EMPLOYEE RETENTION SPECIALIST

16.6K posts

EMPLOYEE RETENTION SPECIALIST banner
EMPLOYEE RETENTION SPECIALIST

EMPLOYEE RETENTION SPECIALIST

@kevindmonaghan

Key Employee Retention specialist for SMB. Speaker Author- "Buckets: How Business Legends Keep Their Hustlers"

Charlotte NC เข้าร่วม Mayıs 2021
1.3K กำลังติดตาม458 ผู้ติดตาม
ทวีตที่ปักหมุด
EMPLOYEE RETENTION SPECIALIST
EMPLOYEE RETENTION SPECIALIST@kevindmonaghan·
After 11 years... We know the retention formulas- We've lost zero key employees when applied... That weren't the owner's decision. When that happens... Everyone knows where they stand and it's fair.
English
0
1
7
990
American AF 🇺🇸
American AF 🇺🇸@iAnonPatriot·
Manhattan over the last 2000 years.. This is AMAZING.
English
53
402
2.5K
237.7K
SMB Attorney
SMB Attorney@SMB_Attorney·
Why on God's green earth would you allow the New York Times to do a profile on you bragging about your fat margins if you have nothing proprietary, no moat... zero way of stopping copy cats? Something's not adding up!
Jon Oringer@jonoringer

The NYT just profiled a $1.8B revenue company with 2 employees. Medvi is a telehealth GLP-1 provider built by Matthew Gallagher, 41, from his house in LA. He launched in September 2024 with $20,000. Here are the numbers: Month 1: 300 customers Month 2: 1,300 customers 2025 full year: $401M revenue, 250,000 customers 2026 run rate: $1.8B Net margin: 16.2% ($65M profit) Total employees: 2 (him and his brother) Outside funding: $0 How it works: Medvi is a front end. Two platforms — CareValidate and OpenLoop Health — handle doctors, prescriptions, pharmacies, shipping, and compliance. Gallagher handles brand, website, ads, checkout, and customer service. All built with AI. His stack: ChatGPT, Claude, and Grok for code. Midjourney and Runway for ad creative. ElevenLabs for voice. Custom AI agents to connect systems. AI chatbot for customer service (which initially hallucinated fake prices he had to honor). For comparison: Hims & Hers did $2.4B revenue last year with 2,442 employees and 5.5% net margins. Gallagher is running 3x the margin with a fraction of a percent of the headcount. Back into the unit economics: ~$336M in total costs, probably $160-200M to the telehealth platforms, leaving $130-170M mostly in marketing. Against 250,000 customers, that's a $500-700 CAC. High, but it works because his overhead is virtually zero and LTV at ~$200/month holds up. He's expanding fast. Men's health launched in February — 50K customers in month one. Meal delivery went live last month. Women's health, hair growth, supplements, and skincare are next. The vulnerability: zero moat. No proprietary tech, no doctor network, no pharmacy infrastructure. CareValidate or OpenLoop could raise fees or launch competing brands. Anyone could replicate this model in weeks. Right now, the margins are enormous for anyone who moves fast enough. The question is how long that window stays open. nytimes.com/2026/04/02/tec…

English
47
21
888
123.3K
Kevin Henderson
Kevin Henderson@KHendersonCo·
It's with a heavy heart that I announce that I've made the difficult decision to step away from SMB Law Group. When @SMB_Attorney, @Sam_Rosati and I set out to build a new kind of law firm almost 4 years ago, I never dreamed where it would take us. And where it has taken me is to into the searcher seat myself, having recently closed on the acquisition of @SupremeWrapsDFW. So as of today, I'll be stepping down as a partner of @smblawgroup and working full time with my wife as the operators of Supreme Wraps. Thank you all for your support and the wild ride these past 4 years!
English
48
0
157
42.9K
@jason
@jason@Jason·
Easy solution to stopping socialism and AI anxiety: get half of those of us lucky enough to be in the top 1% to commit to a new "giving pledge" where they give 5% of their stock/net worth to @InvestAmerica24 accounts --- like @SusanDell and @MichaelDell did. ... as opposed to giving your money to the dysfunctional. non-profit industrial complex. tell me why I'm wrong in the comments in a thoughtful way
English
284
49
1.1K
188.4K
David Byrnes 🍀
David Byrnes 🍀@ndhawk88·
He doesn't have 2.57 billion yet. This would force him to take it when he doesn't need it, just so he can pay taxes on it. Instead, just make him and all the others pay taxes on income that they get a loan against. It's like a wealth tax but only on the wealth they are actually trying to spend.
English
1
0
4
160
Warren Gunnels
Warren Gunnels@GunnelsWarren·
Under Bernie’s 5% billionaire wealth tax, Jamie Dimon would owe $135 million in taxes, he’d still have $2.57 billion in wealth & every senior would get dental, vision & hearing benefits. Seems pretty fair for the CEO of a bank fined $27B for fraud & $290M for the Epstein scandal.
Acyn@Acyn

Kilmeade: What do you say to people like Bernie Sanders who says billionaires don't pay their fair share? Dimon: I don't know what he means by fair share

