虾特

@gustav0cardenas wow，这个人无知的很有趣，x帮我标记下

Los comunistoides de Twitter son muy graciosos, tienen creencias basadas en su ignorancia supina. En China ninguno de esos servicios que tú llamas derechos son gratuitos (salud, educación, vivienda o alimentos). 🔷La educación secundaria y universitaria es privada; solo la primaria y media son públicas, pero los padres costean todos los materiales, uniformes, transporte, etc. 🔷China no tiene un sistema de salud pública como algunos países hispanoamericanos; su sistema es mayoritariamente privado y cuenta con seguros de copago, es decir, cuando van al médico, el seguro paga una parte y la persona la otra. 🔷La comida en China no es gratuita y se vende en el mercado como en cualquier país. 🔷Con respecto a la propiedad, no existe la propiedad privada de la tierra, pero las viviendas se venden bajo el término legal de usufructo. Así que eso que dices que China refuta esto es mentira, ya que allá, como en todos los países, estos servicios se cobran. Lean, zurditos.

@mikepompeo @ACLJ 有朋友给川普总统推荐一款合格的洗手液吗😿

Just as we must win in Iran, we cannot allow Russia to claim victory in Ukraine. My latest for @ACLJ: aclj.org/national-secur…

@jacksonhinkle 你个傻鸟，也不能为了流量一直放我们家领导人的丑照吧，忍你很久了啊

🇺🇸🇨🇳 Elon Musk says that the US must manufacture chips domestically, otherwise China will inevitably win the AI race.

@GordonGChang 你离fox原来越远了🤣

“Guarantees”? China does not honor commitments, agreements, or guarantees. Doesn’t anyone remember the Phase One trade deal of January 2020?

@jacksonhinkle 我理解以色列的诉求，不赞同以色列的行为

Israel is a fake country.

@Bj76011862 妈的，又又又......又被世界看到了吗

台灣成為首個優惠國

@GordonGChang 因为美国人很愚蠢，允许你这样的“天才”存在

China steals our IP because we let it.

@LemonTreeandSea 不重要，你开心最重要

你们觉得，中国还有多少年才能成为民主国家呢？

@aricchen 是的，所以日本也别挣扎了，你也是，别做民族的叛徒，没好下场，和二战在美国的日本人一样。去读读历史

@zmhowmore 俄羅斯和中共，一直以來，都聲稱是好夥伴，不是嗎？！難道中俄生變？

Beijing's Worst Nightmare: Manila Just Made Japan Its First-Ever Top-Tier Security Partner! In a powerful demonstration of Indo-Pacific resolve against Beijing's relentless coercion, Japan under Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi and the Philippines under President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. have just elevated their bilateral relationship to a Comprehensive Strategic Partnership — Japan's second-highest diplomatic tier, characterized by Japanese officials as "just short of a formal alliance." Crucially, Japan becomes Manila's first-ever Comprehensive Strategic partner — a deliberate signal from the Philippines about which way the regional winds are blowing. Sealed at the Akasaka State Guest House on May 28 during Marcos' state visit, the upgrade is not symbolic theater — it is a hard-security architecture taking shape in real time. Tokyo and Manila formally launched negotiations on a General Security of Military Information Agreement (GSOMIA), the framework that will allow the two democracies to share classified defense and operational intelligence on Chinese military movements in the East and South China Seas. They also agreed to convene a "2+2" meeting of foreign and defense ministers at an early date, opened maritime boundary delimitation talks, and pledged to accelerate the transfer of Abukuma-class destroyer escorts to bolster Philippine naval capacity facing Chinese gray-zone aggression. All of this builds on the Reciprocal Access Agreement that entered force in September 2025 and the Acquisition and Cross-Servicing Agreement signed in January — the legal scaffolding of a quasi-alliance now being filled in at unprecedented speed. The timing is exquisite. Just two weeks earlier, during the Trump-Xi summit in Beijing on May 14–15, Xi Jinping became visibly agitated as he attacked Prime Minister Takaichi by name over Japan's defense buildup, labeling Tokyo's "remilitarization" a threat to regional peace and, according to Yomiuri Shimbun reporting, even urging President Trump not to support Takaichi or Taiwan's President Lai Ching-te. Trump pushed back, defending Takaichi and reaffirming that Japan must adopt a stronger security posture. Xi's clumsy attempt to drive a wedge between Washington and Tokyo did not just fail — it produced the opposite of what he wanted. Within fourteen days, the Japanese prime minister he tried to undermine signed Tokyo's most ambitious bilateral security pact in Southeast Asian history. From the Quad and AUKUS to the Japan-Philippines Comprehensive Strategic Partnership, from trilateral US-Japan-Philippines coordination to the trilateral US-Japan-South Korea framework, the free world is no longer reacting to Chinese coercion — it is architecting around it. Every Beijing tantrum produces another agreement. Every threat from Xi produces another signature. Every "red line" produces another red line crossed. Xi Jinping's "divide and conquer" playbook is not just outdated. It is now actively counterproductive — a self-defeating reflex that delivers his adversaries the unity he most fears. The era of unchecked Chinese assertiveness is not just drawing to a close. It is being closed, deliberately, by the very nations Beijing tried to intimidate. Original article by me @aricchen. Views are my own — welcome to discuss! © 2026 Aric Chen. All rights reserved. Any unauthorized use will be reported under the DMCA.

