Sapiens

Amigos estou voltando a ativa nesse perfil. Se puder me segue! ✅️ Vem muita coisa boa 😁

Perfeito comentário meu amigo... Principalmente a parte que você fala que seres humanos normais falam de assuntos diversos... Meu perfil posta de tudo... estou sendo severamente punido por isso... Que estão fazendo com X é um absurdo... Concordo, que contas que só postam vídeos aleatoriamente devam ser suprimidas... mas queimaram a floresta para resolver o problema de algumas árvores

The X algorithm is broken, and it's killing the platform from the inside out. It's gotten measurably worse, and it now barely registers something as fundamental as how many people chose to follow you. Small accounts can't grow organically. Large accounts watch their reach collapse month over month. Post too much and you're throttled. Post too little and you're forgotten. There is no winning move because the system isn't designed for anyone to win. It's designed to keep everyone anxious, posting more, and dependent on whatever the model decided that morning. I'm personally down 95% from a year ago. Ninety-five percent. I get more views and replies on Instagram with 20,000 followers than I do here with a following many multiples of that. Every serious creator, journalist, and news account I know is reporting the same collapse. This isn't a handful of cranks complaining but a structural failure visible in the numbers across the entire creator class. The damage runs deeper than impressions. The algorithm has quietly redefined what kind of person you're allowed to be on this platform. If you stay relentlessly inside one "niche," you get rewarded. If you post like an actual human being with multiple interests — politics, tech, gaming, culture, memes — you get punished. The system literally works against diversity of thought, which is supposed to be the entire point of a town square. It funnels everyone into narrower and narrower lanes until creators stop being people and start being content categories. The user experience is just as broken as the creator experience. Imagine subscribing to a dozen tech and science channels on YouTube and being shown unrelated slop instead. That's the For You feed now. Most of the accounts on my timeline are random accounts I never asked to see, while the people I actually chose to follow get buried. The "systems-first" approach the team is so proud of has turned a social network into a slot machine and the engagement numbers everyone is whispering about in group chats prove the experiment isn't working. Here's the part nobody at X seems willing to say out loud: followers used to be social capital, and the algorithm has retroactively devalued every account on the platform. All of us, aside from the legacy celebrities who arrived with audiences pre-built, clawed our way up from zero. We posted through the woke years, the bot waves, the policy changes, the verification chaos. We built something. And then one day a model decided our followers don't really count anymore. Treating creators this way is the digital equivalent of how communist regimes treat entrepreneurs: confiscate the value they built, redistribute it to whoever the central planner prefers this week, and call it fairness. It also makes no business sense. Creators are not a cost center on this platform — we are the platform. The reason anyone opens the app is because someone they want to hear from is here. When you suppress that signal in favor of algorithmic guesses, you don't just hurt creators — you train users to leave. People are already migrating their best work to Substack, Instagram, YouTube, and TikTok, where follower relationships still mean something. X is speedrunning the same mistake every dying platform makes: confusing engagement metrics with actual loyalty. The fix isn't complicated: Give us back a real Following feed that respects the explicit choice users made when they hit the follow button. Let the For You tab handle discovery — that's its job — but stop overriding the social graph people built deliberately. Make follower count weight something meaningful again. Stop punishing topical range. Stop boosting unverified randoms over accounts users have actively opted into. And stop pretending an opaque ranking model is more legitimate than the user's own stated preferences. X is supposed to be the free speech platform. But suppression by algorithm is still suppression — it just has better PR. If the team is serious about this being a town square, the people who showed up and built it deserve to actually be heard by the audiences they earned. Fix the algorithm. Give followers back their meaning. Let creators be human again.