English
210
2K
7.3K
163.9K
Dan Eastman
Dan Eastman@DanEastman2023·
@PattyMurray This is actually a good idea. It never made sense to cap SS tax. If we are going to tax income to support the SS pi ai scheme then tax income. Not just work g class income. All wage income.
English
21
0
2
1.3K
Senator Patty Murray
Senator Patty Murray@PattyMurray·
If you make under $184k, you pay a 12.4% Social Security tax rate. Everything after that cap is exempt from the tax. So if you make $1 million per year, you pay about 2.2%. And it's 0.002% for billionaires. If we lifted the cap, Social Security could be funded for decades.
English
1.8K
1.3K
4.9K
320K
Elizabeth Warren
Elizabeth Warren@ewarren·
The Ultra-Millionaire Tax Act would generate over $6 trillion over the next decade—without raising taxes on 99.85% of American households. This wealth tax for millionaires and billionaires could pay for universal child care, free community college, Medicare expansion, and more.
English
4.3K
1.9K
7.9K
832.3K
Adam Rossi
Adam Rossi@rossiadam·
You may notice that we call our offgrid stronghold “Kingdom Come”. The reason is because of this ruin on the property. It is built on a limestone cliff overlooking the Shenandoah River. It was in bad shape so we repointed it and rebuilt the wood. Why the name? 1/4
Adam Rossi tweet mediaAdam Rossi tweet mediaAdam Rossi tweet mediaAdam Rossi tweet media
English
15
2
157
20.6K
Brian Beers
Brian Beers@brianbeers·
Just installed these in my shops Now instead of paying $0.75 per cup I’m gonna profit $2.50 Should make $100,000 profit per year My customers & employees are thrilled!
Brian Beers tweet media
English
29
0
80
25.1K
Dominus Ignota
Dominus Ignota@dominustweet·
@notespacer @GrahamStephan The wealthy have essentially always paid the same effective tax rate regardless of the top marginal rate. Think about that.
English
2
0
0
83
notespacer
notespacer@notespacer·
I believe USA in the 50s-60s was a fair system. I want to see a strong middle class. Because of tech/financialization the rich have benefited way more by holding assets. If not excessive, a wealth tax would not drive out the rich and bring us a step closer to the 50s sense of equilibrium bt rich and middle class
English
5
0
11
1.3K
Crime Net
Crime Net@TRIGGERHAPPYV1·
SAD: 74-year-old man sells his beloved car of 34 years and says his final goodbye 💔
English
1.2K
5.3K
107.6K
22.2M
Teamsters
Teamsters@Teamsters·
ICYMI: This week Uber & Lyft drivers with the Drivers Union are celebrating the passage of a Fair Pay standard by the Seattle City Council, further cementing Seattle’s position as a national leader on groundbreaking labor protections for gig workers. teamster.org/2020/09/uber-a… #1u
English
1
5
8
0
Fuck You I Quit
Fuck You I Quit@fuckyouiquit·
A 2% annual tax on that wealth would cover all of what we currently spend on Medicare without anyone else paying a dime. And that wealth would still continue to grow. We can't afford not to tax them at this point.
More Perfect Union@MorePerfectUS

The top 1% now has $53 trillion in wealth, while the bottom 50% holds less than $5 trillion. How do we close the gap? Actually tax the rich. This is how states are pushing for equitable taxes–and relief for the working class. Thread:

English
179
355
1.8K
68.7K
Molly O’Shea
Molly O’Shea@MollySOShea·
BREAKING: David @friedberg says "California is functionally bankrupt" "People don't realize how screwed California is, & I worry that if California falls, so does the union. "$250 billion to $1 trillion short." "This is because for California to get rescued would be a big cost to red states, & I think it creates in the years ahead a lot of tension." "California's functional bankruptcy is a major risk to the country. & I think we need to figure out what we can change to fix it." How we got here: "California has a public pension system, & that public pension system retirees have paid into it & they get some benefits out, & the amount that they're owed back out is somewhere between $250 billion - $1 trillion dollars more than has been paid in. $250 billion to $1 trillion short. If it was the federal government, it would be like, okay, we'll just print more money. California doesn't have the ability to print money, so California has to pay this out, and you can't restructure retirement benefits. There is a Supreme Court case in California that said that once an employee has been offered retirement benefits, even if they're currently an employee, you can never restructure their retirement benefits. It has to stay forever, and the state cannot declare bankruptcy. There's no way for the state to functionally declare bankruptcy. There's no law to allow it. No state has ever declared bankruptcy, and the retirement benefits sit senior to the bonds in California. So you have to pay out the retirement benefits before you pay out all the bond holders that have loaned California the money that they use to run all their programs and services." Hill & Valley Forum 2026 (@HillValleyForum)
Chamath Palihapitiya@chamath

California will be bankrupt by 2030. If you’re expecting a state pension, it is at risk. If you don’t believe it, check Grok or Gemini and explore how California politicians changed the reporting rules on your pension so they could hide how underwater it is. The middle class citizens of California will soon be asked to pay a huge price to bail out the state. Why them? Because that is where most of the wealth of California resides. It’s easy to single out “billionaires” but there aren’t many of them and they can and will all leave before the bottom falls out. They are leaving in droves already. The mismanagement in California is biblical - and the scale is huge because it’s the world’s 4th largest economy. California politicians and their henchmen are now entering the coverup phase where they can no longer hide their financial incompetence so they are taking from average California residents to try and hide what they’ve done: You will soon see ballot initiatives with fancy tiles like “billionaire tax”. But those are lies. They are mechanisms to tax everything, every way: Excise taxes Wealth taxes Private property confiscation It’s all happening now. If you want to preserve California, you will need to stand up because California has become a kleptocracy.

English
743
2.6K
12.5K
2.6M
Sen. Bernie Sanders
Sen. Bernie Sanders@SenSanders·
The American people are sick and tired of billionaires threatening to move the sports teams they own to different states unless they get hundreds of millions in corporate welfare to build new stadiums. The Home Team Act begins to address this problem. twitter.com/i/broadcasts/1…
English
482
376
1.6K
232.2K