Haust Network

Starting in a min

Bringing AI into the real world. How do we move AI from theory to real utility in Web3 and finance? Join us for a live discussion with builders working on AI agents, spatial intelligence, and next-gen financial interfaces. 🗓 Tuesday, March 17 ⏰ 12:00 UTC Hosts: @HaustNetwork Co-host: @CoConnect_ Guests: @tagSpaceCo @haia_os 🎙 Set reminder & join the Space: x.com/i/spaces/1yxBe… Let’s talk about the future of AI-powered infrastructure and real-world adoption.

Finding opportunities in DeFi still depends on Twitter threads, Discord channels, or manually researching protocols. There's no efficient discovery layer. Users hunt for alpha instead of having it surface automatically. This isn't how discovery should work 👇 How Users Discover DeFi Today Most people find DeFi opportunities through external sources. Someone tweets about a new yield farm. A Discord shares a protocol launch. You manually check aggregators and compare APYs across platforms. Discovery is active research, not intelligent surfacing. This creates friction. You need to know where to look, who to follow, which communities matter. Miss the right Twitter thread and you miss the opportunity. Don't check the right aggregator and you don't see the yield. Discovery depends on being plugged into the right information sources constantly. Why Discovery Depends on Fragmented Sources DeFi lacks a unified discovery layer. Protocols exist across chains, information spreads across platforms, and no single tool aggregates everything intelligently. Users patch together knowledge from multiple sources and hope they're not missing something important. This creates information asymmetry. People with time to research constantly find opportunities. Everyone else discovers them late or not at all. Alpha exists, but access is uneven. Discovery shouldn't require full-time attention. How Discovery Should Work Intelligent discovery means opportunities surface based on what you actually hold and how you use DeFi. Hold stablecoins? Here are yield options sorted by risk. Interact with lending protocols? Here are new markets worth considering. Trade frequently? Here are liquidity opportunities. The system should know your profile and suggest relevant opportunities automatically. You're not hunting for alpha. Alpha comes to you based on context the system already has. @Haia_os demonstrates this approach. Instead of manually researching DeFi, you ask what's available. The assistant surfaces opportunities sorted by relevance to your holdings and behavior. Yields, risks, and strategies get presented based on what you actually need, not generic lists. Discovery becomes conversational. "Show DeFi opportunities" returns options that make sense for your portfolio. Then you can curate them and understand how they can add to you. Always remember to DYOR 😉 The Path Forward DeFi discovery will shift from manual research to intelligent surfacing. Users want relevant opportunities, not exhaustive lists. They want context-aware suggestions, not generic aggregation. The information exists. The discovery layer just needs to connect it to users intelligently. @Haia_os shows what that looks like: opportunities surface automatically, research happens in

Ready for another Space, traders? This week, we’re diving into AI trading. 🎙️ AI Trading is Booming. Here’s how they do it! Join us for a fun conversation with👇 @0x_Markets | @haia_os | @MyQuantgg 🎙️Hosted by @RikwijkV & @leagueoftraders 📅March 5 | 11 PM UTC 🔔Join us: x.com/i/spaces/1yxBe… 🎁Stick around till the end for a live giveaway - tune in, like & RT to enter!

15 min and we starting

Web4 is Here. Don’t Get Left Behind. 🗓 Today, 3rd March ⏰ 12:00 UTC 📍 Live on X The next evolution of the internet is unfolding — and we’re bringing together some of the sharpest minds building it. Our guests: 🎙 @haia_os 🎙 @delnorte_io 🤝 @CoConnect_ — Co-host 🏠 @HaustNetwork — Host 🎙 @internet_token 🎙 @OpenMatter_ We’ll dive into: • What Web4 actually means • Infrastructure + AI convergence • The future of decentralized ecosystems • Where the real opportunities are If you’re building, investing, or simply watching the space evolve — this conversation is for you. See you there fam

this is → → → crypto → → → with @haia_os

this is ↓      ↓← ← ← ← ← ↓      ↓      ↑ ↓      ↓        ↑ → → → → → → → crypto        ↓        ↓        ↓ without @haia_os

