celtic photon

@GarrickKingston @drphilhammond Tell me you have no medical knowledge without telling me !

@drphilhammond Shoo Lee's pub quiz team produced a glossy brochure advertising Letby's innocence. Actually delivering on that promise during a trial is a different task. They might have muddied the waters enough for a few more no verdicts, but would have been cut to shreds by cross-examination.

Why Lucy Letby is extremely unlikely to be granted an appeal, no matter how many experts review all the notes and trial records, and find no evidence of deliberate harm. If you couldn’t find the right defence experts first time around, it’s just bad luck. observer.co.uk/opinion-and-id…

@BigTed360 @Michelehal7344 @MartynPitman @LucyLetbyTrials You make a v important point - two ward rounds a week on NNICU gives an insight into how inadequate the care was. A subtle well made point 💯🎯

@Michelehal7344 @MartynPitman @LucyLetbyTrials What about if Brearey et al were not on the unit when 7 babies suddenly died and another 7 suddenly collapsed?

Cheshire police have put out a statement, saying those pointing to failures in their Lucy Letby investigation are "attempting to destroy reputations," and "risk undermining public confidence" in Letby's convictions, as well as the entire justice system. bordertelegraph.com/news/national/…

@saintant @drphilhammond @ccrcupdate @NeoDoc11 The time is approaching when you will realise you’ll need to delete your account and acknowledge to yourself you just didn’t grasp and understand all this ….and then you will be ok👌

@drphilhammond @ccrcupdate @NeoDoc11 Continually showing morals mean nothing if you can milk this conspiracy for even longer ......without any tangible/credible new evidence and recycling old redundant theories

Having reviewed all the clinical records as an instructed expert for Lucy Letby’s @ccrcupdate application, @NeoDoc11 is certain Lucy Letby is innocent and is prepared to go on record, at significant personal risk, to explain why. youtu.be/0El-GZpK58U?si…

@noBWrexit @AGK666726 @m1chaelbarnes @drphilhammond Where did she get that insulin ? What do you think was the dose she gave and what was the potassium levels on these children ?

@AGK666726 @m1chaelbarnes @drphilhammond Not how it works you idiot. Why would anyone give so much insulin to a baby that wasn't prescribed and too through a feed bag? It's murder or attempted murder. No other reason.

Why could Ben Myers find no expert witnesses to defend the insulin poisoning theory, whereas Mark McDonald has found plenty? Letby’s fate was effectively sealed at the pre-trial expert meeting, when experts on both sides agreed exogenous insulin had been given to two babies, alongside a theory as to how Letby might have secretly spiked nutrition bags. The jury never heard expert explanations of the unreliability of the tests, particularly in neonates, and the far more plausible causes for the prolonged hypoglycaemia in these two particular neonates. The judge knew about the expert agreement on exogenous insulin before the trial started, the jury found unanimous guilt on the insulin cases and were then directed by the judge to use this finding of guilt in making judgements on other cases. Even if the CCRC concludes there is reasonable doubt in the insulin cases, having been given very detailed experts reports that the jury never saw, Letby may not get an appeal because these experts could have given their evidence at the original trial. Which comes back to my first question. Why couldn’t Myers find experts prepared to challenge the insulin poisonings when McDonald can? My full report on the pre-trial joint expert meeting is below. Other reports at private-eye.co.uk/special-report…

@saintant @drphilhammond You really need to keep up to date - your posts makes one feel as if your in a time warp 🙄 Your internet working ok ???

@drphilhammond Still nothing about Shoo Lee’s omissions? It almost seems as though your agenda is completely biased.

The important legal point here is whether the jury was told Hindmarsh was under investigation by the GMC so they could judge what weight to give to his evidence. I can find no evidence that they were told. theguardian.com/uk-news/2026/m…

@DrSusanOliver1 @brianoflan46772 You do understand, but perhaps not , that if you’ve read the papers - they merely back up what Lee is saying.

@brianoflan46772 You seem to be totally missing the point. The issue isn't whether or not Lee was aware of the paper. The issue is that Lee made claims at his press conference that are contradicted by the paper.

