Josh R

22.8K posts

Josh R banner
Josh R

Josh R

@jjroach3

Software Executive, Reader, Composer, Traveler, History Buff, anti-communist, anti-fascist, former GOP, principled conservative, supporter of Ukraine.🇺🇸🇺🇦

USA เข้าร่วม Mayıs 2010
1.9K กำลังติดตาม1.7K ผู้ติดตาม
ทวีตที่ปักหมุด
Josh R
Josh R@jjroach3·
Donald Trump Is Not a Conservative. He’s a Warning. By a lifelong Republican who still believes in conservative principles. It’s time to say out loud what many on the right whisper privately, and what is going to be increasingly made public: Donald Trump is not a conservative. Not in philosophy, not in temperament, not in governing style, and certainly not in respect for the institutions that conservatives have spent generations trying to preserve. Trumpism isn’t the future of conservatism—it’s its undoing. Conservatism Once Meant Something. Trump Burned It Down. Real conservatism champions limited government, personal responsibility, fiscal discipline, and reverence for the constitutional structure that restrains human ambition. It values rule of law over rule of man. It elevates character and humility, not chaos and ego. Trump embodies none of that. Instead, he has offered a politics of resentment, centralization of power, and a cult of personality so intense that many Republicans now treat the presidency as a throne rather than a constitutional office. This isn’t the legacy of Goldwater or Reagan. It’s the legacy of leaders conservatives once warned the nation about. A Man Who Worships Power Cannot Be a Conservative The first principle of conservatism is that power must be restrained, because human nature is flawed. Trump’s first principle is that power should be accumulated, because he believes he alone is virtuous. Conservatives fought for decades to limit presidential overreach. Trump smashed those boundaries with the zeal of someone who had never read a page of The Federalist Papers but is certain he understood them better than the authors. He threatened to use the DOJ against political enemies, demanded personal loyalty from public servants, attacked judges whose rulings he disliked, and treated independent institutions as his personal subsidiaries. That is not conservatism. That is authoritarian instinct—plain and simple. A Fiscal Conservative? Don’t Make Me Laugh. Trump exploded the deficit in times of economic expansion—something no conservative president had ever done. He signed every bloated spending bill that crossed his desk, raised tariffs (a hidden tax on consumers), and showed zero interest in entitlement reform or long-term financial stewardship. Conservatives used to talk about debt as a moral issue. Trump treated it like Monopoly money. Trade Protectionism Is Not Conservative Economics For decades, conservatives fought for free markets, open competition, and lower barriers to global commerce. Trump shattered that consensus with old-school economic nationalism dressed up as populist bravado. His tariffs punished American consumers and businesses more than foreign adversaries. Reagan said, “Protectionism is destructionism.” Trump called tariffs “beautiful.” One of them was a conservative. The other was Donald Trump. Character Still Counts—No Matter What Excuses His Followers Make Conservatism is a worldview rooted in virtue. Burke wrote about the necessity of ordered liberty supported by personal restraint. Buckley demanded decency and seriousness from the conservative movement. Reagan modeled optimism, humility, humor, and faith in America. Trump modeled none of these. He brought pettiness, cruelty, and narcissism into the center of the Republican identity. For too many, character no longer mattered as long as the leader punched the right enemies. That shift alone disqualifies Trump from being called a conservative—because it erases the moral foundation of the movement. He Has Contempt for the Constitution He Swore to Defend Conservatives revere the Constitution because it restrains the passions of the moment. Trump sees the Constitution as an inconvenient rulebook that keeps him from doing whatever he wants. He floated ideas like “terminating” parts of it after the 2020 election—a statement that should have permanently disqualified him from conservative life. He showed open disdain for federalism, attacked state leaders who disagreed with him, and repeatedly praised strongmen abroad whose power he envied. No one who speaks like that should ever again be called a conservative. Trump Isn’t a Philosophy—He’s an Erosion At its core, conservatism is about preserving the things that keep a nation strong: its institutions, its norms, its fiscal health, its civic virtue, and its constitutional order. Trump undermined every one of them. The real danger isn’t just Trump himself. It’s the precedent he sets: that a president can ignore norms, pressure institutions, centralize power, and shred the guardrails of democracy—all while claiming to be the guardian of “real America.” If conservatives allow that to stand, the movement won’t survive. The authoritarian left won’t destroy conservatism—Trumpism will. Conservatives Must Choose: Trump or Conservatism Those of us who still believe in conservative principles face a choice, and it’s not complicated: We can defend the Constitution, or we can defend Trump. We can stand for limited government, or we can stand for unlimited executive ego. We can preserve the conservative movement, or we can watch it mutate into a populist personality cult. But we cannot pretend that both visions are conservative. One is rooted in centuries of wisdom about human nature and the fragility of self-government. The other is rooted in the impulses of a single man. Trump is not a conservative. He never was. He is the loudest alarm bell the right has heard in generations—and if conservatives ignore it, we may never again recognize the movement we once believed in.
English
23
26
70
3.6K
Josh R รีทวีตแล้ว
Iran International English
An Israeli security insider says “it’s a matter of weeks” as the US and Israel help create conditions for Iranians to safely rise up against the Islamic Republic. Watch the full interview youtube.com/watch?v=mKegFv…
YouTube video
YouTube
English
6
78
240
14.7K
Josh R
Josh R@jjroach3·
@WW3finalboss Wow. Is this actually possible? Do the brave Ukrainians have the momentum to achieve this?
English
0
0
1
599
WW3finalboss
WW3finalboss@WW3finalboss·
🇺🇦⚔️ Russia Bleeds in Zaporizhzhia Russian forces are taking heavy losses, with major setbacks reported across the Zaporizhzhia region. Pressure is mounting along a critical axis. And the situation is starting to shift. It seems the land bridge is on the verge of being cut. If that happens, everything changes.
WW3finalboss tweet media
English
44
258
1.4K
47.3K
Josh R
Josh R@jjroach3·