@SpicyDumpling02 你愿意为了日本，像二战时的日本英烈一样进行万岁冲锋吗？如果可以，我还是尊重你的，你的愚蠢配得上你的言论

Chinese hates Japan for no reason? For no fucking reason? This is precisely why they hate Japan. You assholes want to rewrite history

@GordonGChang 是的，美国人离不开dji吗？

China’s Communist Party demands absolute obedience from DJI and every other Chinese company. If the CCP demands that DJI commit acts of espionage or sabotage, it must comply.

@zaobaosg 早啊，印度早报

中国国防部长董军连续第二年不出席香格里拉对话，中国代表团将由中国人民解放军国防大学教授孟祥青率领参会。 #Echobox=1780015483" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">zaobao.com.sg/news/china/sto…

@johannesmkx 按照你理论亚洲人也说出“三位在世的欧洲人”披头士算吗？重点是没人关心欧洲发生的事，比如欧洲已经成为穆斯林的聚居地。那么，谁会关心欧洲人的处境呢？没有

Not being able to name "three living Chinese people" isn't a failure of the West. It's a failure of Chinese civilization. It lacks the appeal the West has. The West has movie stars and pop singers the world loves. China doesn't produce these. By the way, I *was* able to name 3 Chinese people: Xi Jinping, Ai Weiwei (dissident artist) and Jack Ma (Ali Baba). Does Jackie Chan count? I could name a few more. But the point is, everyone in the world wants to have sex with White people. What about Chinese? Do they have this sex appeal? No, they don't. Should anyone care about their society then? Nope!

好像得罪哪国政客了，无法回复引用帖子了，这个号应该很快要被封禁了，和YouTube一样吧

@wangzhian8848 我完爆王菊的菊，填满

我去过法国，我感觉法国菜完爆英国菜，不接受反驳。

@Chris09231294 @NautilusZou @harukaawake 说明你对政治的理解非常肤浅！为什么冷战时美国极力抵抗共主义？现在美国力量还是占优势，将来呢？也许你们也不能侮辱美国领导人了，和冷战时谈论共产主义一样

@NautilusZou @harukaawake I’m an American. I have talked to Chinese citizens while I was flying into China. Your own citizens told me it was illegal to insult the Chinese leader and you would get in trouble for doing so. Yet in America we can insult the leader all we want.

It is 100% legal in Japan to curse the emperor. In China, your communist country, it's 100% illegal. If I curse the emperor, people will either agree with me or disagree with me (most will disagree). If I go to China and curse Xi Jinping, it carries the death penalty.

@Chris09231294 @NautilusZou @harukaawake 看来留言，原来美国人也有“言论自由”的边界-以色列🤣🤣🤣

@DWalpiri 我靠，中国还是不够强大啊，美国人可以逮捕另一国的总统，为什么中国不可以？

The term “South China Sea” should be rejected, officially on international stage. It implies ownership over a sea, that China uses to bully neighboring states, militarize disputed waters & destroy regional stability. It’s a shared Southeast Asian sea, not China’s

有区别吗？站最后面的是志愿的？