ElectionMapsIF

16K posts

ElectionMapsIF banner
ElectionMapsIF

ElectionMapsIF

@ElectionMapsIF

Heritage American 🇺🇸

Sumali Ağustos 2024
105 Sinusundan873 Mga Tagasunod
Naka-pin na Tweet
ElectionMapsIF
ElectionMapsIF@ElectionMapsIF·
Why I am still voting republican: - Secure borders - Mass deportations - Net negative migration - Opposing anti-White DEI regimes - Defending free speech in Europe - Defunding leftist NGOs - Crime is down - Inflation is down - Most importantly, they're not the left
ElectionMapsIF tweet mediaElectionMapsIF tweet mediaElectionMapsIF tweet mediaElectionMapsIF tweet media
English
11
8
89
2.4K
ElectionMapsIF
ElectionMapsIF@ElectionMapsIF·
@glizygxbler @bumbadum14 Some are. That's how the bell curve works Roughly one in every 650k Africans or one in every 8,200 modern African Americans would be, assuming a normal distribution w/ SD = 15 I treat people I know as individuals, but policy shouldn't be based upon exceptions, imo
English
0
0
1
26
ElectionMapsIF
ElectionMapsIF@ElectionMapsIF·
@ryanburge Over 50% of Hindus are naturalized or first gen. We need mass denaturalizations now
English
0
1
3
91
Ryan Burge 📊
Ryan Burge 📊@ryanburge·
The religious groups most likely to be immigrants: Hindus: 72% immigrated to the US themselves. Muslims are next closest at 39% Non-white Catholics are at 34% The groups who have been here the longest: White evangelicals Black Protestants LDS Mainline
Ryan Burge 📊 tweet media
English
7
16
107
5.1K
ElectionMapsIF
ElectionMapsIF@ElectionMapsIF·
@brdmoedr @nikicaga This would end up giving you the policies of Mette Frederiksen and lock the CDU out of the working class vote for a generation
English
0
0
0
55
Olgaa
Olgaa@brdmoedr·
@nikicaga It's terrifying that there has to be a voter out there who wants this as his preferred government coalition
Olgaa tweet media
English
7
0
87
2.3K
ElectionMapsIF
ElectionMapsIF@ElectionMapsIF·
@daily_czechia @nikicaga It really is that simple, but the left outside of Denmark refuses to do it. They could have 100 years of social democracy if they weren't hell-bent on replacing White people
English
0
0
4
79
Daily Czechia
Daily Czechia@daily_czechia·
@nikicaga So maybe do something about immigration before these pro Russian freaks have a one party government?… Oh sorry I forgot that mass migration is the core of your ideology.
English
4
0
17
1.3K
ElectionMapsIF
ElectionMapsIF@ElectionMapsIF·
@nikicaga GroKo won 79% of voters over 70 and just 34% of voters under 25 This era will be remembered as the last gasp of Boomer political dominance in Germany
ElectionMapsIF tweet media
English
0
0
18
435
ElectionMapsIF
ElectionMapsIF@ElectionMapsIF·
@RyanHurst171 They only ever do this with respect to promiscuous women. They never tell the women to settle for men who have a problem with porn
English
0
0
5
23
Ryan Hurst ⛪
Ryan Hurst ⛪@RyanHurst171·
Pressuring young adults to view those with a sexually promiscuous past as being on the same level as those who have remained chaste their whole life is actually a pretty wicked thing to do, I think.
English
147
1.4K
19.7K
440.8K
ElectionMapsIF
ElectionMapsIF@ElectionMapsIF·
@BreTweetz If porn is indeed a drug as social conservatives say, then this man was its El Chapo He damaged and destroyed countless lives and did enormous damage to our entire culture, purely for profit Charlie gave his life for causes greater than himself
English
0
0
9
46
bre
bre@BreTweetz·
Don’t celebrate his death. You don’t have to mourn or feel bad at all, but don’t celebrate. We cannot criticize the people who cheered when Charlie Kirk was murdered & all of a sudden do the same when it’s someone we don’t like. If you’re religious, let God be his judge. Pray for his soul. If you’re going to stand for something, stand. Don’t allow your morals to be incidental.
Pop Base@PopBase

Leonid Radvinsky, owner of OnlyFans, has died at the age of 43.

