ทวีตที่ปักหมุด
▓░𒋞 ⊓◬ƚӊi◬ᵴ 𒋞░▓
10.3K posts
▓░𒋞 ⊓◬ƚӊi◬ᵴ 𒋞░▓
@nath1as
x̿ͯͥ͂͂̓ͤ͊̀͟͏̨̙̠͇̝͔͘ę̷̢̠̼̯̝͚͓̪̥̦̝̗̰̯͉̖̓̎ͧ̈́̅ͬ̋ͯ̌͗͑̉̍̋ͤ͜͝ͅn̶̸̗̤̤̥̘̫͖̲̝ͯ̒͒ͥͬ̔̐̑ͪ͋͆̾̉ͣ̑ͭ̑ͬ͘͜͞ö́̒͊͋̽̿͒̒́𝖘𝖞𝖓𝖙𝖍𝖊𝖘𝖎𝖘 of #philosophy and #code 🏴☠️🌲
:ғʀᴏᴢᴇɴ ғɪᴇʟᴅs ᴏғ ᴀʙsᴛʀᴀᴄᴛɪᴏɴ: เข้าร่วม Nisan 2014
1.8K กำลังติดตาม1.5K ผู้ติดตาม
"If you were completely incapable of engaging a hypothetical, would you be able to answer this question?"
What would you answer this question in that hypothetical?
English
@nath1as Aristotle couldn't suplex his way out of a wet paper bag
English
Good luck talking about "how" "things" "act" without wrestling Aristotle.
English
Is there scholarship on Laruelle’s Le principe de minorité in light of the arguments in Meillassoux’s After Finitude?
English
▓░𒋞 ⊓◬ƚӊi◬ᵴ 𒋞░▓ รีทวีตแล้ว
Brassier in the introduction to Sacilotto's 'Structure and Thought' points to the same distinction Sellars makes within the transcendental imagination between propositional synthesis and non-propositional perspectival determination of intuition as Parisi does in 'Xeno-patterning'
Kitsumute@kitsumute
@EndreCserna In short, xenopatterning is an ingression of alien cognition into transcendental imagination (she works via Sellars): "patterns are not just recipes but objects that add a sort of alienness to already given rules, exposing predictive patterning to the production of image-models"
English
People on TL pretending Austria is a different thing than Germany in the same way, lets say Mexico, is.
English
@qorprate not really, its just a very basic recombination, imagination is the exact thing LLMs can't really do well, this is why they are so bad at literature
English
▓░𒋞 ⊓◬ƚӊi◬ᵴ 𒋞░▓ รีทวีตแล้ว
"Have you read the Sraffa critique to Hayek?"
DiscussingFilm@DiscussingFilm
First look at a freak in Zach Cregger's ‘RESIDENT EVIL’.
English
@michaelmiraflor if you aren't in research you aren't getting paid to think
English
Getting paid to think is peak everything. If you’re getting paid well to think, don’t take it for granted. That’s 1% of civilization type stuff. Your ancestors are proud and jealous that you’ve gotten this far.
English
@TibetanKorrigan ah I thought you were applying category theory to try and poorly interpret Hegel, I didn't think you were doing unrelated formalisms
English
@TibetanKorrigan I know how enough to know immediate application of it to Hegel means you don't understand either
English
So apparently Deleuze's Anti-Hegelianism originates from reading Jean Hyppolite's translations of Hegel -_- it makes sense now why he thought Hegel subordinated negation to identity, because Hyppolite does it, he even omits many sections and replaces it with his own commentary.
𓋼𓂀𓍊𓃠𓋼𓍊@TibetanKorrigan
“I could not stand Descartes, the dualisms and the Cogito, or Hegel, the triad and the operation of the negation,” said Deleuze, but Hegel's negation isn't abstractive, as Deleuze seems to treat it, it's determinant, it's Spinoza's “Omnis determinatio est negatio”.
English
I find it hard to read fiction.
It feels like i am being lied to.
English
@TibetanKorrigan that's exactly what I'm asking you to provide sources of
English
@TibetanKorrigan I know the basics, it's just not applicable. Do you have a paper or a reference that would argue against this types of objections?
philpapers.org/rec/PIPHAC
English
@TibetanKorrigan if dA is it neither static nor a function what is it?
Hegel 's Logic as a whole is the structure of immediacy, but particular categories are states that get mutated in a semantic self-referential process
English