History will judge Trump harshly, and the area he’ll be judged the harshest will be his blatant and treasonous embrace of Russia over Ukraine and our allies. It doesn’t matter whether the Russians have compromising material on him, or he just admires evil dictators, or wants to do Trump family “business deals” in the future with Russian oligarchs - he has acted treasonously by siding with Russia, our mortal enemy number one (followed by Iran).
English
1
3
10
186
Josh R รีทวีตแล้ว
Michael Weiss
Michael Weiss@michaeldweiss·
Remember: Dmitriev is now attacking Europe for not participating in a war against Iran, which the Kremlin not only opposes but is indirectly helping Tehran wage. And he is the one offering to stop Russia's participation in exchange for America rescinding its intelligence support to Ukraine. His desperation to channel MAGA has led him into ridiculous cul-de-sacs. All of which are amply on display to his enemies in Russia.
English
4
37
145
6.4K
Michael Weiss
Michael Weiss@michaeldweiss·
"Two people familiar with the U.S.-Russia negotiations said that such a proposal was made by Russian envoy Kirill Dmitriev to Trump administration envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner during their meeting last week in Miami. The U.S. rejected the proposal, the people added." The CIA prizes its cooperation with Ukraine in ways seldom appreciated in news coverage about the war. The relationship, built up steadily over the last twelve years and initiated by former HUR director Valery Kondratyuk and implemented on the ground by Kyiv Station, has only deepened and expanded under the current administration. That may seem paradoxical given Trump's fondness for Russia and Putin, but it remains true nonetheless. One very obvious reason for the relationship's endurance and growth is that while the CIA provides Ukraine with targeting packages both in the occupied territories of Ukraine and inside Russia itself, the Ukrainians are providing the CIA with invaluable intelligence about Russia at all levels: military, economic and political. Kirill Dmitriev appears to be making good on his reputation as someone who thinks himself smarter and more important than he actually is. (His greatest assets is his wife, who's besties with Putin's daughter.) His hubris is leading him to fashion a rod for his own back. Dmitriev just managed to do three things at once: First, confirm the U.S. intelligence that Russia is indeed trying to get American servicemen killed in the Middle East, something Putin and Ushakov denied to Trump and Witkoff. Second, offer to knock it off in exchange for cancelling the one non-negotiable thing U.S. intelligence values above all in its relationship with Ukraine. Third, give the "war party" something new to use against him, since now he's bartering with their stock-in-trade, taking the fight to the main adversary. What's worse: he didn't even cut a deal. politico.eu/article/putin-…
English
15
164
393
20.9K
Josh R รีทวีตแล้ว
Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡
JUST IN: The country that learned to shoot down Iranian drones over Kyiv is now teaching the Gulf to shoot them down over refineries. Nobody asked Trump. The Gulf asked Ukraine. President Zelensky confirmed at the UK Parliament on March 18 that 201 Ukrainian military specialists are already deployed across UAE, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia, with teams en route to Kuwait and 34 more ready to go. These are active-duty government military personnel, not private contractors. They are sharing combat-proven expertise from three years of intercepting Iranian Shahed drones over Ukrainian cities, power grids, and civilian infrastructure. The Gulf states requested the assistance. Saudi Arabia explicitly approached Ukraine. The arrangement is reciprocal: Ukraine provides the expertise that no other country possesses at this depth of operational experience, and the Gulf provides what Ukraine needs most, funding, technology, and air defence systems. Zelensky specifically highlighted Patriot missiles as part of the exchange. The country that cannot get enough Patriots from the West is earning them from the Gulf by teaching drone interception. Trump did not request this deployment. No reporting in any outlet, from Reuters to Al Jazeera to the Kyiv Post, indicates American coordination or approval. The recent Trump-Zelensky tensions over aid disputes and public friction are well documented. This is not a Washington-orchestrated move. It is a bilateral arrangement between Ukraine and Gulf capitals that bypasses Washington entirely. Zelensky built a parallel channel to the Gulf that gives Ukraine what America has been reluctant to provide while giving the Gulf what America’s $23.5 billion arms surge does not include: the people who know how to fight Shaheds because they have been fighting them every night for three years. The expertise is specific and irreplaceable. Ukraine has intercepted thousands of Shahed-136 and Shahed-238 drones since 2022. It has developed detection protocols, jamming techniques, acoustic tracking, small-arms interception methods, and integrated air defence coordination that no training manual teaches. The Gulf states purchased Patriot batteries, THAAD radars, and anti-drone systems through the $23.5 billion arms package. The hardware is American. The operational knowledge of how to use it against the exact Iranian drone variants now striking Gulf refineries is Ukrainian. Israel views this positively. Anything that strengthens Gulf air defences against Iranian drones reduces the threat environment for every country in the region, including Israel. Ukrainian-Gulf cooperation reinforces the anti-Iran alignment that the Abraham Accords established. Israel and Ukraine share a common adversary’s weapons system: Iran builds the Shaheds, Russia deploys them against Ukraine, and the IRGC deploys them against the Gulf. The expertise flows in one direction. The threat originates from the same factory. The Putin dimension is real but secondary. Iran supplies Russia with Shahed drones for use against Ukraine. Ukraine now teaches Gulf states to destroy those same drones when Iran uses them directly. The feedback loop is elegant: every Ukrainian lesson learned from shooting down Russian-deployed Shaheds over Odesa is now applied to IRGC-deployed Shaheds over Ras Laffan. Putin’s Iranian drone supplier is being countered by the country Putin is fighting, on a battlefield 4,000 kilometres from the front line. The irony is structural. The aggravation is intentional. Two hundred and one experts. Government military, not contractors. Gulf-requested, not Trump-directed. Shahed-specific, not generic. And the country with the most relevant expertise on Earth got there before the $23.5 billion in hardware arrived. open.substack.com/pub/shanakaans…
Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡ tweet media
Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡@shanaka86

