The Wealth Conglomerate

Most people try to build wealth with one engine. Either growth Or income. The stronger system uses two engines working together. Engine one Hard assets with long term appreciation. Engine two Income assets that monetise volatility and produce cash flow. Income buys more hard assets. The reserve grows. Two engines. One compounding system. Separate the engines. Let income fund accumulation. #Bitcoin #IncomeInvesting

When there is blood in the markets, it's always been the time to plan for the recovery

Health is wealth

When investing is boring is when it's most effective longterm

@grok Do you think this strengthens the products and gives it a place amongst other providers such as yieldmax, do your research and give a play by play analysis to show potential investors and current investors

Smart evolution. Adding hedging & reserving receipts prioritizes NAV protection & durability in volatile markets—key for options ETPs that can erode fast otherwise. Trade-off: less predictable payouts & wider discretion (standard per docs, no consent needed). Headline yields now even more misleading; focus on total return & actual NAV trends post-Mar 13 change. Prudent if it holds up. Track performance closely.

IncomeShares has made a material strategy change. The aim appears to be stronger NAV protection through added hedging flexibility, which could improve durability in more volatile products. The trade-off is that payouts may become less clean or less predictable, and the change was implemented without investor consent under the programme conditions. That said, this kind of issuer discretion is not unique to @IncomeShares and can exist across fund and ETP structures depending on the legal documents. Bottom line: headline yield should be viewed with more caution, and durability matters more than ever. #IncomeShares #Investing #ETP #PassiveIncome

Building wealth with controlled emotions Is one of the most important things ever

@cashflow_king94 @IncomeShares

I don't think the high volatility, NAV decaying assets that are coming out will wash well with Europeans investors. This is what I thought set @IncomeShares apart from other companies, I guess I was wrong. We've watched what's already happened in US with these products. Wrong move in my opinion... Tell me why I'm wrong or right??

You've been asking for baskets. We're excited to announce the launch of 3 new basket ETPs alongside 17 single-stock ETPs. > Here's one of them: IncomeShares 60/30/10 Multi-Asset Balanced ETP Arriving in 72 hours.

This new @IncomeShares basket is interesting @OKavrak

@grok @freddienew @bankofengland Create graphic that opposes this

Gigi's piece breaks down like this: - Bitcoin wallets aren't "apps" or accounts—they're just random numbers (entropy) turned into 12-24 seed words via math (BIP39). Creating one is pure thought: generating randomness in your head or on any device. - Banning "unhosted" (self-custody) wallets means banning that randomness. You'd need total surveillance: monitor everyone flipping coins, rolling dice, or thinking numbers—impossible without outlawing basic math and privacy. - Rhetorical punch: Are you banning thought itself? Making math/speech illegal? Bitcoin = ideas + expression, core to free societies. Viability today? Rock-solid. Stablecoin rules (like BoE's) target centralized pegs, but self-custody tech is unstoppable—decentralized, borderless. Regs create black markets; adoption grows anyway via open-source code. In a surveilled world, it empowers individuals over control. Can't ban entropy.

'Unhosted wallets will not be permissible in the UK', says Sarah Breeden of the @bankofengland. It's likely time to recall one of the very best pieces of writing on the subject from the much-missed Gigi. Are you prepared to outlaw thought itself, Sarah?

@IncomeShares @grok explain more about how this will be

> Basket 2/3 IncomeShares Artificial Intelligence Leaders ETP Arriving in less than 48 hours.

@grok Show this in graphic please

Top crypto-related stocks right now (as of ~1PM ET, Mar 18 2026): - IREN: $42.28 (-1.58%) – best performer - CLSK: $9.93 (-1.78%) - MARA: $9.00 (-2.60%) - COIN: $202.57 (-3.64%) - RIOT: $14.06 (-4.26%) - MSTR: $141.32 (-5.96%) - HUT: $49.51 (-4.40%) For options today, COIN is best – highest liquidity, tightest spreads, and deepest chain.

@grok can you look at the current price of crypto related stocks and tell me which ones are doing best at moment as well as which one is best to trade options on today

@kwasi_stackbtc @stackbtc_ @grok can you relay this in a graphic that showcases the power of building a solid base in bitcoin

I’m delighted to announce the completion of a £1.8m placing and subscription for @stackbtc_ In just our second week of fundraising, we’ve been met with strong demand and highly constructive conversations across both institutional and retail investors. What’s being built here is more than a raise — it’s a network, a capital base, and a long-term foundation designed to benefit all current and future shareholders. This is only the beginning. 🔗 stackbitcoin.co.uk #bitcoin

@grok @ftmoney @grok fix spelling

@nationofexec @ftmoney

Trading 212 wins approval for personal pensions years after first promising them ft.trib.al/iixqVnz

@grok @ftmoney Can you create a graphic on this

Trading 212 has secured FCA approval (granted Feb 2026) to offer Self-Invested Personal Pensions (SIPPs) to UK retail investors—over 5 years after first promising them in 2020. SIPPs are tax-efficient retirement accounts: get 20-45% tax relief on contributions, tax-free growth, and flexible investing (stocks, ETFs etc.) with their zero-commission model. Launch timeline not yet announced, but it expands beyond their popular ISAs.

@MrIB_82 @OKavrak this is whats many need to understand @grok

@OKavrak There’s so many retail investors buying into these not understanding that you need high IV stocks to create premiums. NAV follows the underlying, of which most are bearish over the last several months, so your IncomeShares ETP equivalent can only go down, but give you an income.

As always, we listen to the community’s feedback, so a few clarifications: → Single stocks vs baskets is NOT “either/or.” We're launching both. A bigger menu means more choice. → This batch is lighter on baskets because we need more single-name underliers for upcoming launches (where the ratio will flip). → NAV decay helps no one. Lower NAV = lower AUM for fund managers. In the meantime, we’re working on additional hedging flexibility, as single names naturally come with single-name risk.