Lector

77 posts

Lector banner
Lector

Lector

@lectorlibrorum

Exploring the wisdom of the ages, one book at a time. Reading, reflecting, and commenting on the great and important works that shape our world.

Alexandria เข้าร่วม Mart 2020
519 กำลังติดตาม214 ผู้ติดตาม
Lector
Lector@lectorlibrorum·
@SovMichael It sounds like Guillaume Faye's Archeofuturism, which was to an extent absorbed and transformed by Dugin. If that's correct, then the New American Right is a descendant from the New European Right.
English
0
0
3
115
Michael O'Fallon - Sovereign Nations
I think it's the perfect time to re-share my presentation on what refers to itself as "Christian Nationalism" and Mike Flynn's part in the psyop. Gen. Micheal Flynn: "So if we are going to have one nation under God, which we must, we have to have one religion, one nation under God and one religion under God, right?" And of course, the only way to achieve this is by Balkanizing the United States and creating techno-feudalist micro-nations that have torn the constitution to pieces. "Cuius regio, eius religio" "whose realm, his religion" The new system: Variable Neo-Integralism within techno-feudalist communities in a digital, post-work world. The same system that has been promoted by the WEF for decades. @dbongino @ConceptualJames @glennbeck @marklevinshow @DavidLimbaugh @ANTlWEF
Michael O'Fallon - Sovereign Nations@SovMichael

(1) 🧵 In the United States, Mike Flynn is the most well-known and politically influential Christian Nationalist. During a recent gathering at John Hague's church, General Mike Flynn declared to a conservative audience at a ReAwaken event: "If we want to have a nation under God, as we must, we need to have one religion. A nation under God and a religion under God, right? All of us working together." Which religion is Mike Flynn referring to? Who is responsible for this "one religion?" Who will determine the doctrinal positions and what is considered against the accepted teachings of this "one religion?" Are there any consequences for not adhering to the pronouncements of this religion? Mike Flynn did not state, "We hope to regain this nation's devotion to God by spreading peace, grace, and love through the teachings of the Gospel of Jesus Christ." No. Mike Flynn claimed that we must have one religion under God in the United States. However, Mike Flynn never specifies which religion he is referring to in his ambiguous statement. What religion is Mike Flynn alluding to? During another stop on the ReAwaken America tour, Mike Flynn led thousands of unsuspecting men and women in a prayer led by Elizabeth Clare Prophet, a Theosophical, Gnostic, Hermetic Priestess. Elizabeth Clare Prophet prayed: "I am the instrument of those sevenfold rays and archangels! And I will not back down. I will take my stand. I will not be afraid to speak. I will serve as God's instrument, regardless of his will. Here I am, with God's help! In the name of Archangel Michael and his legions, I am born free and will remain free. I will not be enslaved by any enemy, both within and outside." General Mike Flynn prayed: "We are your instruments of those sevenfold rays and all your archangels, every single one of them. We will not back down, we will stand our ground. We will not be afraid to speak. We will serve as your instruments, no matter your will. In your name and the name of your legions, we are born free and will remain free. We will not be enslaved by any enemy, both within and outside, with God's help." General Mike Flynn led unsuspecting and well-intentioned Christians through a prayer from a Theosophical Priestess, Elizabeth Clare Prophet, altering the prayer from the singular "I am" to the plural "We are." The prayer, which first appeared in Elizabeth Clare Prophet’s book where she claimed to have channeled the Archangel Michael during EC Prophet’s “The Flame of Freedom Speaks” conference in 1984 (see more below). Prophet and Flynn’s prayer refers to "those sevenfold rays." According to one of EC Prophet's greatest influencers, Alice Bailey, each Ray is an expression of the Hindu Trinity or the Gnostic/Hermetic-influenced Seven Sephiroth of Kabbalah.A ray is but a name for a particular force or type of energy, with an emphasis on the quality that force exhibits, rather than the form aspect it creates. This is a true definition of a ray." (Esoteric Psychology, Vol. I, p.315). Alice Bailey states that each Ray is an expression of the Hindu Trinity or the Gnostic/Hermetic-influenced Seven Sephiroth of Kabbalah. "Ray I: The Ray of Will and Power Ray II: The Ray of Love-Wisdom Ray III: The Ray of Active Intelligence and Adaptability (also known as The Ray of Creative Intelligence) Ray IV: The Ray of Harmony through Conflict (also known as The Ray of Harmony, Beauty, and Art) Ray V: The Ray of Concrete Knowledge or Science Ray VI: The Ray of Devotion and Abstract Idealism Ray VII: The Ray of Ceremonial Order or Magic" To reiterate, General Mike Flynn had unsuspecting American Christians repeat, word-for-word, a "prayer" that was channeled through a Theosophic Priestess and had origins in Gnostic and Hermetic teachings. This is "MAGA" Christian Nationalism. The following video is part of a presentation that I gave at the "With Liberty and Freedom for All" conference in July of 2023 alongside @ConceptualJames , @XVanFleet , @billroach_ , @jonbenz , @AndrewNWoodard @glennbeck @charliekirk11

