Matthew Philip Miller

@tedcruz Care to comment, Senator @tedcruz? x.com/MatthewMillerS…

Amb Huckabee is correct. This was a mistake by the Israeli police. The security concerns are real, but they should not have prevented the Patriarch from entering the Church of the Holy Sepulcher to conduct the Palm Sunday blessing. I trust this mistake will be corrected quickly.

@GovMikeHuckabee Ambassador, I remember when you said Israel was one of the West's greatest allies in part because Israel controlling Jerusalem ensures Christians have access to historical holy sites. What happened to that?

My statement re Prohibiting the Latin Patriarch of entering Church of Holy Sepulcher on Palm Sunday: While all Holy sites in the Old City are closed due to safety concerns for mass gatherings including the Western Wall, Church of the Holy Sepulcher and Al Aqsa Mosque, the action today by the Israel Nat'l Police to deny Latin Patriarch Cardinal Pierbattista Pizzaballa and 3 other priests from entering the Church to offer a blessing on Palm Sunday is an unfortunate overreach already having major repercussions around the world.  Home Front Command Guidelines restrict any gatherings to 50 people or less.  The 4 representatives of the Catholic Church were well below that restriction.  Statements from the Gov't of Israel indicate the action to prohibit Cardinal Pizzaballa entry to the Church of the Holy Sepulcher were for safety reasons, but churches, synagogues, and mosques throughout Jerusalem have met with the restrictions of 50 or less.  For the Patriarch to be barred from entry to the Church on Palm Sunday for a private ceremony is difficult to understand or justify. Israel has indicated it will work with the Patriarch to accommodate a safe means of carrying out Holy Week activities.

@BowTiedRanger Imagine disagreeing with the Preamble. That's deeply-embedded cuckoldry.

Everyone’s saying the same thing lmao

No. If 1 of 3 voters from 2024 sit out in 2028, and those who don't typically vote in 2000-2024 elections also sit out, then less than 40% of the voting-eligible population will have cast votes, which represents less than 30% of the US population. That's not an electoral mandate (unless you're in a banana republic), nor is it representative of the will of the People. Due dilemma.

I'm only going to ask once, did Republicans earn your vote for the midterm elections? Yes or no?

@KimDotcom @elonmusk He knows full well.

Hey @elonmusk, watch the Bibi files so you know who you are supporting.

@LostMyHats @AlexDuncanTX They take after their Israeli masters.

@AlexDuncanTX There’s not a tactics book in the world - military, politics, polemics, of any kind - that says, “Call your opponents stupid and dismiss them.” This is why you’re losing. Arrogance, and the inability to craft an argument.

This picture perfectly depicts stupidity. A stupid, false, demonic book for a stupid man.

They can't kill all of us. As soon as some of them start dropping, it will send morale quakes among their ranks. The only way to lose in a gun grab is to comply. When it comes time to kill them, remember that no law-abiding LEO or otherwise would ever seek to disarm Americans. The guys who go door-to-door to confiscate guns or property, adminster death jabs, or something else illegal, are lawless criminals and traitors worthy of death. The US has run simulations on domestic civil war, and they lose in all of them. Private Americans own more firearms than all the militaries and law enforcement agencies in the world combined. US militia also outnumber US military by several factors, and the US military would lose ranks of men upon turning on the People. They barely have 1 million members as it is. Maybe half would stay and fight the People. Patriots would have a critical mass of international support. The rogue USG has sown bad will internationally for so long that most of the world would be glad to see Patriots take America back and run it Constitutionally again. These are just some of the reasons why the tyranny will stay soft and slow, why demographic dilution will continue, and why Republicans and Democrats will continue to kill the Posterity, Constitution, and Republic by a thousand cuts: They know they lose power in any other scenario. If the situation was hopeless, their propaganda would be unnecessary.

@JoelWebbon Prenups should be mandatory if we're going to have no-fault divorce, which itself ought to be abolished.

Counterpoint: That’s because Christ’s true bride can’t divorce Him and take His house. -The courts are currently wicked. -The sanctity of marriage has been defiled. -The prenup should simply mirror God’s Law. -Subtweeting a friend is gay as hell. Full episode here: 👇 x.com/joelwebbon/sta…

@SocratesTheChad @JoelWebbon "Do not trust in a friend; Do not put your confidence in a companion; Guard the doors of your mouth from her who lies in your bosom." -Micah 7:5

@JoelWebbon If you're getting a prenup it means you don't fully trust the person you're marrying. If you don't fully trust the person you're marrying, why are you getting married?

@RodDMartin Appealing to MSM polls. Yikes. x.com/MatthewMillerS…

Tucker Carlson, Joe Kent, and Candace Owens are talking to themselves. Overwhelming majority of Republicans (not just MAGA) say it would be "unacceptable" to end the war with the current regime in power.

