fmarrr

93 posts

fmarrr banner
fmarrr

fmarrr

@maflora89

🐢📊🤹🏻‍♀️ Data and operational support at @GyroStable Gyroscope exploring and learning things, just like the status of 🐼 here picture credit: myself

เข้าร่วม Ocak 2022
113 กำลังติดตาม45 ผู้ติดตาม
fmarrr รีทวีตแล้ว
Ariah Klages-Mundt
Ariah Klages-Mundt@aklamun·
Sometimes this space is a joke and it’s on us to speak up more about it. A funny story: we were working with some of the same integrators for incorporating Gyroscope’s GYD last year. And the level of due diligence they put on us was so much more than the same integrations for stuff like Stream, which had these huge red flags and which of course blew up. It ended up making growth things really difficult for GYD but amplifies the unsustainable growth of things like Stream. No value was recognized for Gyroscope’s (still) unique level of onchain risk controls and guardrails. But anything that promises obviously ridiculous yields are ushered straight in without seemingly any diligence. A little ironically, things might be a lot different now with the value of token emissions collapsing and (hopefully) greater appreciation earned for risk-adjusted yield instead of just yield (and risk) maxing after these blow-ups.
Albus of the Farm 🤌@FarmerAlbus

Had sent this to the @Dialectic_Group team slack, April 27th 2025 Will start posting these things here too, maybe save some degens from getting rekt

English
3
5
20
3.9K
fmarrr รีทวีตแล้ว
Ariah Klages-Mundt
Ariah Klages-Mundt@aklamun·
Why Gyro pools were unaffected in the exploit last week tldr: Balancer V2 has a guardrail system to account for numerical error that may arise. However, the flash loan-like component built into Balancer’s Composable Stable Pools—essentially an ability to flash-borrow LP shares from all other LPers—allowed this guardrail to be bypassed. Numerical error that would have been negligible was then manipulated into being significant, allowing the attacker to withdraw all assets from affected pools. Gyroscope uses simpler structure—no flash loan-like component for simplicity—and is therefore not impacted. The core issue: A numerical guardrail could be bypassed by the flash loan-like component built into Balancer’s Composable Stable Pool. This flash loan component allowed the guardrail to fail to keep pool balances above a lower bound, and therefore the pool could not account for numerical error as designed. This numerical guardrail is supposed to work by sending an amount of LP shares to the zero address at pool initialization. This is meant to guarantee that pool balances never get too small (the burned LP shares can never be exited, leaving a lower bound of assets in the pool balances and LP shares in existence). This lower bound would ensure that numerical error from fixed point arithmetic doesn’t become significant. The flash loan component of Composable Stable Pools unfortunately allowed this guardrail to be bypassed since even the burned LP shares could be flash borrowed. Within the flash loan, the attacker could then withdraw nearly all assets from the pool, even those corresponding to the burned LP shares, and violate the intended lower bound. With the guardrail bypassed, numerical error that would otherwise be negligible could be manipulated into being significant, enabling the attacker to manipulate the state of the pool and withdraw all liquidity. Numerical error from one incorrect rounding direction, which would have been negligible compared to the intended lower bound on pool balances, can be manipulated to have a large effect if the pool has near zero balances. For example, a 1e-18 error on 1e-18 balance is very large whereas a 1e-18 error on 1e-10 balance is still small by many decimals. This allowed the attacker to manipulate the state of the pool into a form that allowed them to withdraw all liquidity. Gyroscope uses a simpler structure—no flash loan-like component for simplicity. The guardrail, when working properly, makes this not possible. And it worked correctly to prevent this from happening to Gyro pools and other pool types, which don’t have the flash loan-like component. Secondary point: Balancer’s pool pause windows were too short. Gyro uses longer windows, and so pools could still be paused in precaution. Balancer pools default to a 1 year pause window. Is this enough time? Unfortunately, the answer was also “no”. Many of the pools that were exploited could not be paused, which may have saved many LPs given how this particular exploit was executed. For Gyro, we opted for a much longer pause window in almost all pools with this risk in mind. In this case, in addition to Gyro pools not having been vulnerable, they could also still be paused out of precaution.
Gyroscope@GyroStable

Gyroscope pools are unaffected by Monday’s exploit on Balancer. They were never at risk, but were paused for precaution while the scope of the exploit was unclear. Following the release of the postmortem, most Gyroscope pools are now unpaused and returned to normal business.