@MilkRoad @VitalikButerin Finality at 8 seconds changes user behavior more than any token incentive ever could. Right now crypto UX feels like sending a wire transfer. At 8 seconds, it feels like a tap

Ethereum's 2029 "Strawmap" Roadmap explained in 1 min 34 secs. (If you don’t have time to read this, save it & come back. It’s important) The Ethereum Foundation just laid out their biggest technical plan since the merge, and it's pretty wild. The short version? Seven hard forks by 2029, with EF researcher Justin Drake spelling out the goals: - L2s scaling to 10 million TPS. - L1 throughput hitting 10,000 TPS. - Post-quantum cryptography baked in. - Shielded $ETH transfers for actual privacy. - Transaction finality cut from 16 minutes to 8 seconds. Lemme explain why any of that actually matters: 1/ Finality first When you send ETH right now, it takes about 16 minutes before the network is 100% sure that transaction can't be undone. That's finality. The new Minimmit consensus mechanism would shrink that down to seconds by using a single round of voting instead of multiple rounds. Block times would also get faster - from 12 seconds now, stepping down through 8, 6, 4, and maybe eventually 2 seconds. Vitalik's framing is that it's more like turning a dial than flipping a switch. 2/ Throughput Gas is the fuel the network burns to process transactions - and right now there's a pretty tight limit on how much it can burn per second. This roadmap wants to blow that open by orders of magnitude, going "Gigagas" on L1 and "Teragas" on L2s. More transactions per second = more gas getting burned. 3/ The quantum stuff Michael Saylor was just out here saying quantum threats to Bitcoin are still a decade-plus away and nothing to worry about... Ethereum's taking the opposite approach - treating it as a real engineering problem with an actual target fork to fix it. The solution is switching to hash-based signatures, which don't rely on the math that quantum computers are expected to eventually break. 4/ Privacy Every single $ETH transfer right now is completely public - the amount, who sent it, who received it, all of it. Shielded transfers would change that. Vitalik described the overall rebuild as a "Ship of Theseus" situation: Where you swap out individual pieces one at a time until eventually the whole thing is new. In summary: Bullish!

@AshCrypto Quantum computers powerful enough to break ECDSA don't exist yet. But Ethereum moving now means the upgrade happens on their terms, not in panic mode. Four years of planned forks beats one emergency hardfork under fire

THIS IS MASSIVE !! Ethereum is finally solving its biggest problem. Yesterday, Vitalik unveiled a new technical roadmap to make Ethereum quantum resistant. This roadmap has identified four critical vulnerabilities in the current network and proposes replacing them with post-quantum cryptography over a four-year period. The plan involves seven planned network forks occurring roughly every six months to incrementally harden the protocol with key upgrades, including: Validator Signatures: Replacing the current BLS (Boneh-Lynn-Shacham) signatures with "lean" quantum-safe hash-based signatures. Data Availability: Migrating data storage verification from KZG (Kate-Zaverucha-Goldberg) commitments to STARK-based proofs. User Account Signatures: Moving away from ECDSA (secp256k1) to quantum-resistant schemes, supported by EIP-8141 (Native Account Abstraction). Zero-Knowledge Proofs: Upgrading application-layer ZK proofs (like Groth16) to use protocol-layer recursive signatures and proof aggregation to maintain speed while adding security. If everything goes smoothly, Ethereum will be fully quantum resistant by 2029.