English
408
144
1.4K
75.2K
Dimitri
Dimitri@thedimitri·
"My wife was formerly promiscuous. I was a virgin."
Dimitri tweet mediaDimitri tweet mediaDimitri tweet media
Trevor Sheatz@TrevorSheatz

My wife was formerly promiscuous. I was a virgin. She was then radically born-again. Committed to church, evangelized constantly, Puritan books in her bedroom, prayer journals, grief over past sexual sin, etc. We got to know each other well for over a year, dated for four months, engaged for two and a half, and didn't sin sexually with one another. Our first kiss with each other was at the altar on our wedding day (reaction pic attached!). We've been married for over five years now, and she's been the most wonderful and godly wife, mother to our three children, and homemaker you could imagine. She's more pure than most virgins, as biblical purity has less to with past sins (though they certainly matter) and more to do with one's current posture of the heart and daily decisions to honor the Lord (Matt. 5:8). We're far too quick to forget the story of the woman labeled as a known "sinner" (likely a prostitute) in Luke 7:36-50 who was washing Jesus' feet with her tears while kissing them too. The Pharisees were shocked that Jesus let a public sinner do this. Jesus responded with a parable about debts being forgiven and ended with this powerful conclusion: "Her many sins have been forgiven; that’s why she loved much. But the one who is forgiven little, loves little" (Luke 7:47). Everyone seems to highlight the benefits of virginity, and it certainly is a blessing. But we forget to highlight the benefits of being forgiven much as well. My wife knows the depths of Jesus' forgiveness more than most people, enabling her to more easily live out a life of passionate love for her Savior. A woman or man's past sexual sin matters. But what matters far more when it comes to deciding who to marry is if the person is truly born again, if their repentance is real, if they truly have a heart for Christ, if they truly follow Jesus and obey his commands. "God has chosen what is foolish in the world to shame the wise, and God has chosen what is weak in the world to shame the strong. God has chosen what is insignificant and despised in the world ​— ​what is viewed as nothing ​— ​to bring to nothing what is viewed as something, so that no one may boast in his presence. It is from him that you are in Christ Jesus, who became wisdom from God for us ​— ​our righteousness, sanctification, and redemption, — in order that, as it is written: 'Let the one who boasts, boast in the Lord.'" (1 Cor. 1:27-31) "Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; the old has passed away, and see, the new has come!" (2 Cor. 5:17)

English
38
15
830
22.3K
ElectionMapsIF
ElectionMapsIF@ElectionMapsIF·
@Felix_Nuno The only major city RN had was Perpignan and they won an absolute majority there in the first round
English
0
0
0
194
ElectionMapsIF nag-retweet
Reddit Lies
Reddit Lies@reddit_lies·
Daily reminder: They want to kill you.
Reddit Lies tweet media
English
387
593
8.3K
152.2K
Sovereign Economy
Sovereign Economy@SovEconomy·
@BowTiedRanger I have spent too much time debating people under my reply to this post about theology and society. Apparently in the modern “Christian” theology you are not allowed to push for a good, moral society anymore.
English
2
0
14
4.7K
BowTiedRanger
BowTiedRanger@BowTiedRanger·
Absolutely unreal thing to post 😂 😂
Trevor Sheatz@TrevorSheatz