English
5
45
125
10.1K
Andrew Bolis
Andrew Bolis@AndrewBolis·
Canva + 60 minutes a day + a laptop + an internet connection = $339 per day Usually, I'd charge $87 for this guide, but today I'm giving it away 100% FREE. Like + Comment 'Canva' & I'll send you my step-by-step guide for FREE. Must follow me to get DM. FREE for 48 hours.
Andrew Bolis tweet media
English
455
51
390
48.6K
Lector
Lector@lectorlibrorum·
@Istarri1 @NovusOrdoWatch Si respetas la verdad, entonces debes querer conocer la verdad. Para conocer la verdad sobre si puedes o no EXIGIR una confesión pública de un pecador, debes estudiar las enseñanzas de la Iglesia y su ley. De lo contrario, es solo tu opinión privada y no la verdad.
Español
0
0
0
11
Istarri 🐦
Istarri 🐦@Istarri1·
@lectorlibrorum @NovusOrdoWatch Tú sigue con tus ideas inútiles rondándote la cabeza como polillas alrededor de una vela. Yo seguiré diciendo la verdad evidente a quien quiera oír.
Español
2
0
0
46
Lector
Lector@lectorlibrorum·
@Istarri1 @NovusOrdoWatch Una vez más, la Iglesia tiene una ley y debemos seguirla incluso cuando hay una crisis. Si quieres saber cómo funciona y quién se encarga de imponer las reparaciones, estudia el Derecho Canónico.
Español
1
0
0
10
Istarri 🐦
Istarri 🐦@Istarri1·
@lectorlibrorum @NovusOrdoWatch Ah, sí ??? Y quién se lo va a imponer, si se puede saber ??? Mi pregunta permanece: Puede un papa que cometió pecado público de apostasía y de adoración de demonios hace décadas quedarse tan tranquilo después de que el pecado se conoce por todo mundo ???
Español
1
0
0
27
Lector
Lector@lectorlibrorum·
@Istarri1 @NovusOrdoWatch Ninguna ley vigente de la Iglesia exige la confesión pública (declarar el pecado abiertamente en un contexto litúrgico o comunitario) ni el arrepentimiento público (una retractación pública) como condición para la absolución o la readmisión a los sacramentos.
Español
0
0
0
9
Istarri 🐦
Istarri 🐦@Istarri1·
@lectorlibrorum @NovusOrdoWatch Pues tú mismo me estás dando la razón. Sí llevaste LÓGICA en la Secundaria ? Puede un papa que cometió pecado público de apostasía y de adoración de demonios hace décadas quedarse tan tranquilo después de que el pecado se conoce por todo mundo ??? 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Istarri 🐦 tweet media
Español
3
0
0
31
Lector
Lector@lectorlibrorum·
@Istarri1 @NovusOrdoWatch Primero asegúrate de leer bien y de entender lo que lees. No lees bien y no pareces entender la diferencia entre confesión, arrepentimiento y reparación. Estudia antes de enseñar.
Español
0
0
0
10
Lector
Lector@lectorlibrorum·
@Istarri1 @NovusOrdoWatch Existe una clara diferencia entre la confesión, el arrepentimiento y la reparación. La reparación pública puede ser impuesta como una medida disciplinaria, especialmente si el pecador es un clérigo.
Español
0
0
0
9
Lector
Lector@lectorlibrorum·
@Istarri1 @NovusOrdoWatch Eso no es lo que enseña el Magisterio de la Iglesia. Tampoco es requerido por el Derecho Canónico. ¿De dónde sacas estas ideas? ¿De tu propio juicio privado?
Español
2
0
0
8
Lector
Lector@lectorlibrorum·