English
3
6
19
2.2K
fmarrr รีทวีตแล้ว
Gyroscope
Gyroscope@GyroStable·
Gyroscope pools are unaffected by today’s exploit on Balancer. The exploit is isolated to Balancer’s Composable Stable Pool type. Gyro pools are a separate pool type with comparatively simpler architecture than the Composable Stable Pools and do not have the same attack surface. To the best knowledge of Gyroscope and Balancer teams, Gyro pools remain safe to use. The Gyro team (FTL Labs) is closely in touch with Balancer on this. Nevertheless, out of an abundance of caution, Gyroscope pools will remain paused until a detailed postmortem is available. This means that joins and swaps are disabled; withdrawals are unaffected.
Balancer@Balancer

Today, around 7:48 AM UTC, an exploit affected Balancer V2 Composable Stable Pools. Our team is working with leading security researchers to understand the issue and will share additional findings and a full post-mortem as soon as possible. Because these pools have been live onchain for several years, many were outside the pause window. Any pools that could be paused have been paused and are now in recovery mode. All other Balancer pools are unaffected. This issue is isolated to V2 Composable Stable Pools and does not impact Balancer V3 or other Balancer pools. Balancer is committed to operational security, has undergone extensive auditing by top firms, and had bug bounties running for a long time to incentivize independent auditors. We are working closely with our security and legal teams to ensure user safety and are conducting a swift & thorough investigation. We’re grateful to our partners and the broader DeFi community for their support. Security notice: Fraudulent messages claiming to be from the Balancer Security Team are circulating. These are not from us. Do not interact with unsolicited communications or click unknown links. Official updates will be posted only via: - This official Balancer account on X (Twitter) - Our official Discord server Be careful with communications from other sources, they can be fraudulent. We will provide a comprehensive update with more details as our investigation progresses. The Balancer Team.

English
0
6
26
4.6K
fmarrr รีทวีตแล้ว
Gyroscope
Gyroscope@GyroStable·
tldr: Gyro Dynamic Pools are gud and are cracking the profitable passive LP category. If you want to learn more about why:
Gyroscope@GyroStable

Why do Gyro’s Dynamic CLPs perform so well? The key is having a good strategy that works as a passive pool and to optimize for the right thing. Gyro pools are designed to: - optimize for profitability, not volume - don’t over-concentrate or under-cut swap fees, don’t compete with professional market makers (who are far from passive) - rake in fees while the pool is in a stable range. Pools preserve constant invariant in these times, which protects LPs while they harvest volatility. - Shift liquidity in doubly safeguarded way that’s designed to be *infrequent* and so preserve constant invariant benefits for longer (reduce implicit costs of shifting liquidity). In practice, this aims to contain toxic flow while boosting the ability to access non-toxic flow. While operating an effective volatility harvesting strategy (earn as prices wiggle back and forth naturally). Constant invariant was one of the original benefits of AMMs. Uniswap v2 has the constant product invariant. Constant invariant defines limits to the losses you can take from market movements and gives mathematical properties about passive volatility harvesting (harvesting yield as prices wiggle back and forth for a period of time). Concentrated liquidity in general negates these benefits as you lose the constant invariant every time you change position, and it’s easy to build up real losses. Gyro CLPs shine by providing solid LP strategy in a simple passive package where the calibration is already done for you. In a way that no one else offers today.

English
0
4
12
937
Dmitry | DeFi Vibe 🎯
Dmitry | DeFi Vibe 🎯@0xZloiZayats·
6/ Gyroscope keeps proving that adaptive liquidity might be #DEFİ next evolution. No hype. No empty APYs. Just solid mechanics. Real yield starts where people stop paying attention.
English
1
0
3
75
Dmitry | DeFi Vibe 🎯
Dmitry | DeFi Vibe 🎯@0xZloiZayats·
1/ Everyone chasing memecoins. Meanwhile, @GyroStable Dynamic ETH/USDC pool on Base quietly printing ~72% APR. I threw a few bucks in to test it. Heres what I found.
Dmitry | DeFi Vibe 🎯 tweet media
English
5
2
13
411
Gyroscope
Gyroscope@GyroStable·
How profitable are Gyro Dynamic CLPs? New simple measure: how much a delta-neutral LP makes in USD after hedging asset exposure. A new research piece backtests on real E-CLPs: - 134% APY from Dec '24 - Aug '25 - PnL growth in 73% of hours (87% of 30-day rolling periods) 🧵👇
Gyroscope tweet media
English
7
9
29
31.5K
fmarrr
fmarrr@maflora89·
@HonzaBB @GyroStable here is the query if interested to see more: dune.com/queries/588529… eclp is 9955 compare with hodl(9756) and eth 100%(9513) This is only for the past month tho, when eth has gone down. worth changing the start date you interested
English
0
0
1
96
fmarrr
fmarrr@maflora89·
Portfolio on $10K if invested from 1 Sep and in: 1) All in ETH 2) 50%ETH; 50%USDC 3) All in @GyroStable Dynamic E-CLP Dynamic E-CLP gives the highest return.
fmarrr tweet media
English
1
0
1
60
fmarrr
fmarrr@maflora89·
Numbers talk. 📊Pink line (E-CLPs) leaves the rest behind
zethes 🐼@zethesx

