Hex🥴🧙‍♂️🫶

@kaderkingpin91 @TheLizVariant Nah feet on seat is provocative.

@TheLizVariant I see this as totally unnecessary. If you keep your belongings on the seat—or even your feet—no one will disturb you. That’s better than acting schizophrenic.

This guy has figured out life. He acts like a complete spaz so he can get some personal space and sit alone on public transit. 🤣🤣🤣🤭🤭

@JamesMelville In my opinion, the only journalist worthy of the name.

The late, great John Pilger. Old school journalist who always tried to find the truth from power.

@viking_boer @elonmusk @RealJamesWoods If youre a celebrity. The rest of us lose our accounts🤷‍♂️

@elonmusk @RealJamesWoods ELON ALWAYS TO THE RESCUE.

I’ve received a threat from X that they will be shutting down my account within 48 hours because of something I posted. Of course, there’s no one I can speak to about this. If I’m closed down, just know it’s been fun.

@georgegalloway Think its Larry Loomer.

CARLSON 2028 Tucker Carlson should run for president He'd win in a landslide. Carlson is facing arrest, the CIA are reading his texts and emails after a far-right conspiracy theorist called Laura Loomer snitched on him Follow #MOATS 534 #georgegalloway #TuckerCarlson #CIA #LauraLoomer

As a Bishop, I cannot stay silent. I have today drafted and sent an open letter to His Majesty King Charles III, the text of which reads as follows: To: His Majesty, Charles III, King of the United Kingdom and the Realms, Supreme Governor of the Church of England, Bearer of the ancient title Defender of the Faith. Your Majesty, I write to you neither as a politician nor as a commentator, but as one of your loyal subjects who, as a bishop of Christ’s Church, cannot remain silent while the Christian foundations of this kingdom are steadily dismantled. Sir, there are moments in the life of a nation when silence becomes a form of betrayal. If I refused to speak to Your Majesty now, this would be such a moment. For more than a thousand years the Crown of this realm has stood in solemn covenant with the Christian faith. The laws of this land were shaped by it. The liberties of our people were nurtured by it. The conscience of our civilisation was formed by it. From the abbeys of medieval England to the parish churches of our villages, from the preaching of the Reformers to the missionary zeal that carried the Gospel to the ends of the earth, the Christian faith has not merely influenced Britain — it has defined her. Yet today that inheritance is being quietly but deliberately eroded. Across the institutions of this nation there is a growing hostility toward the faith that built them. Christian belief is mocked in the public square. Christian morality is dismissed as intolerance. Christian institutions are pressured to surrender doctrine in order to conform to the ideology of the age. Within the very Church that bears the name of England, voices have arisen that appear more eager to mirror the spirit of the age than to proclaim the eternal truth of the Gospel. Meanwhile, beyond the walls of our churches, powerful political movements openly speak of removing Christianity from its historic place within the life of this nation. What would once have been whispered is now proclaimed openly: that Britain must become a post-Christian state. It is in this context that I write to you, Your Majesty. For the British Crown does not stand apart from this crisis. The Sovereign of this realm bears a title that is not merely historic but sacred in its origin and meaning: Defender of the Faith. Those words are not decorative. They are a charge. They speak of a monarch whose duty is not merely to preside over the ceremonies of the Church, but to stand as a guardian of the Christian inheritance of the nation. Yet many among your subjects now ask, with increasing anxiety: “Who will defend that inheritance today?” They see a nation drifting from its foundations. And they ask whether the Crown will remain silent while that inheritance is dismantled. Your Majesty, may I be so bold as to observe that your coronation oath was not a poetic formality. It was a solemn vow made before Almighty God to maintain and preserve the Protestant Reformed Religion established by law. Those words bind the conscience of the sovereign. They remind the Crown that its authority is not merely constitutional but moral. The monarch is not merely a symbol of national continuity, but a custodian of the spiritual inheritance that shaped this realm. History records moments when kings and emperors were confronted by the Church and reminded that their authority was accountable before God. In the fourth century Ambrose of Milan stood before the Emperor Theodosius I and reminded him that even the ruler of an empire must bow before the moral law of Christ. That tradition of prophetic witness has never disappeared. Nor should it. For when rulers forget the foundations upon which their authority rests, the Church must speak — not with hostility, but with holy clarity. And so, I write to say this, Your Majesty: The Christian character of this nation is under profound and accelerating assault. If the Crown does not stand visibly and courageously in defence of that inheritance, history will record that the guardians of Britain’s institutions watched in silence as the foundations were removed. The issue before us is not nostalgia. It is civilisation. Remove Christianity from the story of Britain and you do not create a neutral society — you create a moral vacuum. And history teaches us that moral vacuums are never left empty for long. Your Majesty now stands at a crossroads that few monarchs in modern history have faced. For the erosion of Britain’s Christian inheritance will not ultimately be judged by speeches made in Parliament or debates in the press. It will be judged by whether those entrusted with the guardianship of our ancient institutions chose to defend them — or merely preside over their quiet surrender. You may preside over the quiet dissolution of Britain’s Christian identity. Or you may rise to the ancient responsibility entrusted to the Crown and speak with clarity about the faith that built this kingdom. The first path requires little courage. The second will require a great deal. But it is the path that history honours. Your Majesty’s subjects are not asking for religious coercion. They are asking for leadership. They are asking that the sovereign who bears the title Defender of the Faith remember what that title means. They are asking that the Crown hear the growing cry of anguish from Christians across this land who feel that the spiritual inheritance of their nation is being surrendered without resistance. And they are asking whether the Crown will stand with them. For the faith that shaped Britain is not merely a cultural ornament. It is the wellspring from which our laws, our liberties, and our moral imagination have flowed. If it is cast aside, the nation will discover — too late — that it has severed itself from the very roots that sustained it. Your Majesty, to many the Crown is a symbol of authority. But before God it is also a symbol of stewardship. And stewardship carries with it the duty to defend what has been entrusted. May Almighty God grant Your Majesty the wisdom to discern this hour, and the courage to fulfil the sacred duty entrusted to the Crown. Yours faithfully, Bishop Ceirion H. Dewar FSHC Missionary Bishop Diocese of Providence Confessing Anglican Church @PhilHs10 @RevBrettMurphy @revwickland @BishopRobert1 @GBNews @TalkTV @danwootton @Jacob_Rees_Mogg @LozzaFox @BackBrexitBen @RupertLowe10 @KemiBadenoch @JohnCleese