Curious that no other news outlets appear to have picked up this story showing some of the deficiencies of Letby's expert panel, but they pick up nearly every pro-Letby story, no matter how incredulous. Letby's PR agency working overtime?

@BreakellWe60182 @HaloFred182 @drpaulclarke You watched the news this am ? Re St James’ ….Streeting there today ……strangely not looking for a murderer ……🤔🤔🤔

@HaloFred182 @drpaulclarke Think he’s got better things to do than discuss with an account like you.

#lucyletby @drpaulclarke has blocked me which is a shame because I was enjoying our exchanges. Here is the full transcript of his interview with The Trial. Shoo Lee has in fact addressed the papers which Clarke suggests he overlooked -see next chat reddit.com/r/LucyLetbyTri…

@drpaulclarke Why on earth would anyone determine scientific fact from the daily mail - are you serious ?? I read the scientific paper is that so hard for you to grasp !

@welshphoton Oh gosh. Clearly you just didn’t read the Daily Mail article or listen the podcast.

New *and old!* research cast doubts on evidence submitted to help free Lucy Letby dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1…

@ca_scrimshaw @drpaulclarke QED!

@welshphoton @drpaulclarke Oh I want you to explain to me what it means I can’t be arsed. Isn’t that how it goes? You say I don’t understand so I will humour you. Explain it to me

@drpaulclarke ….also look at the X-ray , says a lot about clinically what is going on here in the case report

@drpaulclarke Perhaps you just didn’t read the crucially important sentence : “Systemic air embolism is a rare and lethal complication in neonates under high ventilator pressure use.” ….Lee has said this. Also look at the X-ray - pul interstitial and subcutaneous emphysema. Did you read it??

@drpaulclarke @LucyLetbyTrials @drphilhammond You did notice this important phrase - “Systemic air embolism is a rare and lethal complication in neonates under high ventilator pressure use.”……particularly last 5 words??? ….which is what Lee has always said !

@welshphoton @LucyLetbyTrials @drphilhammond *bear

That's a great question: would @drpaulclarke defend his arguments in a dialogue with @drphilhammond? It's not like Dr Clarke can claim that he'd rather not discuss his opinions about the Lucy Letby case with journalists, after all.

@drpaulclarke @LucyLetbyTrials @drphilhammond Maybe should have just said “frightening “!

@ca_scrimshaw @drpaulclarke The ones in the paper quoted by Hull - read it ! What they say merely reaffirms what Lee said in his paper. Look at the X-ray , the fact it specifically states high pressure ventilation….its not hard honest

@welshphoton @drpaulclarke What scientific facts are those? Please don’t send me another link or screenshot from the gospel according to Letby they are getting tedious now

@saintant @BigTed360 @MartynPitman @lizhull The paper they quote reaffirms what he has said !

@saintant @BigTed360 @MartynPitman @lizhull The scientific paper describes exactly what Lee described in his papers and the press conference ….there really is no debate if you’ve read the paper

Yet another piece of below GCSE-level journalism by @lizhull, presumably in a desperate attempt to redress the balance, following a dire few weeks for the #LuctLetby is guilty brigade. This, however, is a case report NOT a peer reviewed scientific paper. The poor baby that this..

@ca_scrimshaw @drpaulclarke Are scientific facts hard for you to accept - you certainly keep the same mentality as your fellows

@welshphoton @drpaulclarke Ok , keep telling yourself that.

@rosiew5 Me too such poor poor journalism and showing complete ignorance of the past they actually quote. Shocking reflection on the journalists

I'm speechless dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1…

@ca_scrimshaw Read the scientific paper and you’ll realise it merely backs up what Lee said - sadly the Mail journalists don’t seem to understand the medicine here in this paper. It’s pure bad bad journalism - nothing else , just shocking !

Oh dear oh dear 👀👀 dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1…

@saintant @BigTed360 @MartynPitman @lizhull And I am talking of the scientific paper not what the mail journalist has written!!!

@welshphoton @BigTed360 @MartynPitman @lizhull Now try reading the article posted to see how discredited their work has been