My wife was formerly promiscuous. I was a virgin. She was then radically born-again. Committed to church, evangelized constantly, Puritan books in her bedroom, prayer journals, grief over past sexual sin, etc. We got to know each other well for over a year, dated for four months, engaged for two and a half, and didn't sin sexually with one another. Our first kiss with each other was at the altar on our wedding day (reaction pic attached!). We've been married for over five years now, and she's been the most wonderful and godly wife, mother to our three children, and homemaker you could imagine. She's more pure than most virgins, as biblical purity has less to with past sins (though they certainly matter) and more to do with one's current posture of the heart and daily decisions to honor the Lord (Matt. 5:8). We're far too quick to forget the story of the woman labeled as a known "sinner" (likely a prostitute) in Luke 7:36-50 who was washing Jesus' feet with her tears while kissing them too. The Pharisees were shocked that Jesus let a public sinner do this. Jesus responded with a parable about debts being forgiven and ended with this powerful conclusion: "Her many sins have been forgiven; that’s why she loved much. But the one who is forgiven little, loves little" (Luke 7:47). Everyone seems to highlight the benefits of virginity, and it certainly is a blessing. But we forget to highlight the benefits of being forgiven much as well. My wife knows the depths of Jesus' forgiveness more than most people, enabling her to more easily live out a life of passionate love for her Savior. A woman or man's past sexual sin matters. But what matters far more when it comes to deciding who to marry is if the person is truly born again, if their repentance is real, if they truly have a heart for Christ, if they truly follow Jesus and obey his commands. "God has chosen what is foolish in the world to shame the wise, and God has chosen what is weak in the world to shame the strong. God has chosen what is insignificant and despised in the world ​— ​what is viewed as nothing ​— ​to bring to nothing what is viewed as something, so that no one may boast in his presence. It is from him that you are in Christ Jesus, who became wisdom from God for us ​— ​our righteousness, sanctification, and redemption, — in order that, as it is written: 'Let the one who boasts, boast in the Lord.'" (1 Cor. 1:27-31) "Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; the old has passed away, and see, the new has come!" (2 Cor. 5:17)

English
220
189
5.9K
518.1K
ElectionMapsIF
ElectionMapsIF@ElectionMapsIF·
@BowTiedRanger Cuckstianity has done more to drive good young men away from the church than any Dawkins book
English
0
0
7
69
ElectionMapsIF
ElectionMapsIF@ElectionMapsIF·
@YBNeverBurgerAg @tbs6253 @bumbadum14 The hypothetical hinges on a metaphysical belief system that is objectively wrong It's similar to the "can God make an object so heavy that He can't lift it" shit from reddit atheists You don't have to entertain a hypothetical that renders itself impossible
English
1
0
0
18
Youngboy Never Bourgeoisie Again
@tbs6253 @ElectionMapsIF @bumbadum14 “Engage this hypothetical” “NUH UH if I treat the hypothetical like a metaphysical belief system, it contradicts my metaphysical belief system, so it’s impossible and I won’t engage lalalalalala” Aristotle might have been right about natural slavery
English
1
0
3
42
ElectionMapsIF
ElectionMapsIF@ElectionMapsIF·
@TomBuck The Biblical King David committed adultery and murder, yet you would NEVER encourage your daughter to marry a man with a such a past. It's only even the men who are expected to absolve women of accountability for their actions.
English
0
0
2
45
Tom Buck (Five Point Buck)
If someone argues that a former promiscuous woman is "damaged goods" and questions whether a Christian young man should marry her, remember Rahab. She was a Canaanite prostitute but became a mother in the lineage of Jesus. God redeemed her, cleansed her, and Salmon married her.
English
424
142
2.1K
2.9M
Trevor Sheatz
Trevor Sheatz@TrevorSheatz·
My wife was formerly promiscuous. I was a virgin. She was then radically born-again. Committed to church, evangelized constantly, Puritan books in her bedroom, prayer journals, grief over past sexual sin, etc. We got to know each other well for over a year, dated for four months, engaged for two and a half, and didn't sin sexually with one another. Our first kiss with each other was at the altar on our wedding day (reaction pic attached!). We've been married for over five years now, and she's been the most wonderful and godly wife, mother to our three children, and homemaker you could imagine. She's more pure than most virgins, as biblical purity has less to with past sins (though they certainly matter) and more to do with one's current posture of the heart and daily decisions to honor the Lord (Matt. 5:8). We're far too quick to forget the story of the woman labeled as a known "sinner" (likely a prostitute) in Luke 7:36-50 who was washing Jesus' feet with her tears while kissing them too. The Pharisees were shocked that Jesus let a public sinner do this. Jesus responded with a parable about debts being forgiven and ended with this powerful conclusion: "Her many sins have been forgiven; that’s why she loved much. But the one who is forgiven little, loves little" (Luke 7:47). Everyone seems to highlight the benefits of virginity, and it certainly is a blessing. But we forget to highlight the benefits of being forgiven much as well. My wife knows the depths of Jesus' forgiveness more than most people, enabling her to more easily live out a life of passionate love for her Savior. A woman or man's past sexual sin matters. But what matters far more when it comes to deciding who to marry is if the person is truly born again, if their repentance is real, if they truly have a heart for Christ, if they truly follow Jesus and obey his commands. "God has chosen what is foolish in the world to shame the wise, and God has chosen what is weak in the world to shame the strong. God has chosen what is insignificant and despised in the world ​— ​what is viewed as nothing ​— ​to bring to nothing what is viewed as something, so that no one may boast in his presence. It is from him that you are in Christ Jesus, who became wisdom from God for us ​— ​our righteousness, sanctification, and redemption, — in order that, as it is written: 'Let the one who boasts, boast in the Lord.'" (1 Cor. 1:27-31) "Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; the old has passed away, and see, the new has come!" (2 Cor. 5:17)
Trevor Sheatz tweet media
Tom Buck (Five Point Buck)@TomBuck

