Marcolin

23.4K posts

Marcolin banner
Marcolin

Marcolin

@marcolinx

Rio de Janeiro, Brazil เข้าร่วม Nisan 2014
6.9K กำลังติดตาม1.8K ผู้ติดตาม
ทวีตที่ปักหมุด
Marcolin
Marcolin@marcolinx·
A espetacular história do navio de guerra da Marinha do Brasil, o mais antigo do mundo ainda na ativa e q participou da Segunda Guerra contra os submarinos alemães e escoltou um porta aviões americano! C vcs, a incrível odisseia do bravo Jaú do Pantanal! sociedademilitar.com.br/2023/03/marinh…
Português
6
8
33
6.9K
Marcolin รีทวีตแล้ว
Alex Boge
Alex Boge@alexboge·
In case you missed it: x.com/alexboge/statu…
Alex Boge@alexboge

The Lunar Laser Ranging Retroreflector (LRRR) is incontrovertible proof that Apollo 11 astronauts landed on the moon on July 20, 1969. Of course, “incontrovertible” means nothing to moon landing deniers - MoLDs - will simply wave their hands and recite the same tired script that someone else prepared for them decades ago. I will go into detail below and in a second comment (due to length), but suffice it to say that at this point, the MoLDs have already rolled their eyes and begun preparing their standard replies. Some will respond with the exact points I am about to address below - having either ignored them, failed to understand them, or chosen willful ignorance. Others will simply skip past this entirely and retreat to their other tired and familiar talking points. That is, of course, typical. But I am hoping that others will enjoy this breakdown and utter debunking of moon landing denial. TL;DR: • A precision laser retroreflector is sitting on the Moon exactly where Apollo 11 placed it • Independent observatories have been measuring returns from it for decades • The signal is fundamentally different from random surface reflections • No other nation had the capability or motive to place it there in 1969 • It’s still working today 🧵1/2 Now, Let’s walk through it fully: On July 21, 1969, Buzz Aldrin carefully placed and precisely aligned the LRRR at Tranquility Base, orienting it to face Earth. This was not a device you could simply drop or plop into place. The alignment had to be deliberate and accurate - the device had to be leveled to within 0.5 degrees of the local vertical and pointed toward Earth. Aldrin accomplished this using a gnomon - a sundial-like instrument that casts a shadow onto a leveling scale - to achieve that precision on uneven lunar regolith. The retroreflector has a very narrow field of view - it is not like a mirror that works from any angle. If it were poorly placed or misaligned, the laser beam from Earth would miss it entirely or return nothing usable. No robotic lander in 1969 possessed the dexterity to perform that kind of tilt-and-level calibration on an uneven surface. This required human hands. Before Apollo 11 left the lunar surface, the reflector was tested and confirmed operational. Since 1969, multiple independent observatories and universities around the world have been bouncing lasers off that reflector - none of them NASA operations: • McDonald Observatory, University of Texas at Austin • Apache Point Observatory, New Mexico • Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur (Grasse station), France • Haleakala Observatory, Hawaii • Matera Laser Ranging Observatory, Italy Universities and research institutions across multiple nations - all getting the same unmistakable signal from the exact same location where Buzz Aldrin placed that reflector over fifty years ago. 1/2 🧵 continues …

