
Ted Chen
95 posts

Ted Chen
@tedchenCPC
Founder of @CarnegieParkCap, Sponsor of @TLGYAcq, and Co-Founder of @Stablecoin_X


FX is the world's largest market. Stablecoins are changing the way money is moved. FX will be disrupted next, and is now coming on chain with Codex.



USDe on @WalletConnect Pay. This will allow merchants and platforms building on their wallet infrastructure to offer USDe payments at checkout.


Common misunderstanding about $USDe risk profile is whether you are getting the appropriate return when sUSDe APY is down at today’s levels.


I'm still thinking about this tweet. Excited to see what they're cooking.

It's official. TLGY shareholders have approved the business combination with approximately 97% of votes cast in favor. StablecoinX Inc. will be listed on Nasdaq under the ticker $USDe upon closing. Stay tuned for updates as we work to complete the transaction. Article: globenewswire.com/news-release/2…






I haven't commented mentioned USDe at any point but to address here-- Synthetic dollars are on a spectrum of how much hidden risk they are taking, and how well they are being run. USDe obviously is on the end of the spectrum where its well run and has fewer (tho definitely nowhere near zero) risks. But it also paid out a lot lower return than the riskier ones that just blew up this week. If the backing of the tokenized dollar isn't its native substrate, ie in a version of a custodied fiat holding of the issuing government's direct instrument, theres risks being taken -- Theoretically there's an efficient frontier of Risk x Reward that the market oscillated towards, say- 1x per decade 'grey swan' risk pays treasury+2% 1x per 4 years 'grey swan' risk pays treasury +5% 1x per year 'grey swan' risk pays treasury + 15% Obviously these are just to illustrate the shape of the frontier curve, not specific numbers. When it comes to USDe since I'm being asked if its a reasonable comparison to xUSD and deUSD etc- It's a lower risk lower yield part of the same curve. Great BD and execution has arguably made it historically return quite higher than its risk premium would have implied, clearly gdog = gbeast. But lets not pretend USDe wouldnt be impaired if eg a major exchange fully blew up. Even if the assets used to trade on it would be safe in 3rd party, the upnl wouldn't be. So bottom line, hope nothing ever goes wrong with USDe and so far so good- but forever is a long time for nothing to go wrong-- and when competitors start putting pressure by paying higher yields without blowing up for x-period of time, its pressure to add risk to catchup on yield. Probably good idea to focus on having a larger insurance fund as % of assets for a cushion instead of doing token buybacks, but I understand theres a lot of parameters at play with token prices. There will always be new and different approaches to tokenized yield products, as an industry I would like to avoid systemic risks of hardcoding yield funds as = $1, even if they are on the lower risk side of the spectrum. This week showed us what can go wrong, hopefully the lessons from $100m are learnt and it was a good thing things didn't grow to much larger before it was demonstrated in live. Much respect as always.