@CatholicSOTC What is the correct moral action when you learn of someone's sin? To post it publicly for millions to see? Or to talk to the sinner first and ask if he understand why that's a sin and if he repents from it?
English
0
0
1
41
Lector
Lector@lectorlibrorum·
@Istarri1 @NovusOrdoWatch Seguro que el pecador tiene el deber de reparar el daño causado a la fe o a la moral de los demás. Pero ese deber es un deber de reparación, y no de arrepentimiento o confesión, los cuales no necesitan ser públicos, como enseña la Iglesia.
Español
0
0
0
9
Istarri 🐦
Istarri 🐦@Istarri1·
@lectorlibrorum @NovusOrdoWatch Como es un pecado y escándalo públicos, su arrepentimiento debería ser, asimismo, público. Más por tratarse de quién hoy se trata.
Español
2
0
0
18
Timothy Gordon (Rules for Retrogrades Show)
You and I aren't guilty of eating the apple in the Garden, but we are nonetheless cursed by Original Sin Modern Jews are not guilty of the death of Christ, but all unbaptized Jews are cursed by the killing of God by their ancestors This is the Catholic teaching from Lateran IV and Florence
English
27
62
527
14.8K
Lector
Lector@lectorlibrorum·
@complicitclergy Is there a magisterial teaching on Israel as a political entity? I am seriously asking for a reference.
English
0
0
1
82
Lector
Lector@lectorlibrorum·
@DSDOConnor @ConceptualJames It is kind of ironic to see James, who has devoted his time and effort to fighting left and right-wing ideologies, fall prey to the silliest of them, Libertarianism.
English
0
0
1
62
Daniel O'Connor
Daniel O'Connor@DSDOConnor·
That's literally your whole argument, James. “We can’t outlaw things like pornography and adultery. Because if we outlaw things, we’ll get used to outlawing things. And if we get used to outlawing things, we might wind up outlawing Capitalism.” This is too silly of an argument to bother refuting. Though you get a hearing because you always try to coin new terms (the oldest trick in the book for an unworthy man to grasp at undeserved attention) and use needlessly big words (interspersed with remarkably childish outbursts). And your defense always takes the same form: “Look at this horrible thing that some Evangelical or Muslim did because of his religious convictions. Therefore, enacting legislation inspired by religious convictions must be wrong. Can’t do it! Libertarian anarchy is the only way!” Ridiculous.
English
2
4
68
1.2K
James Lindsay, anti-Communist
James Lindsay, anti-Communist@ConceptualJames·
Lol they should have this guy in petting zoos for the kids to pat on the head
English
1
0
15
3.4K
Lector
Lector@lectorlibrorum·
@Theresa94099262 @ConceptualJames So you see no difference between rejecting popes legitimately elected and waiting for a new pope to be elected. You seem smart!
English
0
0
0
14
Theresa Smith
Theresa Smith@Theresa94099262·
@lectorlibrorum @ConceptualJames When a pope dies, we are all sedevacantists. This doesn't make a Catholic a schismatic. Sedevacantists believe in the Papacy, the supremacy, the Chair of Peter. The only difference is that they think the Chair is empty b/c the one in it is in heresy.
English
1
0
1
32