English
0
3
10
407
Marcolin รีทวีตแล้ว
Alex Boge
Alex Boge@alexboge·
The Moon Rocks. Moon Landing Denial Killers. If you missed my previous post, we covered the Lunar Laser Ranging Retroreflector - the device Buzz Aldrin personally placed and aligned on the lunar surface on July 21, 1969, which independent observatories on multiple continents have been ranging ever since. MoLDs - moon landing deniers - had no credible answer for it. They will have no credible answer for this either. Between Apollo 11 and Apollo 17, astronauts returned 382 kilograms of lunar soil and rock to Earth. These were documented geologic samples collected from known lunar locations, photographed in place, cataloged, and distributed to laboratories worldwide - including in Cold War rival nations. The material includes mare basalts, highland anorthosites, impact breccias formed in vacuum, glass spherules from micrometeorite bombardment, and solar wind particles implanted directly into surface grains. These samples show extremely low volatile and water content, no atmospheric oxidation, micrometeorite impact features consistent only with an airless environment, and cosmic ray exposure consistent with long surface residence. Here is where it gets technically decisive. Oxygen isotope ratios in the Apollo samples fall on the terrestrial fractionation line - confirming the shared Earth-Moon origin - yet they show distinct trace-element partitioning, siderophile depletion, and titanium isotope variations consistent with lunar differentiation and early magma ocean crystallization. These signatures were independently measured worldwide using high-precision mass spectrometry and are internally consistent across samples from multiple sites and multiple missions. You cannot fake that. Not in 1969. Not now. Now, MoLDs will raise their standard objections. Here they are, and here is why they fail. OBJECTION 1: NASA faked the rocks using Earth materials or meteorites. No terrestrial material matches the full suite of characteristics found in Apollo samples. The combination of vacuum-formed impact breccias, solar wind implantation, zero hydration, and the specific isotopic signatures described above cannot be replicated in any laboratory on Earth - then or now. As for the claim that NASA secretly gathered lunar meteorites found on Earth - Apollo samples established the scientific baseline that later allowed researchers to identify lunar meteorites in the first place. The rocks came first. The identification method came from them. OBJECTION 2: The Soviet Union could have supplied the samples. Before Apollo 11, there were zero successful lunar sample-return missions anywhere on Earth. The Soviet Union’s first was Luna 16 in 1970 - returning just 101 grams. Apollo 11 alone returned 21.5 kilograms. There was no prior sample-return capability. There was no hidden precursor. There was nothing to steal, borrow, or fake from. OBJECTION 3: The stolen and fake rock cases prove NASA can’t be trusted. MoLDs occasionally cite the petrified wood case in the Netherlands or the stolen goodwill rock from Honduras as evidence of NASA deception. These involved small diplomatic display plaques - decorative items, not scientific samples. They have nothing to do with NASA’s curated research collection or the Astronauts. The 382 kilograms of cataloged Apollo material remain secured, documented, and continuously studied to this day. The samples match orbital spectroscopy. They match later robotic missions. They match Soviet sample returns. They were analyzed by independent laboratories across multiple nations, including nations that had every geopolitical reason to expose a fraud if one existed. There was no prior sample-return capability. There was no terrestrial substitute. There was no hiding this from the world. Independent tracking. Independent laboratories. Independent nations. Incontrovertible proof. MoLDs have no credible answer for any of it.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ A dozen men walked on the moon. Soon, more will return and do even more.
Alex Boge tweet mediaAlex Boge tweet mediaAlex Boge tweet media
English
17
24
120
3.8K
Marcolin รีทวีตแล้ว
PM Agria ⬛🟫🟪
Trump segue queimando pontes... uma parte considerável do MAGA é composta pelo movimento "neocatólico nacionalista", representado pelo vice Vance... Sem contar a parte protestante carismática... Pode ser divertido para um velho ganancioso e ególatra com mentalidade imatura e mimada e seus fãs abobados, mas não é postura de estadista, nem mesmo de político populista. Tem preço, principalmente envolvendo religião.
Português
0
1
3
58
Saganism
Saganism@Saganismm·
“Around the time of the Apollo lunar landings, many nonexperts— owners of small telescopes, flying saucer zealots, writers for aerospace magazines—pored over the returned photographs seeking anomalies that NASA scientists and astronauts had overlooked. Soon there were reports of gigantic Latin letters and Arabic numerals inscribed on the lunar surface, pyramids, highways, crosses, glowing UFOs. Bridges were reported on the Moon, radio antennas, the tracks of enormous crawling vehicles, and the devastation left by machines able to slice craters in two. Every one of these claims, though, turns out to be a natural lunar geological formation misjudged by amateur analysts, internal reflections in the optics of the astronauts' Hasselblad cameras, and the like. Some enthusiasts discerned the long shadows of ballistic missiles —Soviet missiles it was ominously confided, aimed at America. The rockets, also described as "spires," turn out to be low hills casting long shadows when the Sun is near the lunar horizon. A little trigonometry dispels the mirage. These experiences also provide fair warning: For a complex terrain sculpted by unfamiliar processes, amateurs (and sometimes even professionals) examining photographs, especially near the limit of resolution, may get into trouble. Their hopes and fears, the excitement of possible discoveries of great import, may overwhelm the usual skeptical and cautious approach of science.” — Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark
Saganism tweet mediaSaganism tweet mediaSaganism tweet media
English
6
26
233
12.6K
Marcolin รีทวีตแล้ว
JAMES WEBB
JAMES WEBB@jameswebb_nasa·
Qual o salário de um astronauta? Spoiler: não é astronômico. Os astronautas da missão Artemis II, por exemplo, não recebem salários extraordinários pela natureza histórica do voo. Como funcionários civis da NASA, eles são remunerados segundo a tabela federal conhecida como General Schedule (GS), a mesma aplicada a outros servidores públicos dos Estados Unidos. Na prática, isso significa que nomes como Reid Wiseman, Victor Glover e Christina Koch recebem, em geral, entre US$ 100 mil e US$ 160 mil por ano, podendo alcançar valores próximos de US$ 170 mil ou um pouco mais nos níveis mais altos da carreira (GS-15), dependendo da experiência e de ajustes regionais, como os aplicados em Houston. Dados recentes indicam que a média salarial anual gira em torno de US$ 152 mil, o que equivale a cerca de US$ 12,6 mil por mês. Não há bônus por periculosidade nem pagamento de horas extras, mesmo em missões espaciais. Já o canadense Jeremy Hansen foge desse padrão. Integrante da Canadian Space Agency, ele é remunerado conforme a estrutura salarial do governo do Canadá, com valores comparáveis aos dos colegas americanos. Apesar do alto risco e da complexidade da missão, os astronautas recebem apenas uma pequena diária técnica durante o voo, já que custos como alimentação, transporte e estadia são integralmente cobertos. A remuneração individual de cada astronauta não é divulgada publicamente, variando de acordo com fatores como tempo de serviço, promoções e nível dentro da tabela GS. Ainda assim, a faixa salarial reforça um contraste curioso: mesmo em uma das missões mais ambiciosas da atualidade, os astronautas continuam sendo pagos dentro dos parâmetros tradicionais do funcionalismo público, um indicativo de que, mais do que retorno financeiro, o que os move é o peso científico e histórico de suas missões.
JAMES WEBB tweet media
Português
12
3
151
27.2K
Marcolin รีทวีตแล้ว
Monica Laredo
Monica Laredo@MonicaLaredo2·
Estima-se que a fortuna de Ali Khamenei esteja entre US$ 250 bilhões e US$ 300 bilhões. Para se ter uma ideia da dimensão desse valor, ele é cerca de três vezes maior que o orçamento estatal do Irã. Notícias do Irã
Monica Laredo tweet media
Português
39
276
531
3.4K
Marcolin รีทวีตแล้ว
Henrique Aparicio
Henrique Aparicio@06Vidotti·
ZXX
2
7
73
1.7K
Hoje no Mundo Militar
Após criticar o Papa, dizendo que “ele gosta de crimes” e que “não está fazendo um bom trabalho”, Trump publicou uma imagem gerada por IA se representando como Jesus Cristo. #hojenomundomilitar
Hoje no Mundo Militar tweet media
Português
564
73
1.8K
152.9K
Marcolin
Marcolin@marcolinx·
@hoje_no Cara! Esse cara tem que estar num hospício! Quem não vê isso?
Português
0
0
2
100
Marcolin รีทวีตแล้ว
Hoje no Mundo Militar
O Primeiro-Ministro da Polônia, Donald Tusk, dando as boas-vindas à Hungria de volta para a Europa. No telefonema que deu a Peter Magyar, Tusk disse que "estou mais feliz do que você" pela vitória. Com o fim da era Orbán, Putin perdeu o seu ativo mais valioso na Europa. Através de Orbán, Putin conseguiu atrasar ou até mesmo bloquear as ajudas financeiras e militares europeus para a Ucrânia. Magyar defende basicamente os mesmos princípios que Tusk, principalmente com relação a regras mais duras contra a imigração desenfreada, e assim como Tusk, Magyar defende o apoio europeu para a Ucrânia se defender da agressão russa.
Donald Tusk@donaldtusk