JUST IN: Ukraine just deployed anti-drone soldiers to Qatar, the UAE, and Saudi Arabia. The country Russia has been bombing with Iranian Shahed drones for three years is now defending Gulf states from the same Iranian Shahed drones. Read that sentence until the full geometry of this war becomes visible. Zelensky announced on 10th March that Ukrainian military teams equipped with low-cost interceptor drones and electronic warfare systems have arrived in all three Gulf states this week, with a separate team deployed to Jordan for US base protection. The deployment follows direct requests from Washington and calls from Gulf leaders, including Saudi Crown Prince MBS. The interceptors cost between $1,000 and $2,000 each. A Patriot missile costs $3 to $4 million. An Iron Dome Tamir interceptor costs $50,000 to $100,000. A Shahed drone costs $20,000 to $50,000. Ukraine’s battle-tested ramming drones, some 3D-printed and produced at rates of up to 950 per day, achieve over 60 to 70% kill rates against Shahed swarms at a thousandth of the cost of a Patriot. They are disposable. They are scalable. And they have been tested against the exact weapon system they are now deployed to counter, because Iran designed the Shahed and Russia has been launching them at Ukraine since 2022. No other country on Earth has more operational experience killing Shaheds than Ukraine. No other country can offer that expertise at this price. And no other country needs something from the United States as desperately as Ukraine needs Patriot batteries for its own survival. This is the quid pro quo nobody saw coming. Zelensky is not donating expertise. He is trading it. Ukrainian drone killers for American air defence missiles. Shahed interception capability for Patriot deliveries. The country that cannot defend its own power grid without Western systems is now defending Gulf oil infrastructure with indigenous technology cheaper than anything in the American arsenal. The leverage is extraordinary: Ukraine offers the one capability the Gulf urgently needs, at a cost the Pentagon cannot match, in exchange for the one capability Ukraine urgently needs and only Washington can provide. While the US strips THAAD and Patriot batteries from South Korea and ships them to the Gulf at enormous logistical cost, Ukraine arrives with $1,000 drones in cargo containers. While Ghalibaf mocks American escorts as PlayStation, Ukrainian teams set up electronic warfare jammers on Gulf airfields. While the White House blames a staffer for a deleted post about an escort that never happened, Ukraine delivers the capability the post falsely claimed existed. The Iran war just merged with the Russia war through the one weapon system they share: the Shahed drone. Designed in Iran. Manufactured for Russia. Launched against Ukraine for three years. Now launched against the Gulf. And intercepted in both theatres by the same Ukrainian operators using the same $1,000 technology. Iran built the drone. Russia scaled it. Ukraine learned to kill it. And now Ukraine is selling that knowledge to the countries Iran is attacking, funded by the country Russia is fighting. The circle is complete. The wars are one. Full analysis below. open.substack.com/pub/shanakaans…

