Frank DeMarco

@HardcoreCook37 @marten_sorby @SirSicCrusader Says the person who still can’t explain the difference

@scovaFD @marten_sorby @SirSicCrusader You're incapable of forming a coherent thought, it's incredible.

While people absolutely do talk about how satan is just as fake and dumb, what exactly is the need to criticise the one who's SUPPOSED to be evil, instead of the one who people claim isn't?

@TheDailyHPotter I’m sure he’s a fine actor. He’s not Snaoe and shouldn’t have been casted.

A controversial take but we like both the Snape actors 🖤

@HardcoreCook37 @marten_sorby @SirSicCrusader Why is it that the atheist can’t ever explain their nonsense? Instead, when they know they have no argument, they resort to name calling and lashing out? I’m the 5 year old and yet you have the potty mouth of an immature pubescent boy. Hmm… They’re the same thing btw

@scovaFD @marten_sorby @SirSicCrusader You sound like a fucking moron. Your rebuttal is to give me a sermon. They aren't the same thing, they sound similar because the English language is complicated and you have the same understanding of it as a god damn 5 year old. Pathetic.

@HardcoreCook37 @marten_sorby @SirSicCrusader They sound similar because they’re the exact same thing However, deep down in the heart of the atheist, God calls you and you do know His voice. You suppress His voice, and cling to the idea of wanting to hate Him, and then go and play semantic word games around His existence

@scovaFD @marten_sorby @SirSicCrusader It isn't, there's a massive difference between the two. Once again you repeat the error here. Believing there are no gods is not the same as not believing there are gods. It sounds similar but if you took grammar in the 2nd grade you'll understand the distinction.

@marten_sorby @HardcoreCook37 @SirSicCrusader Unicorns could have existed at some point or God could choose to make unicorns exist so yes, I believe the idea of a unicorn could exist in some shape or form. Anything logical is possible with God and if God chose to create a unicorn, He could.

@scovaFD @HardcoreCook37 @SirSicCrusader Meanwhile you claim atheists "hate god". How do you hate something you do not believe exists? Also: You're AGNOSTIC on unicorns? So... you think unicorns MIGHT exist?

@marten_sorby @SirSicCrusader 2/2 - why can’t matter be the eternal thing? Matter can’t apply agency unto itself and would be dormant for all eternity if not for a conscious mind to guide it. God is the spirit that brings order from chaos. God is the very essence that binds and sustains all things

@marten_sorby @SirSicCrusader 1/2 - Logically there must be something that has always been eternal for anything to exist at all. The actual argument is that only things that begin to exist need created and need a cause. God never began, but His eternal nature is a prerequisite necessity for anything to happen

@Maximumatheist The man with the highest IQ alive today believes in God btw Just tossing that fun fact out there

Think about it.. your IQ has to be pretty low to be convinced there’s a magic being in the sky that will torture you for all eternity if you touch your naughty bits. And ironically it also needs your money.

@HardcoreCook37 @marten_sorby @SirSicCrusader A disbelief in God and saying no God exists is pretty much the exact same thing. Atheists believe there is absolutely no gods or God. Really weird game y’all are trying to pull

@scovaFD @marten_sorby @SirSicCrusader First it was "atheism is affirming that no gods exist" and now you're saying "atheism is a disbelief in gods" those are not the same thing. Lack of belief in gods and belief that there are no gods are separate things. Which one is it dude?

@marten_sorby @HardcoreCook37 @SirSicCrusader Atheist - noun - a person who does not believe in the existence of God or any gods I understand the definition just fine. You’re the one who’s confusing atheism with agnostic, which is someone who says they don’t know if God or Gods exist and so they don’t believe.

@scovaFD @HardcoreCook37 @SirSicCrusader So your problem is you don't understand the meaning of the word 'atheism'. Well, that cuts this discussion down pretty quickly and makes it a lot less interesting.

@marten_sorby @SirSicCrusader And so once you’ve lost the argument, you resort to name calling and cursing. I suppose there’s nothing wrong with being that way since morals aren’t a real thing for you. Yet I’m the one who’s “sad.” GG’s brother, you done played yourself 👌

@scovaFD @SirSicCrusader There is no such thing as an "atheistic world view" (you wrote "athletic" btw you fucking idiot). We've been explaining it to you, but you just don't seem to want to learn. You don't understand the meaning of words like "atheist" or "objective", you're just... sad.