Welcome back to Europe! 🇵🇱🇭🇺

Português
31
102
2.4K
115.8K
Marcolin
Marcolin@marcolinx·
@ThayzzySmith O mundo inteiro comemorou, menos os putinistas terroristas criminosos.
Português
0
0
0
6
Conservatism And Elegance 🇺🇲
🇺🇸🇭🇺NOVO: Elon Musk está soando o alarme de que a Hungria CAIU nas mãos de Soros O primeiro-ministro de direita Viktor Orbán acaba de perder as eleições nacionais, e Alex Soros — filho de George Soros — está comemorando ELON: "A Organização Soros assumiu o controle da Hungria"
Português
11
200
741
7.2K
Diego Muguet
Diego Muguet@diegomuguetrj·
🚨 O FIM DE UMA ERA: A HUNGRIA CAIU E ELON MUSK SOLTOU O ALERTA FINAL. ​ Não é mais teoria. É oficial. O último bastião conservador da Europa Central foi entregue. Viktor Orban caiu e, como o próprio Elon Musk denunciou, a Organização Soros agora deu as cartas. Alex Soros não está apenas celebrando uma vitória eleitoral; ele está celebrando o controle de uma nação. ​O aviso de Musk é um soco no estômago de quem acha que a soberania nacional é intocável. Quando o sistema decide agir, a engenharia financeira e social atropela a vontade popular. A Hungria serviu de laboratório. Quem será o próximo? O povo vai se arrepender, mas talvez seja tarde demais. 🇭🇺🔥
Português
57
516
2K
58.1K
CAASSOO
CAASSOO@CAASSOO1·
@PyroFritz @Bertold_K @marcolinx The EU just voted for a new €660B spending bill on renewable energy. That's more than 10x what EU spent a decade ago. EUs priority is clear, to become energy independent. I give 3-5 years and Russia can FO with its gas and oil.
English
0
0
1
22
Lucas Gage
Lucas Gage@LucasGageX·
What Apollo deniers don't realize is that this video they use to try to disprove that we went to the moon actually proves it. Why? Because it's impossible to replicate the lighting, low gravity, and dust ballistics on Earth. Disagree? Then get Mr. Beast to replicate this.
English
1.1K
204
5.7K
1.6M
Marcolin รีทวีตแล้ว
Helen 🐍
Helen 🐍@oihelend·
Aqui a garota percebeu que não existe lógica na esquerda KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK
Helen 🐍 tweet media
Português
225
4K
35K
441.1K