English
200
2.2K
6.6K
295.5K
Josh R รีทวีตแล้ว
Institute for the Study of War
MORE: Recent Ukrainian advances in the Oleksandrivka direction and the continued success of Ukraine’s defensive lines in constraining Russian advances have forced the Russian military command into competing tactical and operational dilemmas on the battlefield, which have likely disrupted Russian preparations for their Spring-Summer 2026 offensive. The Russian failure to make even tactical advances to seize favorable starting positions in the Kostyantynivka-Druzhkivka tactical area for the anticipated Spring-Summer 2026 offensive against Ukraine’s Fortress Belt directly undermines Russia’s ability to achieve significant gains in the anticipated offensive.
Institute for the Study of War tweet mediaInstitute for the Study of War tweet mediaInstitute for the Study of War tweet media
Institute for the Study of War@TheStudyofWar

MORE: Ukrainian drone units have been increasingly prioritizing and executing successful strikes against Russian artillery, drone operators and logistics targets in the near rear to achieve tactical effects. ⬇️(1/2) Ukraine’s short-range strike campaign against the Russian tactical near rear is increasingly degrading both Russian offensive and defensive capabilities by enabling Ukrainian forces to make tactical gains and hindering Russia’s ability to conduct artillery preparation for the anticipated Spring-Summer 2026 offensive.