@marten_sorby @SirSicCrusader So without God, explain how anything can come into existence at all. God is the necessary being for all things to be. Without an eternal and all powerful being, nothing would have ever happened and nothing is all there’d be

@scovaFD @SirSicCrusader "You just don't want to submit to God" it is physically impossible for me to do so. God is not a real thing. He is literally fictional. You may as well be asking me to submit to Spider-man. Spider-man has more written about his powers, and has a better moral character, at that.

@marten_sorby @SirSicCrusader No in the athletic world view, morals are subjective. In the theist world view, morals are objective as they’re tied directly to Gods nature, which is objective in and of itself. You just don’t want to submit to God and so you trying and create circular arguments with dead ends

@scovaFD @SirSicCrusader Again, that's not actually an argument or a reason, it's just asserting something without proof or even a logical throughline. Even within theistic belief, god's morality isn't objective, but subjective. And in the real world, it's a subjective morality invented by men.

@marten_sorby @HardcoreCook37 @SirSicCrusader Yes, which would mean I’m agnostic on the unicorn discussion. Since I don’t be believe or disbelieve, I’d be agnostic. This isn’t rocket science bro. Why do atheists love to hate God until it comes to outright denying God? Almost as if something inside is speaking to them

@scovaFD @HardcoreCook37 @SirSicCrusader Disbelief is an absence of belief, yes. It's not a belief in anything. It's merely the absence of one specific belief. Do you believe in unicorns? Probably not, right? That doesn't mean you have an "anti-unicorn belief". It means unicorns just aren't a thing you believe in.

@marten_sorby @SirSicCrusader The reason is that God is God. That’s actually the only reason needed. Again… God is eternal and is the one who declares quite literally all things. Since God knows all and declares all, His nature is law and order. It is He who makes truth known. God isn’t a finite being

@scovaFD @SirSicCrusader "God's words are objective because he is god" is circular reasoning at best and at its face, idiotic. If you can't give an actual reason, then god's words are just that. Words. If god is a person, his beliefs are just opinions, and worth only the value WE give them.

@HardcoreCook37 @marten_sorby @SirSicCrusader I’m not the one deciding, the definition of atheism is the one deciding and the definition of atheism is literally the disbelief of gods or God. Definitions matter for a reason. If you hold the stance that “you don’t know” then you’re agnostic not atheist

@scovaFD @marten_sorby @SirSicCrusader Not exactly. That's the most common philosophical definition, but since language is descriptive, the "lack of belief" position is probably the most common definition of atheism in the modern age. Both are valid, you don't get to decide for someone which one applies to them.

@marten_sorby @SirSicCrusader What makes Gods word objective? The fact that God is the singular eternal being that all things stem from. You couldn’t know truth apart from God since all things come from God. It’s not authoritarianism, it’s having humility before the single eternal source of all things

@scovaFD @SirSicCrusader "God is the objective being" why? What makes god's opinions more objective than mine? You can't just declare objectivity, and rule by decree does not make something correct, true, or even right. It's just authoritarianism by the rule of force.

@marten_sorby @HardcoreCook37 @SirSicCrusader Atheism by definition is the belief that there isn’t any gods or God. It is a set belief, but you do you

@HardcoreCook37 @scovaFD @SirSicCrusader The fact that atheism isn't a set of beliefs at all is something a lot of theists, especially apologists, struggle with. They'll say "atheists believe X, Y, Z" when atheism is just the lack of one specific belief, not an a shared ideology of any sort.

@marten_sorby @SirSicCrusader No because God is the objective eternal being that is the singular being that knows and decrees all things. He has no beginning nor end. When God decrees something, what God decrees is objective eternal truth.

@scovaFD @SirSicCrusader There can be no true objective arbiter of good and evil, because even if a theistic god existed, his decrees on what is good and evil would be his subjective opinion.

@criticalkush1 @Thedrivenman “The universe” but not your fairytale lol

Real men sit in the dark and ask the other fairytale (devil) you believe in to attack them (send your demons coward). I did this in Afghanistan, naked and ready to fucking go. Guess what bitches nothing happened then either it’s all fucking fake and gay. The universe responds not your god damn fairytales

Every man has had this conversation with God at least once in their life