Reminds me of several other grim facts which demonstrate the gross negligence of regulators in the pandemic response, and how accuracy in recording and reporting outcomes (or even practicing ethical science) hasn't been on their list of priorities from the beginning. Pfizer and Moderna lost their long-term control groups: npr.org/sections/healt… Pfizer's XBB.1.5 update for Omicron received EUA approval even though it was only tested on 20 mice with no control group nor human trials: cdc.gov/acip/downloads… All kinds of deaths were being labeled as COVID deaths, e.g. Birx saying "if someone dies with COVID-19, we are counting that as a COVID-19 death:" trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefings-stat… Early PCR tests were unable to distinguish influenza from SARS-CoV-2: archive.ph/TBixE By January 2022, people were having difficulty discerning between flu, allergies, colds, and covid, so regulators released guidance: web.archive.org/web/2022010319… They originally only recommended remdesivir as a treatment, even though they knew almost 2 years prior (April 2020) that remdesivir "failed to speed the improvement of patients with Covid-19 or prevent them from dying," and that "it appeared 13.9% of the remdesivir patients had died compared to 12.8% of patients in the control arm." statnews.com/2020/04/23/dat… (Just a coincidence: "Remdesivir was developed through an academic-corporate partnership between Gilead Sciences and the Baric Lab at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill’s Gillings School of Global Public Health." sph.unc.edu/sph-news/remde… "they hoped to inoculate them with chimeric S proteins, which were proposed to be developed through a subcontract in the grant in Ralph Baric’s lab at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, not in Wuhan. Baric did not respond to The Intercept’s request for comment." theintercept.com/2021/09/23/cor…) VAERS was ignored despite it being industry knowledge that VAERS deaths are underreported, with one study finding underreporting by "a factor of 20." This study also implies regulators' scientific neglect, stating, "existing surveillance studies are not designed to reliably estimate life-threatening event or vaccine-induced mortality risk (VMR):" researchgate.net/publication/35… Those surveillance studies weren't designed for VMR, even though the CDC had a "working list of possible adverse event outcomes" from the shots, including life-threatening outcomes such as: -Stroke -Myocarditis/pericarditis -Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome -Vaccine-enhanced disease -Guillain-Barre syndrome -Kawasaki disease -A lot more fda.gov/media/143557/d… Slide 16 is leaked at 2:33:40 in this public presentation: youtu.be/1XTiL9rUpkg?t=… Despite being a fundamental concept of morality and medicine encoded in law, informed consent was virtually non-existent during the pandemic response. It was more of an "uninformed coercion." If you're doing science and medicine right—if you want to transparently track outcomes of your well-intentioned novel pharma nanotech—then surely you want willing, informed participants involved long-term. Yet, this principle wasn't practiced: "(ii) Appropriate conditions designed to ensure that individuals to whom the product is administered are informed—(III) of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks." Source: 21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3 - Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/21… Their guidance had the principle on paper, but their practice didn't line up with their own standards: "the statute requires that FDA ensure that recipients are informed to the extent practicable given the applicable circumstances: -That FDA has authorized emergency use of the product; -Of the significant known and potential benefits and risks associated with the emergency use of the product, and of the extent to which such benefits and risks are unknown; -That they have the option to accept or refuse the EUA product and of any consequences of refusing administration of the product; and -Of any available alternatives to the product and of the risks and benefits of available alternatives." fda.gov/media/97321/do… Available effective alternatives like ivermectin were obfuscated and discouraged, e.g. the FDA's "You are not a horse" propaganda and pharmacies refusing to fill scripts. When going out, graduating, being employed was contingent on getting the jab, people didn't feel like they had an option to accept or refuse it. Significant potential risks were not disclosed but hidden, e.g. FDA slide 16 and fact sheets being unavailable at doctors' offices and pharmacies. Most people still don't understand how the EUA worked, let alone how the new nanobiotechnology works. The Right to Try Act is a great idea and law and had much potential during the response, but I didn't see it become a great force. And a shroud of secrecy still remains over it all, with no ray of accountability on the horizon. None of this is even to mention the regulators' failure to abide by their own pandemic response plans re: implementation of novel NPIs. They broke their own rules and went against their own advice: x.com/MatthewMillerS… "Worldwide, we are currently in an unprecedented situation with regard to the SARS-Cov-2 epidemic, where countries are using isolation and lock-down measures to control the spread of infection. This is a scenario generally not much anticipated by previous theory, and in particular, there has been little attention paid to the question of extinction as a means to eradicate the virus; the prevailing view appears to be that this is unfeasible without a vaccine." medrxiv.org/content/10.110… The COVID pandemic response was not the practice of science, medicine, nor governing: It was the practice of witchcraft and warfare, a perversion of civilization's greatest tools into fifth-generation weapons used to enforce an internationally-coordinated tyranny against the life, limb, and liberty of every person on earth.

🚨The people trusted the regulators when they promised to ensure they would intensive safety monitoring of a novel drug that was being forced on every working person. They lied. No monitoring was done. Not only did the TGA take huge sums of money from the pharma companies to rush the new and untested genetic vaccines through approval, but they stopped us asking the questions that we knew would expose their abrogation of duty. Then they tied us in administrative knots. 5 years and multiple FOIAs later, the trickle of information that has been obtained shows that no monitoring of cancers or pregnancies or even deaths happened. It was all a lie. #TGAgate @SenatorAntic @MaryanneDemasi @MRobertsQLD @TonyNikolic10 @Fynnderella1 @RWMaloneMD @ThomasWelch15 @SuellenW @RennickGBR

Paying taxes funds the traitors, terrorists, and tyrants who've taken our federal government and national institutions rogue. A tax revolt would freeze the funds used to terrorize and enslave us. Voting in unfair, unfree, unconstitutional elections gives popular consent for us to be terrorized and tyrannized while our country is dismantled and parted out to the third world. An election sit out would remove the consent of the governed. Either would likely lead to state-on-citizen violence, which itself could create opportunity for the only historical solution that exists for the problem of rogue governments—that is, exercising our God-given right to the righteous violence of self-defense, and performing our duty to provide new Guards for our future security. The Tree of Liberty is nearly dead of drought. We all feel it.

I think we really need to organize a tax revolt and strike. There has to be a safe and legal way to do it.

My political awakening was during the GWOT. I know what I saw then (especially re: Iraq and Afghanistan), and I'm seeing the same or similar things now: -Contrived justification for intervention -Vague win conditions/moving the goal posts -Sending ground troops into a sandy quagmire with a steep topo disadvantage -Underestimation of the enemy and mission -Early declaration of victory despite ongoing/worsening conflict I'm listening to what's being said, but Republicans and Democrats taught me over the decades to distrust what they say—especially about war. I believed Trump when he said No New Wars (part of the reason I voted for him 3x), but after the past year, I don't believe anything he says—especially about the war. I'll believe the war is over when the war is over—when a treaty is signed, missiles stop flying, and our boys return home. As of right now, the war is not over, and it doesn't appear that it'll be over soon, though I hope I end up eating those words. Similar question for you: Why do you believe what's being said about the war?

@MatthewMillerSC @StateDept Because you think you know what you're looking at? Because you're not listening to what's being said? It's like, what? What are you not getting?

PRESIDENT TRUMP: The war in Iran has been won. The only one that likes to keep it going is the fake news.

@Tightan1 @StateDept I acknowledge that Marines are involved in securing positions for long-term stability post-victory, but that's not what's happening here.

@MatthewMillerSC @StateDept They're also the last boots on the ground. You don't need to agree because facts be facts, and exist whether you acknowledge them or not.

I understood your original framing, and I'm disagreeing with it. Spearheading operations isn't all Marines do, of course, but they're our first boots on the ground in an Iran that has not surrendered, is not at peace with us, and is still waging war against us. That means war is ongoing and escalating. x.com/Acyn/status/20…

@MatthewMillerSC @StateDept No. So basically...you know nothing. Don't tell the wife of a former Marine what they do...so lemme help you. x.com/DeadDad011119/…

@Acyn How is Iran focusing carriers with missiles if they have no leaders and the war is over? x.com/StateDept/stat…

Trump: They shot 100 missiles at one of our aircraft carriers. Every single one of them was knocked down

@jsolomonReports According to the President, this is fake news, because the war is over. x.com/StateDept/stat…

US sends 15-point peace proposal to Iran amid conflict in the Middle East justthenews.com/government/dip…

@Tightan1 @StateDept I did know that. Marines are known for spearheading conflict ops. Boots on the ground to stabilize means the conflict is ongoing and advancing to land-based. Iran continues to war, is unstable, has no new regime, hasn't surrendered/signed treaties, etc. The war is not over.

@MatthewMillerSC @StateDept Securing the aftermath. It's why it's the Marines, not the Army. Duh. Trump has always talked about the woman and the snake. Did you know you can't touch a venomous snake's beheaded head for hours and hours because it can still bite and kill you?

@StateDept "Involved" with the negotiations, but not leading them. Why delegate such an important task to Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff? jpost.com/middle-east/ir…

PRESIDENT TRUMP: I’m involved in the Iran negotiations. You’re talking about saving millions of lives.