Im here

i’m sorry but no woman should ever be talking about other women as damaged goods and a plague you avoid because in your mind they’re an extension of men.. it’s even more outrageous when that rhetoric comes from women that claim to be feminists and are attracted to women

the concept of two blind people flirting with each other having no idea they’re BOTH blind is elite romcom material 😭 this becker episode had me hooked so bad 😭

Holy moly never talk about her design again😭

RUMOR: Multiple leakers have detailed more information about the supposed “Ocarina of Time” remake. New information suggests it will be split into TWO $60 dollar games, one where you play as Young Link and one with Adult Link. The gameplay will be similar to “Breath of the Wild”.

In publicly available forensic analyses and offender studies, lolicon or animated fictional material rarely shows up as a prominent or defining feature in the collections of people convicted of assaulting real children. and Japan has had widespread legal availability of lolicon and similar fictional/animated material since the 1970s/1980s, with no broad ban on purely fictional depictions. Studies, including Milton Diamond and Ayako Uchiyama's 1999 analysis, show that rising pornography access (including such material) from the 1970s onward correlated with declining reported rates of sexual violence and child sexual abuse trends also seen in Denmark and other countries. This suggests easy access to fictional outlets does not drive up real offending and may even correlate with lower rates, though cultural and reporting factors play a role. If there were a tight link, we'd expect clearer, recurring patterns in those reports There's not really an argument to be had here. I don't think in the history of loli from the moment of its inception. Has there ever been anyone who has looked at it and in any way thought or felt that liking it equals you being some form of child molester, pedophile or otherwise bad, who then had an argument or had any degree of testimony or evidence presented to them where their opinion was then changed, I don't think there's literally a single one in existence, There's just one side insisting that it's bad with no actual evidence, especially not substantially, to back it up and prove a clear Causation. And then another side having to defend from these baseless attacks in the first place, despite the fact that the accuser is the one supposed to have the burden of proof. This is why I rarely engage in any discussions around this topic, because there's just no point.