@raintures Absorption zones don't announce themselves. They just stop breaking. $60–70K spent months doing exactly that, and the lawsuit gave retail an exit narrative while smart money quietly filled bags. The timing was convenient

Since the Jane Street lawsuit, $BTC reclaimed a meaningful part of the prior compression range. On the weekly, that whole “lawsuit zone” around ~$60–70K was absorption. Price chopped, liquidity rotated, weak hands exited. Then expansion. Now we’re seeing part of that move re-absorbed instead of instantly rejected, which is structurally different from the prior pattern of post-close sell pressure. When ranges stop breaking down and start holding, it usually tells you something about positioning. Correlation? Maybe

@LarkDavis Power doesn't disappear when you remove one player. It relocates. Satoshi built the exit. Wall Street built a new entrance

Here's the mental part nobody's talking about. Satoshi created Bitcoin so insiders couldn't pull strings. No gatekeepers. No middlemen. No special access. Then the ETFs launched. And suddenly four firms got... special access. JPMorgan. Goldman. Citadel. Jane Street. One expert put it plainly: we might not have found the villain. We just found the one who got caught. The structure that gave them the power? Still completely intact. Fix Jane Street, fix nothing. The suits always find a way in.

@MaxCrypto Geopolitical shocks create the fastest recoveries. Capital that left on fear tends to return before the headline risk resolves. Macro scared money rarely stays out long

$BTC and $ETH are dumping again. The reason is escalating tensions between US-Iran as negotiations didn't go well.

@cyrilXBT Sellers exhausted at $2K after multiple tests. That's not support anymore, that's rejection of lower prices. $2.2K–$2.4K clears and the narrative flips entirely. Market memory is short but structure isn't

Eth update ETH is showing early signs of strength. It reclaimed the $2K level and is holding steady, which tells me sellers are losing control. The next important level is $2.2K–$2.4K. A break above that would confirm momentum shifting back in favor of buyers.

@CryptoMichNL $65K higher low prints a clean structure shift. Last month's candle close was ugly but setups born from pain tend to run hardest. Month-end closes have memory

Pretty crucial area for me to hold on to. I'd highly favor that $BTC finds a higher low at $65k. However, last day of the month; remember last month? A massive collapse on the markets. Let's see what it brings: holding $65K opens up the scenario to run up from here.

@MerlijnTrader Sentiment bottoms are built in silence. The capital waiting on the sidelines doesn't need conviction, it needs a trigger. Rates move, one policy shifts, and that liquidity doesn't walk in. It floods

BITCOIN SENTIMENT IS CRUSHED. CAPITAL IS WAITING. Trillions are sidelined, watching rates, liquidity, policy. Meanwhile: - Institutions are building - Governments are adapting - Wall Street is positioned Crypto doesn’t need belief to rise. It needs supply. And supply appears when weak hands capitulate.

@CryptoTice_ Chart told the story before CoinDesk had the headline. The retest holding quietly is louder than any announcement. Most miss the entry reading articles about the move they already missed

🚨HERE’S THE TRUTH MOST DON’T LIKE Price action is king. It always has been. Every major dump showed structural weakness before the bad headlines hit. Every major rally started breaking levels before the bullish narrative formed. Markets lead. Media follows. Now look at Bitcoin objectively: • Major resistance was broken • Higher timeframe trend remains intact • Price is printing a textbook retest of the breakout zone That’s not weakness. That’s structural confirmation. Strong trends don’t go vertical forever. They break out → pull back → hold → expand. If this level holds, it validates the breakout. If it fails, structure tells you early. Waiting for headlines is reactive. Reading structure is proactive. Professionals position around levels. Retail reacts to stories. Price decides. Always.

@MerlijnTrader Most traders watch price. The ones who last watch structure. $77K-$78K either confirms the pattern or exposes the bounce as noise. The sequence has been patient. So should you

BITCOIN IS REPEATING THE SEQUENCE. NOT THE PRICE. Post-breakdown structure looks familiar: Compression. Failure. Continuation. Reaccumulation $77K–$78K is the real test. Break it clean: trend repair Reject there: likely pullback toward ~$68K Structure repeats. Headlines don’t.