow, no victims are involved in drawings, you're the one wanting to force that relation by comparing it to drawings and refusing to stop using a term made to imply children can consent.
@yuritismpilled@1_Cofiz_1@Yuzuru_mp3@edpwatch_@grok Being sexually attracted to the character depictions of prepubescent children is still weird. So according to you making ai cp is completely fine bc no real child is being harmed.
@RoriMclaren@edpwatch_ So this isn’t my logic at all, and you’re just confused. I said it is wrong and pedoohiliic behavior to be sexually attracted to character depictions of children. According to YOUR logic, making ai cp is okay because it’s online and not real.
@jadinalaina@edpwatch_ ok so applying exactly the same logic if a fictional character looks real therefore crime, then literally killing a character in GTA,cod or BF would make you a murderer since they look like real people and you killed them = murderer you better not be switching your logic now
@yuritismpilled@1_Cofiz_1@Yuzuru_mp3@edpwatch_@grok I am very sorry for the victims of cp, but that doesn’t change the terminology. We have words for a reason. You’re disrespecting the victims by being sexually attracted to drawings of cp.
@yuritismpilled@1_Cofiz_1@Yuzuru_mp3@edpwatch_@grok Because loli is defined as female characters depicted as prepubescent, young, and with childlike features. You’re the one that is sexually attracted to it.
@pr4chan_user@edpwatch_ Art is a reflection of the internal mind. When someone draws depictions of children in sexualizing manors, that is a reflection of their internal mindset and desires.
@jadinalaina@edpwatch_ sure call it weird but never excuse for censorship, art is drawn at the end of the day and shouldn’t be excuse for censorship, censorship is always going to lead to mass surveillance, i also hope u see that
@jadinalaina@edpwatch_ ok lets entertain your stupidity, so you say someone is a pedo bc they like a "fictional character that looks like a child" bc there is no diference between the drawing and a real child therefore that makes someone a pedo. right?
@jadinalaina@1_Cofiz_1@Yuzuru_mp3@edpwatch_@grok You're the one seeing children??? These are completely fictional proportions no children have? Unless you have a mental disease that makes you think children have the proportions of purposefuly view appealing drawings.
@pr4chan_user@edpwatch_ Oh no! I misspelled a word in a comment section on X! What should I do? I’m actually getting my doctorate, so idrc what you have to say 🤷♀️🤷♀️
@pr4chan_user@edpwatch_ A child character can def be likable! But they shouldn’t be sexualized. I watch anime, and I understand that you can lik a character or even find them attractive. But being sexually attracted to child characters and making art sexualizing them is weird. I hope we can agree.
@jadinalaina@edpwatch_ no u card uhuh
anyways liking a character is liking a character, i don’t particularly like them cuz they look like loli i like them as the character they r but ur rotten brain cant comprehend that lol, and just think ab ur argument for a sec, a child character cant be like-able?
@jadinalaina@edpwatch_ bro doesnt know how to read it literally saids "young looking" " prepubesent APPEARING female" that doesnt mean they are just that they look like doesnt mean they are, even says "in anime and manga they are DESIGN to look cute" thanks for probing me right 😂
@RoriMclaren@edpwatch_ You know what’s also young and petite? Children. You’re the one that is attracted to them and their attributes. YOU are telling on yourself.
@jadinalaina@edpwatch_ of a petite young looking character not a child if you see a drawing of a character and you think its a real sexualized child brother thats just you self reporting 😬
@achthenuts@edpwatch_ Was this going to prove something? The characters that are “1000 years old” still have the attributes of children, and you’re the one that is sexually attracted to this. And the other side of the spectrum is also wrong because it sexualizes children by making them children.
@jadinalaina@1_Cofiz_1@Yuzuru_mp3@edpwatch_@grok Why do you keep using a fake term for pedophiles to justify their mental disorder, you're literally helping them by using it because it implies children can consent, disgusting from you. And stop projecting what you find attractive in children since no anime character has that.