ふゆ

409 posts

ふゆ

ふゆ

@study_h_u

高一 物化世 uts1

เข้าร่วม Haziran 2025
641 กำลังติดตาม236 ผู้ติดตาม
ふゆ รีทวีตแล้ว
あねまめ
あねまめ@Anemame2021·
開示だな
あねまめ tweet media
日本語
3
27
678
116.6K
ふゆ
ふゆ@study_h_u·
@reading_gain 温玉さんの昨日のツイート思い出して平方完成してから因数分解したけどん?ってなってそのあと平方数で挟みました。
日本語
1
0
0
135
ふゆ
ふゆ@study_h_u·
東大物理に繋がるかな
Gnit(ニット)- 東大生の物理学習@gnit_me

親愛なるGniterへ。 Gnit Sunday Open 003 (#GSO003) 開催決定! 物理オリンピックを目指す中高生から、物理を究める社会人まで。簡単な問題も出題されるので、もちろん初心者歓迎。 ご友人を誘って、日曜日の夜を物理で楽しもう! 📅開催日時: 4/5(日)19:30~21:00 👇エントリーはリプから

日本語
1
1
5
902
ふゆ รีทวีตแล้ว
Mikiya Takahashi (高橋幹弥)
今年度から担当する4年生向けの「宇宙物理学入門」では、「大学一年生のための宇宙物理学入門」と題して、誰でも見られるノートを作っています。 講義が進むとともに頑張って追記していこうと思います(頑張れ)。どなたでもご自由に見てお役立てください! @mikiya/HJPQyg7OZl" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">hackmd.io/@mikiya/HJPQyg…
日本語
0
58
326
15.8K
ふゆ รีทวีตแล้ว
Gnit(ニット)- 東大生の物理学習
親愛なるGniterへ。 Gnit Sunday Open 003 (#GSO003) 開催決定! 物理オリンピックを目指す中高生から、物理を究める社会人まで。簡単な問題も出題されるので、もちろん初心者歓迎。 ご友人を誘って、日曜日の夜を物理で楽しもう! 📅開催日時: 4/5(日)19:30~21:00 👇エントリーはリプから
Gnit(ニット)- 東大生の物理学習 tweet media
日本語
1
12
32
10.4K
ふゆ
ふゆ@study_h_u·
@reading_gain 流石です👏 これからもツイート楽しみにしてます。
日本語
0
0
0
104
三宮の斉藤オカズなり
@study_h_u もちろん全て独学です そもそもこのレベルの思想の話をする人はそういない気がします😆
日本語
1
0
1
157
ふゆ รีทวีตแล้ว
宮
@Studyholic5·
東大文系数学のセットもできたので公開します。 #自作模試 #自作問題 #宮問
宮 tweet media宮 tweet media
日本語
0
19
129
13.8K
ふゆ
ふゆ@study_h_u·
@reading_gain 凄いです。 独学でこれらまた他分野の思想を言語化?したのですか?
日本語
1
0
0
123
ふゆ
ふゆ@study_h_u·
なんで内部進学ってバカにされてるんですか?
日本語
0
0
2
136
ふゆ
ふゆ@study_h_u·
字を綺麗に書くのが大事なのか
日本語
0
0
2
135
ふゆ รีทวีตแล้ว
Phi001
Phi001@Phiasdf·
対戦ありがとうございました
Phi001 tweet media
日本語
89
460
9.3K
2.1M
ふゆ
ふゆ@study_h_u·
@drwawawaa ありがとうございます。 それと配慮足りず申し訳ない
日本語
0
0
1
23
dr
dr@drwawawaa·
@study_h_u yes(ネタバレのため消してくれると嬉しいです)
日本語
1
0
1
49
dr
dr@drwawawaa·
2027東大理系数学予想問題(ただし作問者が🤡化した世界線)を放流
dr tweet mediadr tweet mediadr tweet mediadr tweet media
日本語
9
34
383
84.7K
ふゆ
ふゆ@study_h_u·
@nanimokangaei 教えてくれてありがとうございます!
日本語
1
0
1
41
ふゆ
ふゆ@study_h_u·
@nanimokangaei やっぱり毎年変わってるんですね とりあえず2023の買います
日本語
1
0
1
46
ふゆ
ふゆ@study_h_u·
化学発展講座問題集2023ならセーフ?もっと新しい方がいいですか?
日本語
1
0
1
339
ふゆ รีทวีตแล้ว
Ihtesham Ali
Ihtesham Ali@ihtesham2005·
A Harvard professor who has written 9 books and spent 40 years studying how language works inside the human brain just gave the most important writing masterclass I've ever seen. Here's what he said that broke my entire understanding of writing. Steven Pinker, the professor, opened with a single question: why is so much writing terrible? Not just academic writing, but corporate writing, government writing, and even most blog posts. His answer had nothing to do with effort or intelligence. He called it the Curse of Knowledge. The moment you understand something deeply, you lose the ability to remember what it felt like not to know it. You stop seeing your own blind spots because the blind spots feel like common ground. He watched a brilliant molecular biologist destroy a room of 400 people at a TED event. The man launched straight into jargon without ever explaining the problem he was solving or why anyone should care. The biologist had no idea it was happening. That's the curse. Then he said something I haven't stopped thinking about. Bad writing is not a character flaw. It's a failure of empathy. You cannot get inside your reader's head by trying harder. You have to actually find a real human being and watch them read your words in real time. He showed his drafts to his mother. Not because she was unsophisticated, but because she wasn't a cognitive psychologist. She was smart, well-read, and completely outside his world. When she lost the thread, he knew something was wrong. The second thing he said changed how I think about every sentence I write. Language is a delivery system, not the destination. What your reader actually understands is not the words. It is the image, the sensation, the concrete thing those words are supposed to summon. If your reader cannot picture it, they have not understood it. He asked: what is a paradigm? What does a framework look like? What color is a concept? Nobody could answer. Because abstractions produce nothing in the mind's eye. The writers from two centuries ago who still feel alive today were forced to think visually because they had no abstractions to hide behind. They had to say the spirit of the hawk tore into our flesh instead of aggression. The image did the work that the jargon could not. The third thing he said was the one most people ignore completely. Brevity is not about word count. It is about removing every word that makes the reader work harder without rewarding them for it. He quoted a line he had memorized for 40 years: omit needless words. Three words. An instruction that is also an example of itself. He said the best thing that ever happened to his writing was editors who gave him an 800-word limit and wouldn't budge. The constraint always improved the piece. Always. The curse of knowledge is real. The fix is simple and most people never do it. Find one person outside your world. Show them what you wrote. Watch their face, not the page.
Ihtesham Ali tweet media
English
60
625
3.5K
457.7K
ふゆ
ふゆ@study_h_u·
1人目になるしかない
日本語
0
0
1
511