Pyres

77.5K posts

Pyres banner
Pyres

Pyres

@nonchalantly_

the things which I have seen I now can see no more

sempre penso เข้าร่วม Mayıs 2016
2.6K กำลังติดตาม3.9K ผู้ติดตาม
Pyres
Pyres@nonchalantly_·
@fangboy_xxx @JamesJouissance The fragmentary Adorno is indispensable for any sense of the possibilities of aesthetics and art criticism in the 20th century. I only say this because most of what he says about classical music more or less directly applies to the jazz that draws on the classical sources in q
English
0
0
0
40
fangboy
fangboy@fangboy_xxx·
Marry Deleuze, kill Adorno, fuck Lacan… Every day I edge closer to Guattari’s Lacanian influences in schizoanalysis & the AO papers. I loathe Adorno, all of his antifascism was worse than Guattari & his cultural commentary was disastrous. Jazz is a cheap shot but…
ÁgaPe アガペ@Cordeirojaop

10° Round: Deleuze / Adorno / Lacan

English
6
1
48
2.8K
Pyres
Pyres@nonchalantly_·
Fredric Jameson reads so widely that you almost forget that he reads selectively and that he is not a good critic
English
0
0
7
301
Pyres
Pyres@nonchalantly_·
Twitter from like 2018-2022 was genuinely the world republic of letters
English
0
0
6
194
Pyres
Pyres@nonchalantly_·
@die_rizzen Rhetoric is like that. atleast it takes itself to be. It is the same situation with the belle-lettrestic Kant and the later Kant of the Critiques
English
0
0
1
22
Pyres
Pyres@nonchalantly_·
denkbild--flash fiction--the apophthegmata of the materialist sublime
English
0
0
1
88
Pyres
Pyres@nonchalantly_·
@die_rizzen I was thinking of writing another tweet on how the phrases “inverting hegel” or “turning hegel on his head” is supposed to render unthinkable any sort of continuity in their thinking in any way. Idk why we can’t just say “the writing be like that sometimes” and move on
English
1
0
2
47
Die Rizzenschaftslehre
Die Rizzenschaftslehre@die_rizzen·
@nonchalantly_ I would say the same applies to Hegel's metaphysics. They are not Marx's but that's what we read for metaphysics. Weird trio these three.
English
1
0
3
192
Pyres
Pyres@nonchalantly_·
I hear in your coo the language of discovery
English
0
0
3
110
Pyres
Pyres@nonchalantly_·
always breaking rules. but his breaks are never breaks; they fit him so they're more like breeches
English
0
1
2
103
Pyres
Pyres@nonchalantly_·
in jameson are riffs on adorno
English
0
0
2
184
Pyres
Pyres@nonchalantly_·
nobody but adorno could single-handedly get me to believe that michael fried is not racist analogizing mahler and fauvism. nobody but adorno could single-handedly get me to keep reading fredric jameson when everything tells me not to, if only because i know that certain passages
English
1
0
5
259
Pyres
Pyres@nonchalantly_·
at the end of the day, if adorno's aesethetic are not the aesthetics of marx, they are nonetheless marx's aesthetics. if one man can do with music and literature and things what another does with general society, i applaud the latter as i applaud the former
English
1
2
12
1.5K
Pyres รีทวีตแล้ว
Yoon Kim
Yoon Kim@nicoscosc·
Adorno on Beethoven’s late style (subjectivity, rethought): “The force of subjectivity in late works is the irascible gesture with which it leaves them. It bursts them asunder, not in order to express itself but, expressionlessly, to cast off the illusion of art. (1/3)
English
1
10
88
4.6K
Pyres
Pyres@nonchalantly_·
there needs to be a comparative study that analyzes the rhetoric of DuBois' Black Reconstruction alongside Oswald Spengler and Gilberto Freyre. something like that
English
0
0
5
254
Pyres
Pyres@nonchalantly_·
@die_rizzen I have always found the desire for some deep a priori theory or conceptual object in Marx quite strange. Just read Jünger’s “The Worker” and go to bed if you want metaphysics with your milk
English
0
0
3
57
Die Rizzenschaftslehre
Die Rizzenschaftslehre@die_rizzen·
price ≈ exchange value. "value" ≈ the universal quantitative character of commodities(as in the total "value" of my assets).
English
1
1
20
462
Die Rizzenschaftslehre
Die Rizzenschaftslehre@die_rizzen·
What does "in practice" mean here? No Marx is not giving us a general principle that we can just apply to learn the price of stuff. It is the necessary condition of the universality of money(value*). Both nominalism(liquidity preference) and metalism(lol) fail.
Charles G. Koch 🏴@worst_account

1. Yes, Marx basically takes a lot of mistaken things in classical econ to their logical conclusions. 2. There isn't really a way of fleshing out "socially-necessary labor time" in a way that both (a) does the work it needs to do & (b) doesn't just abandon the LTV in practice.

English
3
2
67
3.6K
Pyres
Pyres@nonchalantly_·
My dumb obedient heart
English
0
1
3
256
Pyres
Pyres@nonchalantly_·
Nothing is more depressing than support. this is the actuality of disability
English
0
1
3
239
Pyres
Pyres@nonchalantly_·
I have always been an advocate of Zizek’s Faulknerian “let’s wait and see” praxis. I have always been a partisan of Idris Elba Thought
English
0
0
3
195
Pyres
Pyres@nonchalantly_·
what is the difference between state and nation between marx and lenin? i do not imagine it can easily be plastered onto the base/superstructure model of things
English
0
0
1
198
Pyres
Pyres@nonchalantly_·
Does nobody find it strange that sociology just sort of appeared in the 19th century and that we now just take its existence for granted? Political philosophy and psychology sufficed for centuries; “group psychology”, a political phenomenon. What happened?
English
2
0
16
1.5K

ค้นพบ

@fangboy_xxx @JamesJouissance @die_rizzen @elonmusk @BarackObama @taylorswift13 @cristiano @BillGates