@nikitabier @BoredElonMusk @grok O que é alto volume? 10, 20, 100? Sejam mais transparentes

I really want to close down that use-case, because Grok simply doesn’t have enough data to actually explain reach per account. But in almost all cases when people complain about reach, it’s either: • Author diversity mechanism (high volume of posts in a short time period, leading to lower reach on their last post) • Inactivity for an extended period of time (algorithm has no recent signal on people’s preferences about you) • Just bad content

Wow @grok does an excellent job of analyzing the health of your X account and what may or may not be hurting your reach. Not sure when this change was implemented but huge improvement in terms of xAI being able to analyze its own data. Good work @nikitabier

Uma das fotos mais impactantes da história! Um menino japonês carrega o corpo do irmão morto até um cemitério, símbolo do impacto devastador da guerra sobre civis — especialmente crianças.

Darwin win!

Uma incrível ideia para matar moscas!

In 1989, Ronald Reagan underwent cranial surgery after being thrown from a horse, requiring part of his head to be shaved for the procedure—this photo shows him afterward, removing his cap to reassure Americans of his recovery.

Uma foto trágica de 1954. Um casal descobre que seu filho de quase dois anos foi levado pelo mar por uma onda. A foto ganhou o Prêmio Pulitzer em 1955.

@fiscaldofim @unkonfined @Starcobaba Exactly

Quando eles forem mais transparentes. Quando eles pararem de mentir falando que você deve focar em um nicho e criar seu conteúdo. E na verdade, você faz isso e não tem impulsionamento nenhum do algoritmo. Quando eles pararem de ficarem mudando regras a cada quinzena Quando eles pararem de dar DE BUFF em posts que viralizaram. Enfim quando eles começarem a jogar limpo! @nikitabier

When will you start making money on 𝕏?

King Amanullah Khan of Afghanistan, who ruled from 1919 to 1929, once declared in a public speech that Islam did not require women to cover their bodies or wear a specific veil. At the end of the speech, Queen Soraya dramatically removed her veil in public.

Chinese Catholics stand ready to defend their church from Boxer forces during the Boxer Rebellion in 1899.

Em 16 de março de 1891, 2 dias após os linchamentos de 11 italianos em Nova Orleans, o futuro presidente Theodore Roosevelt jantaria com diplomatas italianos "todos muito agitados pelo linchamento". Roosevelt escreveu que achava que era uma "boa coisa" e "disse isso"

Mecca in 1953 and 2025: A 72-Year Comparison

Em 6 de março de 1981, a mãe Marianne Bachmeier contrabandeou uma pistola Beretta 70 para dentro de um tribunal e atirou e matou Klaus Grabowski durante seu julgamento pelo estuprar e assassinar sua filha de 7 anos, Anna, que foi morta em 1980. Ela disparou 7 tiros, dizendo "Eu fiz isso por você, Anna."

Em 11 de maio de 1932, Robert H. Edsall e Nigel M. Henton caíram para a morte depois de não conseguirem segurar uma corda presa ao dirigível USS Akron. "Bud" Cowart, o terceiro homem segurando a corda, aguentou por uma hora até conseguir chegar a um lugar seguro.

Josef M. era um excêntrico tcheco que viveu sozinho em um castelo em ruínas do século XIII, se apresentando como “Sir Josef” para a alegria das crianças locais. Quando os tanques nazistas se aproximaram de seu castelo em 1938, Sir Josef vestiu uma armadura completa, pegou sua espada e lança, e cavalgou para encontrá-los em batalha.

Os sonhos são experiências incríveis. Nosso cérebro a mistura cenas que já vivemos com muita criatividade de cenas que jamais iremos viver. Eu nunca passou por isso ⬇️?

Laika, the first dog in space. No provisions were made for her return, and she died there, 1957

G-Shock é submerso em água sob alta pressão (simulando até 200 m) para testar a vedação sob testes de clicks. Se não entra água mesmo com pressão e variações de temperatura, o relógio está aprovado.

O segredo dos arcos romanos! O sistema de arco usa pedras encaixadas que trabalham em compressão. O peso é distribuído para os lados, travando a estrutura e garantindo grande resistência mesmo sem cimento ou aço. Os romanos levaram a técnica dos arcos ao máximo, usando em pontes, aquedutos e construções monumentais — muitas ainda existem hoje. Embora outros povos já utilizassem arcos antes, foram os romanos que aperfeiçoaram e espalharam essa engenharia pelo mundo