English
1
208
973
87.5K
Josh R รีทวีตแล้ว
Jay in Kyiv
Jay in Kyiv@JayinKyiv·
Outraged Russians now complaining that despite authorities having taken away their internet for "security reasons", Ukrainian drones are still flying freely over their heads, but worse now because no one gets the public warnings that allow them time to get into shelters, and people are dying. The Governor of Belgorod fields messages from Putin's angry and groveling slave population.
English
30
425
1.7K
34.4K
Josh R รีทวีตแล้ว
Michael McFaul
Michael McFaul@McFaul·
Trump won't share the burden with NATO allies of providing economic and military aid to Ukraine in its fight against Russia -- a genuine threat to NATO -- but Trump begs NATO allies to share the burden of his war against Iran. Amazing.
English
155
1.1K
4.8K
60.1K
Josh R รีทวีตแล้ว
New York Post
New York Post@nypost·
Russian blogger Ilya Remeslo who criticized Putin has been put in psychiatric facility trib.al/8tNZr8P
New York Post tweet media
English
111
206
934
45.8K
Josh R
Josh R@jjroach3·
So damn proud of the brave Ukrainians for kicking the shit out of the Russian Orcs on behalf of the entire free world. The VAST majority of Americans support Ukraine over evil Russia and we don’t understand why the traitor Trump continues to prop up Putin. Something is not right with him.
English
1
3
13
156
WW3finalboss
WW3finalboss@WW3finalboss·
🇺🇦🛡️ ZELENSKY’S STARK MESSAGE FROM THE FRONT "We are holding on… Every new day is a new reason not to give up. ...At this stage of the war, it is being decided who will prevail.” Volodymyr Zelensky 🇺🇦 President of Ukraine A leader framing endurance as strategy—and time itself as the battlefield.
WW3finalboss tweet media
English
69
377
1.2K
9.4K
Josh R
Josh R@jjroach3·
Exactly. BOTH Russia and Iran are the enemy. Why does Trump continue to coddle Putin and Russia? Why choose Russia, our mortal enemy for 80 years, over our allies and Ukraine? Russia’s defeat by Ukraine is clearly in US security interests. Russia has something compromising on Trump, there is simply no other explanation.
English
0
1
10
159
Josh R รีทวีตแล้ว
Rep. Don Bacon 🇺🇸✈️🏍️⭐️🎖️
I’ve been very supportive of POTUS on Iran & believe getting rid of Maduro was good. But I’ve been appalled by this Admin's tone, rhetoric, tactics & strategy toward Europe. Denigrating our allies has been terrible. Weakness communicated to Putin has caused grave damage. Passive-aggressive communication toward President Zelenskyy is embarrassing. I hear from our allies about the damage this has done & it’s going to take time to repair.
English
848
1.3K
8.3K
363.8K
Josh R รีทวีตแล้ว
Dr. Eli David
Dr. Eli David@DrEliDavid·
🚨 Breaking: The new head of Basij who replaced the previous head of Basij who was eliminated yesterday, was eliminated today
English
854
4.4K
28.3K
713.6K
Josh R รีทวีตแล้ว
John Marston
John Marston@Marston1889·
Hegseth just said on live television that no American weapons should have been sent to Ukraine yet when he was working for Fox News in 2022 he was saying to send everything to Ukraine to destroy the Russian Army. It’s absolutely clear now that the entire admin are compromised.
English
46
1.4K
7.7K
66.3K
Josh R รีทวีตแล้ว
The Reagan Caucus
The Reagan Caucus@NewReaganCaucus·
Mossad is on the phone telling regime police commanders that they're on the list and need to defect. If anybody can pull this off, it's Israel.
English
23
164
2K
20.2K
Josh R รีทวีตแล้ว
Kate from Kharkiv
Kate from Kharkiv@BohuslavskaKate·
Ex CIA Director, PETRAEUS: Ukraine is fighting our war — let's make no mistake, they're fighting NATO's war. ​(Applause) HOST: And right now, Ukraine is also protecting many countries in the Middle East with its drone technology. They're the hottest ticket in town.
English
103
2.8K
11.1K
210.9K