Patrick Meyer

@MattWalshBlog I don’t think you are speaking from true facts. Nonetheless violence against anyone for anything is wrong. I don’t think any side is any better than the other. All sides have their issues and need to just stop.

BLM riots Antifa Church shootings Trump assassination attempt Charlie Kirk assassination Pro life pregnancy center fires Tesla vandalism Attacks against ICE agents Attacks against police Attacks against federal courthouses This is merely a partial list. Nearly ALL of the politically motivated violence in America is committed by one side. This is not a both sides thing. This is a one side thing.

@andrewmcrostie @LMusson17997 @atensnut But not outside of the workplace and unless their written business conduct guidelines specifically state so

@LMusson17997 @atensnut First Amendment only protects you from the government. Private businesses can terminate you for professionalism.

Good riddance. 🔥 🔥 🔥

@Sean46501 @LMusson17997 @atensnut I disagree. Employers should not have the right to prevent or dictate what free speech means and/or is. I don’t condone wishing violence upon anyone but you should not be fired for expressing your personal point of view outside the workplace on non-company platforms.

@LMusson17997 @atensnut Nope you can say what you want 💯, but there are sometimes consequences for the things you say. It speaks to your character and how you carry yourself. Employers have every right to decide if that persons words go against what the employer stands for.

@SnayburtJames @badhombre So you agree that those who spread hatred, bias, violence, retribution etc. against black and brown people should also be held accountable. Just trying to understand because to me both sides have people wh promoted, insist, and condone violence not just the side you don’t like

@badhombre She didn’t have to mourn or like Charlie Kirk. That is what so many liberals don’t understand. The issue is their promotion and endorsement of violence and murder against those with whom they disagree.

JUST IN: The Washington Post has fired race hustler Karen Attiah.

@idahocountrydoc @badhombre I hope you are referring to the sexist, misogynistic, racially insensitive and bias bigoted people not those who have had to push back and fight for everything just to be heard and appreciated for their efforts to provide value (economically or otherwise)

@badhombre So, I'm now wondering at how many companies are grateful now to have "cause" to fire consistently painful/toxic personalities in their workforce? People who they had to tolerate for fear of a lawsuit if they were fired before?

The McKinsey Institute for Economic Mobility maps the US affordable housing crisis and explores opportunities to unlock economic mobility and secure rising living standards for all. Find your county- and state-level breakdowns in the interactive.

Job alert! Apple is hiring for its Answers team working on ChatGPT-style AI: Who all can apply? startupnews.fyi/2025/08/04/job…

McKinsey Technology Trends Outlook 2025 mck.co/3BQh98t

Don’t delegate the AI revolution: A conversation with Sanofi CEO Paul Hudson in McKinsey Quarterly mck.co/44LTFju

Banking on gen AI in the credit business: The route to value creation mck.co/3IafW1q

Scaling gen AI in banking: Choosing the best operating model mck.co/3IKKeVE

Deploying AI at speed and scale: Talking with ING’s Marnix van Stiphout mck.co/40o7hyB

@JDVance No it is not a win for the average American it is only a win for the super rich and extremely harmful to everyone else.

Massive tax cuts, especially no tax on tips and overtime. And most importantly, big money for border security. This is a big win for the American people.

@SenTedBuddNC I am not a DEM nor GOP, but you need to stop lying and stop spreading misinformation. People you are speaking to are not stupid and gullible. You want to save tax payers money tax the rich pay more taxes. Stop screwing with the very people you were sent there to protect.

Democrats are relentlessly spreading misinformation about our efforts to preserve & protect Medicaid. The facts aren't on their side. Nobody is cutting Medicaid. We're making it sustainable for those it was originally intended for. I'll explain here🧵:

Homeownership remains out of reach for many. What will it take to change that? mck.co/3ZhjJQf via @McKinsey

@StephenM You are a liar and a racist.

I’ve seen a few claims making the rounds on the Big Beautiful Bill that require correction. The first is that it doesn’t “codify the DOGE cuts.” A reconciliation bill, which is a budget bill that passes with 50 votes, is limited by senate rules to “mandatory” spending only — eg Medicaid and Food Stamps. The senate rules prevent it from cutting “discretionary” spending — eg the Department of Education or federal grants. The DOGE cuts are overwhelmingly discretionary, not mandatory. The bill saves more than 1.6 TRILLION in mandatory spending, including the largest-ever welfare reform. A remarkable achievement. I’ve also seen claims the bill increases the deficit. This lie is based on a CBO accounting gimmick. Income tax rates from the 2017 tax cut are set to expire in September. They were always planned to be permanent. CBO says maintaining *current* rates adds to the deficit, but by definition leaving these income tax rates unchanged cannot add one penny to the deficit. The bill’s spending cuts REDUCE the deficit against the current law baseline, which is the only correct baseline to use. Another fantastically false claim is that the bill spends trillions of dollars. This is just completely invented out of whole cloth. This is not a ten year budget bill—it doesn’t “fund” almost any operations of government, which are funded in the annual budget bills (which this is not). In other words, if this bill passed, but the annual budget bill did not, there would be no government funding. Under the math that critics are using, if we passed a one paragraph reconciliation bill that cut simply 50 billion in food stamp spending, they would say the bill “added” trillions in spending and debt because they are counting ALL the projected federal spending that exists entirely outside the scope of this legislation, which is of course preposterous. The only funding in the bill is for the President’s border and defense priorities, while enacting a net spending cut of over 1.6 TRILLION dollars. The bill has two fiscal components: a massive tax cut and a massive spending cut.

@SpeakerJohnson You and your a*hole colleagues are liars and think the American people are stupid. How about cutting your salary and expenditures and that would be truly eliminating waste and fraud.

Let me be clear: we are NOT cutting Medicaid. We are STRENGTHENING the program for the American citizens who need and deserve it.   As President Trump has said, we are eliminating waste, fraud, and abuse by STOPPING 1.4 million illegal aliens from stealing coverage and 4.8 million adults who are able to work but refuse to from gaming the system.   We have to preserve resources for America’s most vulnerable like pregnant women, single parents, low-income seniors, and the disabled.

@CharlieK_news Absolutely NO. She did not do anything wrong and the government is abusing its powers. This is pure harassment by a a*hole.

YES or NO?

I wanted to say everyone owes a debt of gratitude to the heroic men and valiant women in the service of our country which can never be repaid. As a Vet, I truly believe they have earned our undying gratitude. America should never forget their sacrifices. 📷