Building in public.
Fresh from the devs: Nabu's strategy interface MVP.
Show some love to the team grinding (weekends included) to make this happen.
More coming soon. Join the waitlist 🔗👇
I hear you. I feel there's a disconnect. Protocols are like, "let's get a DevRel, they can run hackathons, builders will love us; then pivot 3 months later. You don't build a developer community around a narrative. Builders want tech that will be around in 10 years, they invest time, energy, money and yet these cowboy protocols expect them to take all the risk.
And, I don't even have a solution for you. I live deep inside Web3 teams writing their docs. If I can't tell you whether I trust the product team to stay the path and see out their roadmap, how are you supposed to make that call as a builder?
@ANodeRunner Its been a really hard space as a builder.. because I am not sure where to deploy.. I am second guessing myself each time.. and I often find it hard to have the next step what happens after you have deployed.. etc
I once worked in a project that did 3 pivots in one year. You're not working for product:market fit if all you're doing is chasing attention. You're not building anything if all you do is pivot.
My 2c's: Focus on something that has the potential to go beyond your lifetime!
Permissioned Testnet is LIVE 🌊🧵
We're delivering sub-second atomic execution across chains - no bridges, no wrapped tokens, just pure multichain performance.
Start building today: tally.so/r/mJvVk7
1/8
My 2Cs: Checkout the very cool tooling by @machinationsio for token design (began with game design, stuck around for token economies).
@VoltCapital are doing some solid theory on tokenomics.
Qredo did some pretty damn nifty vault design (MPC, multisig with AI bots with threshold signing, and more) --> who has the IP now; not sure.
More stables: hmm what with hard coded floors?! Do we need more stables?
Topics I want to learn more about (see more on stages)
- incentives design in 2025
- tokenomics / token strategy in 2025 and beyond
- vault design
- risk/reward trade off of launching native stablecoins
(Or maybe these exist and I’m just going to the wrong events, point me to the right people and places)
Totally agree. Blinkers on assuming that your product is the shizzel is also not strategy. But, throwing "AI" in there, cause, attention, trying 5 different lanes at once is just throwing rocks to see what they hit. Would it hurt to do some market research? Would it hurt to have a strategy, a product roadmap, a timeline to give that product a chance? Tiny gods forbid, would it hurt to talk to some potential customers (>3 pals)?
@ANodeRunner It really depends on the pivot.. being too hard headed about your own ideas and not seeing what the market is doing is a risk same as pivoting away from the original idea. Both presents risk, and there are times you do need to pivot.
Ineffective workplaces hand out KPIs that can't be measured, are misaligned with the mandate, and that exclude large components of the day-to-day work.
Effective workplaces encourage collaboration between managers and employees to set KPIs that are specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART).