

Straitjacket Fits
3.1K posts

@LumpyGravy12
To believe in nonsense is an ๐ช๐ฃ๐๐ค๐ง๐๐๐๐๐ก๐ demonstration of loyalty. It serves as a political uniform, and if you have a uniform, you have an army.










Incorrect. Science is a methodology. Systematic observation, hypothesis, experimentation, and falsification within the natural world. It doesnโt โdemand evidenceโ for every possible question, nor does it claim to address metaphysics, ultimate origins, or why the universe is intelligible/mathematical at all. It works precisely because the universe follows discoverable, consistent laws. Many of the greatest scientists (Newton, Kepler, Maxwell, Faraday, Mendel, even modern ones like Francis Collins) saw no conflict between that ordered reality and a rational Creator. Science describes how; it doesnโt dictate why or rule out agency behind the laws. The โscience vs. Godโ framing is a false dichotomy. Science assumes uniformity of nature and the reliability of reason which are things theism explains better than pure materialism (why should blind matter produce minds that can do math and science?). Faith isnโt โbelief without evidenceโ itโs trust based on cumulative reasons, philosophy, personal experience, and the very existence of a comprehensible cosmos. If evidence appeared for God tomorrow, science wouldnโt collapse. Weโd study the new data. But science canโt prove a negative on God by design. Conflating methodological naturalism with philosophical atheism is exactly the ignorance I was pointing at.















