hi

2.3K posts

hi banner
hi

hi

@pixelFX__

#Aifi

เข้าร่วม Eylül 2024
356 กำลังติดตาม63 ผู้ติดตาม
cvxv666
cvxv666@antpalkin·
> see how every random dude printing $100k on Polymarket with trading bots > you decide it’s your turn to build one > think you gotta quit your job, hire a squad, pay salaries and go full-time slave mode > you don’t need any of that stuff anymore > all you need is to learn how to properly direct AI tools like a boss > GPT-5-nano for research and strategy backtesting > Qwen 2.5 within Mirofish for multi-scenario market simulations > Codex + Opus 4.6 to create an MVP solution based on the work of the previous tools > boom - you just replaced a whole 5-10 person team of degreed engineers
slash1s@slash1sol

I JUST FOUND ONE OF THE MOST MIND-BENDING SOLO DEV STORIES IN THE QUANT SPACE RIGHT NOW. One dev built a fully autonomous trading bot for Polymarket optimized for micro bankrolls ($100-$500) using GPT-5-nano inside AutoResearchClaw, Qwen 2.5 inside MiroFish, and Opus 4.6 + Codex pipelines inside Antigravity. The craziest detail: the final bot runs with zero AI under the hood. It’s pure mathematics. No models, no prompts - just hard-coded logic engineered to sit in the order book 24/7 and harvest tiny spreads and inefficiencies created by other traders. He calls the architecture PICO - a solo-operator framework for small-budget prediction market trading. Here’s how he actually built it: -> Research stage: fed the basic idea into open-source AutoResearchClaw with GPT-5-nano. It produced a full academic-grade paper from scratch, complete with risk management, slippage modeling, backtesting realities, and protection against emotional trading. -> Validation: ran massive multi-agent simulations in MiroFish with Qwen 2.5. Market makers, informed whales, momentum players, noise traders and the bot itself interacted in realistic Polymarket conditions. The system proved consistent small profits under brutal real-world stress. -> Implementation: fed the finished paper plus simulation results to heavy Codex + Opus 4.6 pipelines in Antigravity. They output clean, production-ready bot code. The bot doesn’t try to predict events. It’s a relentless harvester of dust on spreads and other participants’ mistakes. Full PICO paper: drive.google.com/file/d/1dRjNNT… AutoResearchClaw framework (the exact open-source tool used for the research stage): x.com/slash1sol/stat… I’m honestly starting to feel myself dissolve watching this new reality. With nothing but a laptop and internet, the barrier to building sophisticated, validated quant systems has basically collapsed. Save this if you’re into AI-augmented building - the entire pipeline is pure template material.

English
18
7
150
16.7K
hi
hi@pixelFX__·
yep definitely not smart enough. i'll stick with @Cod3xOrg
slash1s@slash1sol

I JUST FOUND ONE OF THE MOST MIND-BENDING SOLO DEV STORIES IN THE QUANT SPACE RIGHT NOW. One dev built a fully autonomous trading bot for Polymarket optimized for micro bankrolls ($100-$500) using GPT-5-nano inside AutoResearchClaw, Qwen 2.5 inside MiroFish, and Opus 4.6 + Codex pipelines inside Antigravity. The craziest detail: the final bot runs with zero AI under the hood. It’s pure mathematics. No models, no prompts - just hard-coded logic engineered to sit in the order book 24/7 and harvest tiny spreads and inefficiencies created by other traders. He calls the architecture PICO - a solo-operator framework for small-budget prediction market trading. Here’s how he actually built it: -> Research stage: fed the basic idea into open-source AutoResearchClaw with GPT-5-nano. It produced a full academic-grade paper from scratch, complete with risk management, slippage modeling, backtesting realities, and protection against emotional trading. -> Validation: ran massive multi-agent simulations in MiroFish with Qwen 2.5. Market makers, informed whales, momentum players, noise traders and the bot itself interacted in realistic Polymarket conditions. The system proved consistent small profits under brutal real-world stress. -> Implementation: fed the finished paper plus simulation results to heavy Codex + Opus 4.6 pipelines in Antigravity. They output clean, production-ready bot code. The bot doesn’t try to predict events. It’s a relentless harvester of dust on spreads and other participants’ mistakes. Full PICO paper: drive.google.com/file/d/1dRjNNT… AutoResearchClaw framework (the exact open-source tool used for the research stage): x.com/slash1sol/stat… I’m honestly starting to feel myself dissolve watching this new reality. With nothing but a laptop and internet, the barrier to building sophisticated, validated quant systems has basically collapsed. Save this if you’re into AI-augmented building - the entire pipeline is pure template material.

English
0
0
0
0
se
se@seyong·
agentic payments make sense to me. agentic trading does not tbh
English
73
5
181
13.1K
hi
hi@pixelFX__·
7/ AI in finance today is mostly static. This is different. A system that gets better from its own usage. because this space is so new, whoever builds the strongest learning loop early… likely builds the moat.
English
0
0
0
6
hi
hi@pixelFX__·
6/ And that creates the loop: → strategies run → trades filtered/executed → outcomes recorded → models improve → trade selection improves → users perform better → more usage
English
1
0
0
7
hi
hi@pixelFX__·
1/ Using LLM in finance is still very early and @Cod3xOrg is leading. Most of what exists today is just prediction wrapped in UI. What’s emerging next is different — systems that learn from execution itself.
English
1
1
1
78
hi
hi@pixelFX__·
Most losses don’t come from bad ideas. They come from bad execution.
English
0
0
0
4
hi
hi@pixelFX__·
What Cod3x does: → You come up with the strategy → Cod3x ai sharpens the trade idea → the execution engine stress-tests the setup Is the chart clean? Is there volume? Is the market regime right? (trend vs range) If the conditions don’t align — the trade doesn’t pass.
English
1
0
1
14
hi
hi@pixelFX__·
1/ the future of trading with @Cod3xOrg Execution engines are one of the most misunderstood parts of trading. Most people focus on finding good trades — signals, indicators, predictions. But that’s not where most of the edge comes from. Execution is.
English
1
0
0
11
hi รีทวีตแล้ว
hi
hi@pixelFX__·
you just avoid the bad trades. The edge isn’t more trades. It’s better ones. Low-frequency + high-quality decisions = durable PnL.
English
0
0
0
8
hi
hi@pixelFX__·
but didn’t actually have the structure to capture the move cleanly. What @Cod3xOrg is doing makes this clearer: → a prop-style execution engine → AI reasoning filtering trades in real time So instead of trying to be right more often…
English
1
0
0
8
hi
hi@pixelFX__·
Understanding the future of trading with @Cod3xOrg Something that’s been clicking for me recently about agentic trading: It’s not really about predicting the market. It’s about executing ideas properly. I keep thinking about how many times I’ve had a good trade idea —
English
1
1
2
38