Why can E-CLPs outperform? @beets_fi now measures LP edge via “markouts”. Numbers talk. Dynamic E-CLPs delivering positive markouts and, on other chains, outperforming Uniswap v2 by ~3.5x and v3 by ~33x on ETH/USDC since launch. Why? Liquidity recenters automatically, spreads adapt to volatility, and routing is optimized to avoid toxic order flow. On @SonicLabs, this design is turbo-charged by low fees + fast finality → more frequent micro-adjustments are actually viable. Translation: smarter fills, more fee capture, less screentime. This all now powered also by $S thanks to @GyroStable. Turn on notifications, next up: how to LP

English
0
1
5
321
fmarrr รีทวีตแล้ว
Ariah Klages-Mundt
Ariah Klages-Mundt@aklamun·
I sat down with BlockBeats to discuss the evolution of DEXs and how @GyroStable’s Dynamic CLPs are restoring strong performance for passive LPs, at a time when most concentrated liquidity strategies underperform 👇
BlockBeats|We're hiring!@BlockBeatsAsia

在 DeFi愈发拥挤今天,做「被动 LP」散户正逐渐成为无声的牺牲品,@GyroStable 正试图改变这一现状,它从结构设计出发、专为被动LP打造新型做市系统 律动 BlockBeats 最近专访Gyroscope联创 @aklamun ,聊聊如何用结构性设计取代策略盲选,让长期收益变成可复制的设计能力 theblockbeats.info/news/59404

English
0
5
12
1.4K
fmarrr รีทวีตแล้ว
BlockBeats|We're hiring!
BlockBeats|We're hiring!@BlockBeatsAsia·
在 DeFi愈发拥挤今天,做「被动 LP」散户正逐渐成为无声的牺牲品,@GyroStable 正试图改变这一现状,它从结构设计出发、专为被动LP打造新型做市系统 律动 BlockBeats 最近专访Gyroscope联创 @aklamun ,聊聊如何用结构性设计取代策略盲选,让长期收益变成可复制的设计能力 theblockbeats.info/news/59404
中文
0
2
8
9.4K
fmarrr
fmarrr@maflora89·
spotlighting the sonic @SonicLabs dynamic @GyroStable E-CLP wS-USDC pool today, delivering 600%+ capital efficiency and 93% APR
fmarrr tweet media
English
0
0
0
35
fmarrr
fmarrr@maflora89·
@GyroStable All data pulled and markouts computed using @Dune, fully accessible for anyone to explore!
English
2
0
1
134
Gyroscope
Gyroscope@GyroStable·
Gyroscope is making waves with positive markouts for LPs. Here’s an in-depth view of the Dynamic E-CLP's market-leading performance by Gyroscope’s @maflora89. 🧵 and article 👇
Gyroscope tweet media
English
3
6
31
22.1K
fmarrr
fmarrr@maflora89·
Did this analysis to compare market making performance. E-CLP(Pink) outperformed from Dec to Feb - making it profitable for LPs. But this was just static E-CLP. When this pool design goes dynamic, set-and-forget market making may be entering a new era. @GyroStable
fmarrr tweet media
Gyroscope@GyroStable

Why to be excited about Gyroscope's dynamic pools 👇 Gyroscope's revenue model focuses on high volume Volatile Pair pools. The profitability was demonstrated in Dec-Feb. Dynamic pools make scaling Volatile Pairs more efficient with 1) 2x volume ability 2) reduced churn

English
0
0
4
76
fmarrr
fmarrr@maflora89·
Spotted the USDC/USDbC pool on @base is doing great with a 24h capital efficiency of 2258% This showcases the power of the Concentrated Liquidity E-CLP from @GyroStable, plus there are incentives to collect
fmarrr tweet media
Gyroscope@GyroStable

New @base pools now live with GYD rewards - sUSDe/GYD - USDC/USDbC - WETH/cbBTC Plus renewed rewards on key ETH & GYD pairs.

English
0
4
14
1.5K