If someone argues that a former promiscuous woman is "damaged goods" and questions whether a Christian young man should marry her, remember Rahab. She was a Canaanite prostitute but became a mother in the lineage of Jesus. God redeemed her, cleansed her, and Salmon married her.

English
5.9K
477
5.3K
5M
ElectionMapsIF
ElectionMapsIF@ElectionMapsIF·
@GrifterwatchYT @bumbadum14 You don't understand. Imagining yourself in their shoes isn't empathy Real empathy would be looking at the world from their perspective. Such empathy requires understanding what their brains are capable of. Their perspective would not be the same as mine in any circumstance
English
1
0
6
56
Grifter Watch
Grifter Watch@GrifterwatchYT·
@ElectionMapsIF @bumbadum14 Another sign of intelligence and empathy is being able to imagine life in someone else's shoes. Imagining that life, what it's like. The question isn't asking you to reshape reality.
English
1
0
5
66
Bill Oliger
Bill Oliger@Bill__Oliger·
“But I did eat breakfast this morning”
ElectionMapsIF@ElectionMapsIF

@bumbadum14 "Would you rather be a black slave" is a nonsensical question. I could not be a black slave because I am my genes Chattel slavery would be horrible for a high IQ White man capable of more, but the average black slave lacked the capacity to understand how we would experience it

English
1
0
0
15
ElectionMapsIF
ElectionMapsIF@ElectionMapsIF·
@GrifterwatchYT @Terminus1488 @bumbadum14 I speak of eternal truths and biological essentialism. You chose to bring up popularity. I am merely measuring you by your own metric. Have a great day. You seem like you haven't had one in a while
English
1
0
2
15
ElectionMapsIF
ElectionMapsIF@ElectionMapsIF·
@GrifterwatchYT @bumbadum14 The false premise is suggesting that I would still be me if I were not descended from my particular ancestors Even if blacks were not less intelligent by an enormous order of magnitude (they are) I still couldn't be black, just as I couldn't be Chinese
English
1
0
8
75
Grifter Watch
Grifter Watch@GrifterwatchYT·
@ElectionMapsIF @bumbadum14 The false premise you're imagining is that you're so racist you think black people just couldn't comprehend how shitty their slavery was.
English
1
0
5
91