Everyone’s bothered about the unmasking of Banksy. Not me—I’m waiting for the true legendary genius: Wanksy! The guy who covers potholes with dicks so the council actually fills them in. A true British hero. 🇬🇧

@Facts101111 @RealCandaceO @SethDillon @MattWalshBlog Ppffftt...

@RealCandaceO @SethDillon @MattWalshBlog CEASE AND DESIST CANDACE OWENS! Bring on the law suit .. Thank you Matt and Seth , for being Charlie’s voice and defending his honour and family … God bless you 🙏

This is a good example of how defamation works in the modern age, and why it’s not as simple as “just sue them.” The person in this recording is absolutely not Erika. It couldn’t even be Erika because she was like 16 at the time of this recording. And yet this account, amplified by bigger accounts like Ian Carroll, has made this claim recklessly and with malicious disregard for the truth. Can Erika sue over it? Does she have any recourse at all? Sure, she can sue. I hope she does. But in order to win a lawsuit she’d have to prove that this person posted this nonsense knowing it wasn’t true, and then she’d probably have to prove damages, and then she’d have to hope that the broke assholes who posted and amplified it actually have the funds to pay, which they don’t. And all of this will take a long time, years potentially, to sort itself out in court. Even if she wins, it won’t make a difference to the people who’ve already decided that she’s some kind of cartoon villain. They’ll just use the fact of the lawsuit as proof that Erika “has something to hide.” Meanwhile she will have only further highlighted and called attention to the very lies she’s trying to rectify in court. So in other words, it’s the ultimate lose-lose scenario. I’ve experienced much smaller versions of this. People who engage in outright open defamation, slandering my character with totally manufactured lies, and yet I don’t sue for all the reasons above. It’s total bullshit. The upshot is that the slanderers and defamers basically have carte blanche to lie about you and destroy your reputation. Your only recourse is costly, takes a long time, and may damage your reputation even more.

@kateferguson4 They have, for a very long time, been trying to demoralise us. They twist words, they gaslight and they promote division. Remember that they have no care or respect for you and stop consuming their products. Stop paying the TV licence and delete them from your lives.

@KeruboSk If she's asked for your money, she doesnt believe in herself....bite the bullet, prepare for the pain and then dismiss her from your life. Sounds like a cheeky bitch.

Anonymous confession: I’m 53 and planning to marry a woman I’ve dated for three years.I have retirement savings I worked for my whole life.Recently,she asked me to withdraw the money and invest it in a business she wants to start with her brother before we get married. I’m worried about risking my retirement,but she says if I refuse,it means I don’t believe in her and she might reconsider the marriage. At my age,I’m scared of losing everything.Should I risk my savings for love or protect my future?

@Keir_Starmer's Britain

@JohnCleese No John. If their job means humiliating fellow citizens and undermining the rule of law then they should quit. No ifs or buts.....otherwise you become the Nazi concentration camp guard who was just 'folllowing orders'. Dont excuse them John...they know what theyre doing.

I don't blame these poor coppers They have been given an impossible job by officers with a hidden agenda

@KeruboSk Then you need to dig a little harder.

The more I dig into Christianity, the more it feels like Black people were never really supposed to be practicing it in the first place.

Every bishop with a seat in the House of Lords is morally obliged to be personally present there on Wednesday to vote against abortion up to birth, save for illness or bereavement etc.

The United Nations wants you to forget that Ghislaine Maxwell was invited to speak as an "expert" at the UN on multiple occasions.

@JohnCleese Careful John he might have you nicked

Hear, hear ! Are things bad enough to allow us to start talking about rent boys ? I think so...

@JamesMelville She did a good job mate 🙏💯

Happy Mother’s Day to all you magnificent mums. I’m lucky. I got a good one. #mothersday ♥️

@garethicke Too big? Like Charlie?

This won't work. Plus Tucker and Candice and others, are too big to be assassinated. Would be too obvious. They'll try and kill their character instead. A terrorist that kills a lot of people, and is found to have written, 9/11 paper passport style, a note saying they did it because of Tucker/ Candice/whoever wouldn't surprise me.

@JonnieBeGood2Me @queenie4rmnola By whom?

@queenie4rmnola The country will never be great until the debt is paid

I don’t care how unrealistic you think it is. Reparations are owed to Black people. The debt must be settled.

@queenie4rmnola By whom?

Tony Blair admitted the plan on camera They don't care anymore They just tell all of us that Britain must be destroyed and we must be replaced and there is nothing we can do about it